如何帮助学生对认知负荷进行知情评估?研究培训干预措施的作用

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Felix Krieglstein, Manuel Schmitz, Lukas Wesenberg, Günter Daniel Rey
{"title":"如何帮助学生对认知负荷进行知情评估?研究培训干预措施的作用","authors":"Felix Krieglstein,&nbsp;Manuel Schmitz,&nbsp;Lukas Wesenberg,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey","doi":"10.1002/acp.4247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measuring cognitive load and its different types is a significant challenge that is closely related to the development of cognitive load theory (CLT). Previous research has shown that students have difficulty assessing cognitive load after learning or problem-solving. Accordingly, they may not reliably differentiate between the different types of cognitive load. Moreover, students may not consider the entire problem-solving process in their overall cognitive load assessment. The purpose of this work was to examine two training interventions designed to assist students in making informed cognitive load assessments. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 99) included pre-training with a theoretical introduction to CLT to improve differentiation between cognitive load types. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 80) implemented post-training by instructing students to consider all impressions during problem-solving for the overall load assessment. As both interventions were unsuccessful, further research is needed to assist students in assessing cognitive load in an informed manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4247","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Help Students Make Informed Assessments of Cognitive Load: Examining the Role of Training Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Felix Krieglstein,&nbsp;Manuel Schmitz,&nbsp;Lukas Wesenberg,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acp.4247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Measuring cognitive load and its different types is a significant challenge that is closely related to the development of cognitive load theory (CLT). Previous research has shown that students have difficulty assessing cognitive load after learning or problem-solving. Accordingly, they may not reliably differentiate between the different types of cognitive load. Moreover, students may not consider the entire problem-solving process in their overall cognitive load assessment. The purpose of this work was to examine two training interventions designed to assist students in making informed cognitive load assessments. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 99) included pre-training with a theoretical introduction to CLT to improve differentiation between cognitive load types. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 80) implemented post-training by instructing students to consider all impressions during problem-solving for the overall load assessment. As both interventions were unsuccessful, further research is needed to assist students in assessing cognitive load in an informed manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4247\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.4247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.4247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知负荷及其不同类型的测量是一项重大挑战,与认知负荷理论(CLT)的发展密切相关。以往的研究表明,学生在学习或解决问题后很难评估认知负荷。因此,他们可能无法可靠地区分不同类型的认知负荷。此外,学生在进行整体认知负荷评估时可能不会考虑整个问题解决过程。本研究的目的是考察两种旨在帮助学生做出明智认知负荷评估的培训干预措施。研究 1(N = 99)包括对认知负荷理论介绍的预培训,以改进认知负荷类型之间的区分。研究 2(N = 80)通过指导学生在解决问题的过程中考虑所有印象来进行整体负荷评估,从而实施后期培训。由于这两项干预措施都不成功,因此需要进一步研究如何帮助学生以知情的方式评估认知负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How to Help Students Make Informed Assessments of Cognitive Load: Examining the Role of Training Interventions

How to Help Students Make Informed Assessments of Cognitive Load: Examining the Role of Training Interventions

Measuring cognitive load and its different types is a significant challenge that is closely related to the development of cognitive load theory (CLT). Previous research has shown that students have difficulty assessing cognitive load after learning or problem-solving. Accordingly, they may not reliably differentiate between the different types of cognitive load. Moreover, students may not consider the entire problem-solving process in their overall cognitive load assessment. The purpose of this work was to examine two training interventions designed to assist students in making informed cognitive load assessments. Study 1 (N = 99) included pre-training with a theoretical introduction to CLT to improve differentiation between cognitive load types. Study 2 (N = 80) implemented post-training by instructing students to consider all impressions during problem-solving for the overall load assessment. As both interventions were unsuccessful, further research is needed to assist students in assessing cognitive load in an informed manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信