答复"名字的含义"

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christine Brefel-Courbon MD, Ana Marques MD, PhD, Olivier Rascol MD, PhD, for the NS-Park OXYDOPA study group
{"title":"答复\"名字的含义\"","authors":"Christine Brefel-Courbon MD,&nbsp;Ana Marques MD, PhD,&nbsp;Olivier Rascol MD, PhD,&nbsp;for the NS-Park OXYDOPA study group","doi":"10.1002/mds.29944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the letter entitled “What is in a name” from Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Veit Mylius, and Santiago Perez Lloret regarding our recent article.<span><sup>1</sup></span> We thank these authors for providing the three steps necessary to identify pain in Parkinson's disease (PD). They are an essential prerequisite for proposing appropriate treatment of pain in PD. As the authors note, our study focused on chronic pain in PD, therefore, fulfilling the first step. The second step was also respected, because we eliminated patients suffering from pain unrelated to PD (called concomitant pain) as defined by the Marques's algorithm.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Finally, in our case, the third step was to classify and diagnose parkinsonian central pain (PCP). We applied our classification<span><sup>2</sup></span> that is very close to that of Mylius et al,<span><sup>3</sup></span> which was published later. Based on this proposed classification, we used an algorithm aimed at disentangling PCP from other subtypes of chronic pain in PD by specifically and sequentially eliminating what is not PCP. Therefore, by respecting these different steps, we believe we have included mainly PCP patients and not patients suffering from other pain mechanisms.</p><p>Before the definition of nociplastic pain, older classifications of pain in PD defined and classified PCP as “central neuropathic pain” and described as boring, constant, ineffable, and diffuse, not limited to a dermatome or specific neural distribution.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> We agree with the authors that the term “central neuropathic pain,” which corresponds to a lesion of the central somatosensory system, should no longer be used in PD and must be clearly distinguished from PCP. We confirm that our patients suffered from “central parkinsonian pain,” which fits the definition of nociplastic pain, as previously suggested in our classification.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Finally, we would like to add a further step in pain identification, which is to determine and validate diagnostic criteria for each type of pain in PD, particularly for PCP, which is often misdiagnosed and probably underestimated because diagnostic criteria are not well defined. Indeed, PCP is diagnosed mainly on the basis of exclusion criteria, whereas we need to identify positive criteria. We would like to emphasize the need to better characterize the different pains in PD, which is a challenge to enable better evaluation of analgesic strategies in PD patients.</p><p>C.B.C. has received consultancy fees from Merz, BIAL, NHC, Orkyn; grants from the French Ministry of Health: projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants; French Ministry of Research: ANR; France Parkinson, Fondation AXA, Everpharma, Elivie, NHC, and Orkyn; honoraria for speeches from Orkyn, Novartis, and AJR; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Orkyn, AJR, AbbVie, NHC, and Adelia. A.M. has received consultancy fees from AbbVie; grants from the French Ministry of Health: projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants; honoraria for speeches from AbbVie, Aguettant, and Orkyn; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merz, Allergan, and Orkyn; and consultancy fees for a scientific advisory board from Aguettant and AbbVie. O.R. has received consultancy fees from Alkahest, Alzprotect, Apopharma, Astrazeneca, BIAL, Biogen, Britannia, Buckwang, Cerevel, Contera, GE Healthcare, Handltherapeutic, Ionis, Jazz, Kyowa, LGD/nuvamid, Lundbeck, Merz, Neuralight, Neuratrix, Neuroderm, ONO pharma, Orion Pharma, Parexel, PD neurotechnology, Polycaps, Roche therapeutics, Sanofi, Scienture, Servier, Sunovion, Supernus, Synagile, Thelonius, Takeda, Teva, Tolls4patients, UCB, and Zambon; honoraria for speeches Bila, Lundbeck, and Merz; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merz, BIAL, Lundbeck, Neuralight, and Sunovion; and consultancy fees for a scientific advisory board from Alzprotect.</p><p>(1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.</p><p>C.B.C.: 3A, 3B</p><p>A.M.: 3A, 3B</p><p>O.R.: 3A, 3B</p>","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"39 9","pages":"1652-1653"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mds.29944","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to: “What Is in a Name”\",\"authors\":\"Christine Brefel-Courbon MD,&nbsp;Ana Marques MD, PhD,&nbsp;Olivier Rascol MD, PhD,&nbsp;for the NS-Park OXYDOPA study group\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mds.29944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the letter entitled “What is in a name” from Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Veit Mylius, and Santiago Perez Lloret regarding our recent article.<span><sup>1</sup></span> We thank these authors for providing the three steps necessary to identify pain in Parkinson's disease (PD). They are an essential prerequisite for proposing appropriate treatment of pain in PD. As the authors note, our study focused on chronic pain in PD, therefore, fulfilling the first step. The second step was also respected, because we eliminated patients suffering from pain unrelated to PD (called concomitant pain) as defined by the Marques's algorithm.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Finally, in our case, the third step was to classify and diagnose parkinsonian central pain (PCP). We applied our classification<span><sup>2</sup></span> that is very close to that of Mylius et al,<span><sup>3</sup></span> which was published later. Based on this proposed classification, we used an algorithm aimed at disentangling PCP from other subtypes of chronic pain in PD by specifically and sequentially eliminating what is not PCP. Therefore, by respecting these different steps, we believe we have included mainly PCP patients and not patients suffering from other pain mechanisms.</p><p>Before the definition of nociplastic pain, older classifications of pain in PD defined and classified PCP as “central neuropathic pain” and described as boring, constant, ineffable, and diffuse, not limited to a dermatome or specific neural distribution.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> We agree with the authors that the term “central neuropathic pain,” which corresponds to a lesion of the central somatosensory system, should no longer be used in PD and must be clearly distinguished from PCP. We confirm that our patients suffered from “central parkinsonian pain,” which fits the definition of nociplastic pain, as previously suggested in our classification.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Finally, we would like to add a further step in pain identification, which is to determine and validate diagnostic criteria for each type of pain in PD, particularly for PCP, which is often misdiagnosed and probably underestimated because diagnostic criteria are not well defined. Indeed, PCP is diagnosed mainly on the basis of exclusion criteria, whereas we need to identify positive criteria. We would like to emphasize the need to better characterize the different pains in PD, which is a challenge to enable better evaluation of analgesic strategies in PD patients.</p><p>C.B.C. has received consultancy fees from Merz, BIAL, NHC, Orkyn; grants from the French Ministry of Health: projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants; French Ministry of Research: ANR; France Parkinson, Fondation AXA, Everpharma, Elivie, NHC, and Orkyn; honoraria for speeches from Orkyn, Novartis, and AJR; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Orkyn, AJR, AbbVie, NHC, and Adelia. A.M. has received consultancy fees from AbbVie; grants from the French Ministry of Health: projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants; honoraria for speeches from AbbVie, Aguettant, and Orkyn; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merz, Allergan, and Orkyn; and consultancy fees for a scientific advisory board from Aguettant and AbbVie. O.R. has received consultancy fees from Alkahest, Alzprotect, Apopharma, Astrazeneca, BIAL, Biogen, Britannia, Buckwang, Cerevel, Contera, GE Healthcare, Handltherapeutic, Ionis, Jazz, Kyowa, LGD/nuvamid, Lundbeck, Merz, Neuralight, Neuratrix, Neuroderm, ONO pharma, Orion Pharma, Parexel, PD neurotechnology, Polycaps, Roche therapeutics, Sanofi, Scienture, Servier, Sunovion, Supernus, Synagile, Thelonius, Takeda, Teva, Tolls4patients, UCB, and Zambon; honoraria for speeches Bila, Lundbeck, and Merz; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merz, BIAL, Lundbeck, Neuralight, and Sunovion; and consultancy fees for a scientific advisory board from Alzprotect.</p><p>(1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.</p><p>C.B.C.: 3A, 3B</p><p>A.M.: 3A, 3B</p><p>O.R.: 3A, 3B</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"1652-1653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mds.29944\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds.29944\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds.29944","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Daniel Ciampi de Andrade、Veit Mylius 和 Santiago Perez Lloret 就我们最近的文章1 写了一封题为 "名字中包含了什么 "的信,我们非常感谢有机会对这封信作出回应。我们感谢这些作者提供了识别帕金森病(PD)疼痛的三个必要步骤,它们是提出帕金森病疼痛适当治疗方案的重要前提。正如作者所指出的,我们的研究侧重于帕金森病的慢性疼痛,因此满足了第一步的要求。第二步也得到了遵守,因为我们剔除了与帕金森病无关的疼痛患者(称为伴随性疼痛),正如马克斯算法2 所定义的那样。最后,在我们的病例中,第三步是对帕金森中枢性疼痛(PCP)进行分类和诊断。我们采用了与 Mylius 等人的分类法2 非常接近的分类法3 ,该分类法是后来发表的。在这一分类法的基础上,我们使用了一种算法,旨在通过有针对性地依次剔除非帕金森病慢性疼痛的内容,将帕金森病慢性疼痛与其他亚型慢性疼痛区分开来。因此,通过尊重这些不同的步骤,我们认为我们主要纳入了 PCP 患者,而非其他疼痛机制的患者。在定义非痉挛性疼痛之前,较早的 PD 疼痛分类将 PCP 定义为 "中枢神经病理痛",并将其描述为枯燥、持续、难以言喻和弥漫性的疼痛,且不局限于某一皮节或特定的神经分布、5 我们同意作者的观点,即 "中枢神经病理痛 "这一术语与中枢躯体感觉系统的病变相对应,不应再用于帕金森病,必须与 PCP 明确区分开来。2 最后,我们希望在疼痛识别方面再进一步,即确定并验证帕金森病中每种疼痛类型的诊断标准,尤其是 PCP 的诊断标准,因为诊断标准没有明确定义,PCP 经常被误诊,而且很可能被低估。事实上,PCP 的诊断主要依据排除标准,而我们需要确定肯定标准。我们想强调的是,有必要更好地描述帕金森病不同疼痛的特征,这是一项挑战,有助于更好地评估帕金森病患者的镇痛策略。C.B.C.获得了Merz、BIAL、NHC、Orkyn的顾问费;法国卫生部的资助:projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants;法国研究部:法国帕金森、Fondation AXA、Everpharma、Elivie、NHC 和 Orkyn 的资助;Orkyn、Novartis 和 AJR 的演讲酬金;Orkyn、AJR、AbbVie、NHC 和 Adelia 的会议和/或差旅费资助。A.M.从艾伯维获得顾问费;从法国卫生部获得资助:projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants;从艾伯维、Aguettant和Orkyn获得演讲酬金;从Merz、Allergan和Orkyn获得出席会议和/或出差的资助;从Aguettant和艾伯维获得科学顾问委员会的顾问费。O.R.从 Alkahest、Alzprotect、Apopharma、Astrazeneca、BIAL、Biogen、Britannia、Buckwang、Cerevel、Contera、GE Healthcare、Handltherapeutic、Ionis、Jazz、Kyowa、LGD/nuvamid、Lundbeck、Merz、Neuralight、Neuratrix, Neuroderm, ONO pharma, Orion Pharma, Parexel, PD neurotechnology, Polycaps, Roche therapeutics, Sanofi, Scienture, Servier, Sunovion, Supernus, Synagile, Thelonius, Takeda, Teva, Tolls4patients, UCB, and Zambon;Bila、Lundbeck 和 Merz 提供的演讲酬金;Merz、BIAL、Lundbeck、Neuralight 和 Sunovion 提供的出席会议和/或差旅资助;以及 Alzprotect 提供的科学咨询委员会顾问费。(1) 研究项目:A. 构思,B. 组织,C. 执行;(2)统计分析:A.设计,B.执行,C.审查和评论;(3) 手稿:A.撰写初稿,B.审阅和评论。C.B.C.:3A,3BA.M.:3A,3BO.R.:3A,3B
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reply to: “What Is in a Name”

We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the letter entitled “What is in a name” from Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Veit Mylius, and Santiago Perez Lloret regarding our recent article.1 We thank these authors for providing the three steps necessary to identify pain in Parkinson's disease (PD). They are an essential prerequisite for proposing appropriate treatment of pain in PD. As the authors note, our study focused on chronic pain in PD, therefore, fulfilling the first step. The second step was also respected, because we eliminated patients suffering from pain unrelated to PD (called concomitant pain) as defined by the Marques's algorithm.2 Finally, in our case, the third step was to classify and diagnose parkinsonian central pain (PCP). We applied our classification2 that is very close to that of Mylius et al,3 which was published later. Based on this proposed classification, we used an algorithm aimed at disentangling PCP from other subtypes of chronic pain in PD by specifically and sequentially eliminating what is not PCP. Therefore, by respecting these different steps, we believe we have included mainly PCP patients and not patients suffering from other pain mechanisms.

Before the definition of nociplastic pain, older classifications of pain in PD defined and classified PCP as “central neuropathic pain” and described as boring, constant, ineffable, and diffuse, not limited to a dermatome or specific neural distribution.4, 5 We agree with the authors that the term “central neuropathic pain,” which corresponds to a lesion of the central somatosensory system, should no longer be used in PD and must be clearly distinguished from PCP. We confirm that our patients suffered from “central parkinsonian pain,” which fits the definition of nociplastic pain, as previously suggested in our classification.2

Finally, we would like to add a further step in pain identification, which is to determine and validate diagnostic criteria for each type of pain in PD, particularly for PCP, which is often misdiagnosed and probably underestimated because diagnostic criteria are not well defined. Indeed, PCP is diagnosed mainly on the basis of exclusion criteria, whereas we need to identify positive criteria. We would like to emphasize the need to better characterize the different pains in PD, which is a challenge to enable better evaluation of analgesic strategies in PD patients.

C.B.C. has received consultancy fees from Merz, BIAL, NHC, Orkyn; grants from the French Ministry of Health: projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants; French Ministry of Research: ANR; France Parkinson, Fondation AXA, Everpharma, Elivie, NHC, and Orkyn; honoraria for speeches from Orkyn, Novartis, and AJR; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Orkyn, AJR, AbbVie, NHC, and Adelia. A.M. has received consultancy fees from AbbVie; grants from the French Ministry of Health: projet hospitalier de recherche clinique grants; honoraria for speeches from AbbVie, Aguettant, and Orkyn; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merz, Allergan, and Orkyn; and consultancy fees for a scientific advisory board from Aguettant and AbbVie. O.R. has received consultancy fees from Alkahest, Alzprotect, Apopharma, Astrazeneca, BIAL, Biogen, Britannia, Buckwang, Cerevel, Contera, GE Healthcare, Handltherapeutic, Ionis, Jazz, Kyowa, LGD/nuvamid, Lundbeck, Merz, Neuralight, Neuratrix, Neuroderm, ONO pharma, Orion Pharma, Parexel, PD neurotechnology, Polycaps, Roche therapeutics, Sanofi, Scienture, Servier, Sunovion, Supernus, Synagile, Thelonius, Takeda, Teva, Tolls4patients, UCB, and Zambon; honoraria for speeches Bila, Lundbeck, and Merz; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merz, BIAL, Lundbeck, Neuralight, and Sunovion; and consultancy fees for a scientific advisory board from Alzprotect.

(1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.

C.B.C.: 3A, 3B

A.M.: 3A, 3B

O.R.: 3A, 3B

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信