在猪透明带完整卵母细胞中传递 CRISPR/Cas9 的脂质感染方案的优化:共栖时间和试剂功效研究

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q3 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Celia Piñeiro-Silva, Joaquín Gadea
{"title":"在猪透明带完整卵母细胞中传递 CRISPR/Cas9 的脂质感染方案的优化:共栖时间和试剂功效研究","authors":"Celia Piñeiro-Silva,&nbsp;Joaquín Gadea","doi":"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A priority to facilitate the application of lipofection to generate genetically modified porcine embryos and animals will be the use of <em>zona pellucida</em> (ZP)-intact oocytes and zygotes. Recently, our group produced genetically modified embryos by lipofection of ZP-intact oocytes during <em>in vitro</em> fertilization (IVF). This study investigates the effect of two commercial lipofection reagents, Lipofectamine 3000 and Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX, on embryo development and mutation efficiency in ZP-intact porcine oocytes. We compared these reagents with the electroporation method and a control group using two sgRNAs targeting the CAPN3 and CD163 genes. The detrimental effects on cleavage rates were observed in both lipofection treatments compared to the control and electroporated groups. However, blastocyst rates were higher in the Lipofectamine 3000 group than in the electroporated group for both genes. Mutation parameters varied by target gene, with Lipofectamine 3000 achieving higher mutation rates for CD163, while all groups were similar for the CAPN3 gene. Overall efficiency was similar for both lipofectamines, confirming their feasibility for use. In addition, we evaluated the effect of coincubation time (4, 8, and 24 h) on IVF outcomes, embryo development, and mutation parameters. Results indicated that an 8-h coincubation period optimized fertilization and mutation efficiency without significant toxic effects. This study demonstrates that lipofection with either Lipofectamine 3000 or CRISPRMAX during IVF is an effective method for generating genetically modified porcine embryos without the need for specialized equipment or trained personnel, with efficiencies similar to or greater than electroporation. This study also highlights the importance of optimizing reagent selection and coincubation times. There is no difference between Lipofectamine 3000 and CRISPRMAXTM in terms of embryo development and mutation efficiency, and under our experimental conditions, the optimal coincubation time with lipofectamine is 8 h.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23131,"journal":{"name":"Theriogenology","volume":"230 ","pages":"Pages 121-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X24003832/pdfft?md5=4ac151fb9988762414bcfb42d4b0bbdc&pid=1-s2.0-S0093691X24003832-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of lipofection protocols for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in porcine zona pellucida intact oocytes: A study of coincubation duration and reagent efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Celia Piñeiro-Silva,&nbsp;Joaquín Gadea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A priority to facilitate the application of lipofection to generate genetically modified porcine embryos and animals will be the use of <em>zona pellucida</em> (ZP)-intact oocytes and zygotes. Recently, our group produced genetically modified embryos by lipofection of ZP-intact oocytes during <em>in vitro</em> fertilization (IVF). This study investigates the effect of two commercial lipofection reagents, Lipofectamine 3000 and Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX, on embryo development and mutation efficiency in ZP-intact porcine oocytes. We compared these reagents with the electroporation method and a control group using two sgRNAs targeting the CAPN3 and CD163 genes. The detrimental effects on cleavage rates were observed in both lipofection treatments compared to the control and electroporated groups. However, blastocyst rates were higher in the Lipofectamine 3000 group than in the electroporated group for both genes. Mutation parameters varied by target gene, with Lipofectamine 3000 achieving higher mutation rates for CD163, while all groups were similar for the CAPN3 gene. Overall efficiency was similar for both lipofectamines, confirming their feasibility for use. In addition, we evaluated the effect of coincubation time (4, 8, and 24 h) on IVF outcomes, embryo development, and mutation parameters. Results indicated that an 8-h coincubation period optimized fertilization and mutation efficiency without significant toxic effects. This study demonstrates that lipofection with either Lipofectamine 3000 or CRISPRMAX during IVF is an effective method for generating genetically modified porcine embryos without the need for specialized equipment or trained personnel, with efficiencies similar to or greater than electroporation. This study also highlights the importance of optimizing reagent selection and coincubation times. There is no difference between Lipofectamine 3000 and CRISPRMAXTM in terms of embryo development and mutation efficiency, and under our experimental conditions, the optimal coincubation time with lipofectamine is 8 h.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theriogenology\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 121-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X24003832/pdfft?md5=4ac151fb9988762414bcfb42d4b0bbdc&pid=1-s2.0-S0093691X24003832-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theriogenology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X24003832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theriogenology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X24003832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要促进脂质体感染在转基因猪胚胎和动物中的应用,首要任务是使用透明带(ZP)不完整的卵母细胞和合子。最近,我们的研究小组在体外受精(IVF)过程中通过脂质体感染透明带(ZP)不相连的卵母细胞产生了转基因胚胎。本研究调查了两种商用脂质体感染试剂(Lipofectamine 3000 和 Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX)对胚胎发育和 ZP-intact 猪卵母细胞突变效率的影响。我们将这些试剂与电穿孔法和使用两种靶向 CAPN3 和 CD163 基因的 sgRNA 的对照组进行了比较。与对照组和电穿孔组相比,两种脂质体感染处理对裂解率都有不利影响。然而,对于这两个基因,脂质体3000组的囊胚率均高于电穿孔组。突变参数因目的基因而异,Lipofectamine 3000 对 CD163 基因的突变率较高,而对 CAPN3 基因的突变率各组相似。两种脂质体转染剂的总体效率相似,证实了其使用的可行性。此外,我们还评估了共育时间(4、8 和 24 小时)对试管婴儿结果、胚胎发育和突变参数的影响。结果表明,8 小时的共育期可优化受精和突变效率,且无明显毒性影响。这项研究表明,在体外受精过程中使用 Lipofectamine 3000 或 CRISPRMAX 进行脂质体感染是生成转基因猪胚胎的有效方法,无需专业设备或训练有素的人员,其效率与电穿孔相似或更高。这项研究还强调了优化试剂选择和培养时间的重要性。在胚胎发育和突变效率方面,Lipofectamine 3000 和 CRISPRMAXTM 没有区别,在我们的实验条件下,Lipofectamine 的最佳共育时间为 8 小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of lipofection protocols for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in porcine zona pellucida intact oocytes: A study of coincubation duration and reagent efficacy

A priority to facilitate the application of lipofection to generate genetically modified porcine embryos and animals will be the use of zona pellucida (ZP)-intact oocytes and zygotes. Recently, our group produced genetically modified embryos by lipofection of ZP-intact oocytes during in vitro fertilization (IVF). This study investigates the effect of two commercial lipofection reagents, Lipofectamine 3000 and Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX, on embryo development and mutation efficiency in ZP-intact porcine oocytes. We compared these reagents with the electroporation method and a control group using two sgRNAs targeting the CAPN3 and CD163 genes. The detrimental effects on cleavage rates were observed in both lipofection treatments compared to the control and electroporated groups. However, blastocyst rates were higher in the Lipofectamine 3000 group than in the electroporated group for both genes. Mutation parameters varied by target gene, with Lipofectamine 3000 achieving higher mutation rates for CD163, while all groups were similar for the CAPN3 gene. Overall efficiency was similar for both lipofectamines, confirming their feasibility for use. In addition, we evaluated the effect of coincubation time (4, 8, and 24 h) on IVF outcomes, embryo development, and mutation parameters. Results indicated that an 8-h coincubation period optimized fertilization and mutation efficiency without significant toxic effects. This study demonstrates that lipofection with either Lipofectamine 3000 or CRISPRMAX during IVF is an effective method for generating genetically modified porcine embryos without the need for specialized equipment or trained personnel, with efficiencies similar to or greater than electroporation. This study also highlights the importance of optimizing reagent selection and coincubation times. There is no difference between Lipofectamine 3000 and CRISPRMAXTM in terms of embryo development and mutation efficiency, and under our experimental conditions, the optimal coincubation time with lipofectamine is 8 h.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theriogenology
Theriogenology 农林科学-生殖生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
387
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Theriogenology provides an international forum for researchers, clinicians, and industry professionals in animal reproductive biology. This acclaimed journal publishes articles on a wide range of topics in reproductive and developmental biology, of domestic mammal, avian, and aquatic species as well as wild species which are the object of veterinary care in research or conservation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信