连续屠宰植入或未植入基因的肉牛胴体成分的制造产量和异速生长系数

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Kaitlyn R. Wesley , Sierra L. Pillmore , Tylo J. Kirkpatrick , Kimberly B. Cooper , Forest L. Francis , Travis C. Tennant , Wade T. Nichols , Lee-Anne J. Walter , John P. Hutcheson , Ty E. Lawrence
{"title":"连续屠宰植入或未植入基因的肉牛胴体成分的制造产量和异速生长系数","authors":"Kaitlyn R. Wesley ,&nbsp;Sierra L. Pillmore ,&nbsp;Tylo J. Kirkpatrick ,&nbsp;Kimberly B. Cooper ,&nbsp;Forest L. Francis ,&nbsp;Travis C. Tennant ,&nbsp;Wade T. Nichols ,&nbsp;Lee-Anne J. Walter ,&nbsp;John P. Hutcheson ,&nbsp;Ty E. Lawrence","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our objective was to quantify differences in carcass fabrication yield and allometric coefficients of carcass components from implanted and non-implanted steers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Steers (n = 80; initial BW 271 ± 45 kg) were paired and randomized to slaughter date (d 0, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, 378). Individuals were randomized to treatment of negative control (CON) or Revalor-XS on d 0 and 190 (REV). One side of each animal was fabricated after a 48-h chill into primals, denuded subprimals, lean trim, trimmed fat, and bone. Weights (g) of non-carcass and carcass components were log-transformed and consolidated to arithmetic means by treatment and slaughter date. Growth coefficients were calculated using the allometric equation.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Cattle administered REV had increased cold side weights (CSW) 7.7%, bone yield 4.9%, and red meat yield 8.5%, with no differences in fat yield. Forequarter primal weights (chuck, brisket, foreshank, rib) increased 8.4%, 6.9%, 7.2%, and 5.2%, respectively, for REV cattle. Hindquarter primals (loin, flank, round) increased by 7.0%, 8.6%, and 6.3%, respectively, for REV steers. Length of feeding period notably did not affect chuck or loin yields proportionate to CSW. Fat as percentage of CSW increased at 0.04% per day, whereas bone and red meat yield decreased at −0.013% and −0.024% per day, respectively. Allometric growth coefficients were greater for REV in 2 carcass components (chuck eye roll, eye of round), whereas CON was greater in 1 component (flank steak). All primals except the round (0.81) and foreshank (0.87) exhibited growth coefficients greater than the empty body.</p></div><div><h3>Implication and Applications</h3><p>These data indicate that REV steers are more likely to have heavier side weights, greater bone yield, and increased red meat yields than CON steers. Additionally, minimal differences were observed in allometric growth coefficients between CON and REV steers. Steers administered REV greatly improved carcass yield over CON during a 378-d finishing period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000971/pdf?md5=57c150e525b5f0dec631ed6fc340b939&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000971-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fabrication yields and allometric growth coefficients of carcass components of serially slaughtered implanted or non-implanted beef steers\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn R. Wesley ,&nbsp;Sierra L. Pillmore ,&nbsp;Tylo J. Kirkpatrick ,&nbsp;Kimberly B. Cooper ,&nbsp;Forest L. Francis ,&nbsp;Travis C. Tennant ,&nbsp;Wade T. Nichols ,&nbsp;Lee-Anne J. Walter ,&nbsp;John P. Hutcheson ,&nbsp;Ty E. Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/aas.2024-02580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our objective was to quantify differences in carcass fabrication yield and allometric coefficients of carcass components from implanted and non-implanted steers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Steers (n = 80; initial BW 271 ± 45 kg) were paired and randomized to slaughter date (d 0, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, 378). Individuals were randomized to treatment of negative control (CON) or Revalor-XS on d 0 and 190 (REV). One side of each animal was fabricated after a 48-h chill into primals, denuded subprimals, lean trim, trimmed fat, and bone. Weights (g) of non-carcass and carcass components were log-transformed and consolidated to arithmetic means by treatment and slaughter date. Growth coefficients were calculated using the allometric equation.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Cattle administered REV had increased cold side weights (CSW) 7.7%, bone yield 4.9%, and red meat yield 8.5%, with no differences in fat yield. Forequarter primal weights (chuck, brisket, foreshank, rib) increased 8.4%, 6.9%, 7.2%, and 5.2%, respectively, for REV cattle. Hindquarter primals (loin, flank, round) increased by 7.0%, 8.6%, and 6.3%, respectively, for REV steers. Length of feeding period notably did not affect chuck or loin yields proportionate to CSW. Fat as percentage of CSW increased at 0.04% per day, whereas bone and red meat yield decreased at −0.013% and −0.024% per day, respectively. Allometric growth coefficients were greater for REV in 2 carcass components (chuck eye roll, eye of round), whereas CON was greater in 1 component (flank steak). All primals except the round (0.81) and foreshank (0.87) exhibited growth coefficients greater than the empty body.</p></div><div><h3>Implication and Applications</h3><p>These data indicate that REV steers are more likely to have heavier side weights, greater bone yield, and increased red meat yields than CON steers. Additionally, minimal differences were observed in allometric growth coefficients between CON and REV steers. Steers administered REV greatly improved carcass yield over CON during a 378-d finishing period.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000971/pdf?md5=57c150e525b5f0dec631ed6fc340b939&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000971-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是量化植入和未植入药物的母牛胴体制造产量和胴体成分的异速系数的差异。在第 0 天和第 190 天(REV),动物随机接受阴性对照(CON)或 Revalor-XS 处理。每只动物的一侧在冷冻 48 小时后被制成主肉、去毛副主肉、瘦肉、去脂肉和骨头。非胴体和胴体成分的重量(克)按处理和屠宰日期进行对数变换并合并为算术平均数。结果与讨论饲喂 REV 的牛冷侧体重(CSW)增加了 7.7%,骨骼产量增加了 4.9%,红肉产量增加了 8.5%,脂肪产量没有差异。REV 牛的前四分之一主肉重量(卡盘、牛腩、前腿、肋骨)分别增加了 8.4%、6.9%、7.2% 和 5.2%。REV 牛的后季初生牛(腰肉、侧腹肉、圆肉)分别增加了 7.0%、8.6% 和 6.3%。饲养期的长短明显不影响夹头或腰肉产量与全长重量的比例。脂肪占CSW的百分比每天增加0.04%,而骨肉和红肉产量每天分别减少-0.013%和-0.024%。REV的异速生长系数在2个胴体成分(鸡眼卷、圆眼)中较大,而CON的异速生长系数在1个胴体成分(侧腹牛排)中较大。除圆肉(0.81)和前腿肉(0.87)外,所有主肉的生长系数均大于空心肉。 这些数据表明,与 CON 型阉牛相比,REV 型阉牛更有可能获得较重的侧重、较高的骨产量和较高的红肉产量。此外,在异速生长系数方面,CON 和 REV 牛之间的差异极小。在 378 天的育成期中,施用 REV 的母牛比施用 CON 的母牛胴体产量大大提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fabrication yields and allometric growth coefficients of carcass components of serially slaughtered implanted or non-implanted beef steers

Objective

Our objective was to quantify differences in carcass fabrication yield and allometric coefficients of carcass components from implanted and non-implanted steers.

Materials and Methods

Steers (n = 80; initial BW 271 ± 45 kg) were paired and randomized to slaughter date (d 0, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, 378). Individuals were randomized to treatment of negative control (CON) or Revalor-XS on d 0 and 190 (REV). One side of each animal was fabricated after a 48-h chill into primals, denuded subprimals, lean trim, trimmed fat, and bone. Weights (g) of non-carcass and carcass components were log-transformed and consolidated to arithmetic means by treatment and slaughter date. Growth coefficients were calculated using the allometric equation.

Results and Discussion

Cattle administered REV had increased cold side weights (CSW) 7.7%, bone yield 4.9%, and red meat yield 8.5%, with no differences in fat yield. Forequarter primal weights (chuck, brisket, foreshank, rib) increased 8.4%, 6.9%, 7.2%, and 5.2%, respectively, for REV cattle. Hindquarter primals (loin, flank, round) increased by 7.0%, 8.6%, and 6.3%, respectively, for REV steers. Length of feeding period notably did not affect chuck or loin yields proportionate to CSW. Fat as percentage of CSW increased at 0.04% per day, whereas bone and red meat yield decreased at −0.013% and −0.024% per day, respectively. Allometric growth coefficients were greater for REV in 2 carcass components (chuck eye roll, eye of round), whereas CON was greater in 1 component (flank steak). All primals except the round (0.81) and foreshank (0.87) exhibited growth coefficients greater than the empty body.

Implication and Applications

These data indicate that REV steers are more likely to have heavier side weights, greater bone yield, and increased red meat yields than CON steers. Additionally, minimal differences were observed in allometric growth coefficients between CON and REV steers. Steers administered REV greatly improved carcass yield over CON during a 378-d finishing period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信