钢框架砌体填充板的抗荷载能力,以减轻中柱缺失导致的渐进式坍塌

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"钢框架砌体填充板的抗荷载能力,以减轻中柱缺失导致的渐进式坍塌","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The load resistance of masonry infilled panels in upgrading the steel frame to mitigate progressive collapse was quantified experimentally and analytically in the current study. Four 1/2-scale steel subframes were tested, including two bare subframes without infilled panels for reference and two infilled subframes to assess the effects of infilled panels. Two types of connection were investigated in current study: welded connection and top and seat angle connection. The test result showed that infilled panels provided a greater improvement in initial stiffness and peak load of the steel subframe with top and seat angle connections compared to the infilled steel subframe with welded connections. On the premise that the connections retained their integrity, the strut mechanism of infilled panels could change from a diagonal strut mechanism forming in the whole panel to an off-diagonal strut mechanism formed in the remaining intact corner region with increasing vertical deflection. A novel equivalent multi-strut modelling method was proposed for the prediction of the infilled panel behavior with an acceptable level of accuracy. This model incorporates the shifts in the position of plastic hinges, which were influenced by the specific types of connection and the load-resisting mechanisms of the infilled panel. The analysis result demonstrated that the model slightly overestimated the load resistance of infilled panels within the steel frame with simple connections and slightly underestimated the load resistance of infilled panels within steel frame with semi-rigid or rigid connections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load resistance of masonry infilled panels for steel frames to mitigate progressive collapse caused by middle column missing\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The load resistance of masonry infilled panels in upgrading the steel frame to mitigate progressive collapse was quantified experimentally and analytically in the current study. Four 1/2-scale steel subframes were tested, including two bare subframes without infilled panels for reference and two infilled subframes to assess the effects of infilled panels. Two types of connection were investigated in current study: welded connection and top and seat angle connection. The test result showed that infilled panels provided a greater improvement in initial stiffness and peak load of the steel subframe with top and seat angle connections compared to the infilled steel subframe with welded connections. On the premise that the connections retained their integrity, the strut mechanism of infilled panels could change from a diagonal strut mechanism forming in the whole panel to an off-diagonal strut mechanism formed in the remaining intact corner region with increasing vertical deflection. A novel equivalent multi-strut modelling method was proposed for the prediction of the infilled panel behavior with an acceptable level of accuracy. This model incorporates the shifts in the position of plastic hinges, which were influenced by the specific types of connection and the load-resisting mechanisms of the infilled panel. The analysis result demonstrated that the model slightly overestimated the load resistance of infilled panels within the steel frame with simple connections and slightly underestimated the load resistance of infilled panels within steel frame with semi-rigid or rigid connections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224023258\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224023258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过实验和分析量化了砌体填充板在升级钢框架以减轻渐进式坍塌方面的抗荷载能力。测试了四个 1/2 比例的钢制子框架,包括两个不含填充板的裸子框架作为参考,两个填充子框架用于评估填充板的影响。本次研究调查了两种连接方式:焊接连接和顶角连接。测试结果表明,与采用焊接连接的填充式钢制副车架相比,采用顶部和座位角连接的填充式钢制副车架在初始刚度和峰值载荷方面都有较大改善。在连接保持完整性的前提下,随着垂直挠度的增加,填充板的支撑机制可能会从在整个面板中形成的对角支撑机制转变为在剩余的完整角区域中形成的非对角支撑机制。为了以可接受的精度水平预测填充面板的行为,我们提出了一种新型等效多支柱建模方法。该模型包含了塑性铰链位置的移动,而塑性铰链位置的移动受填充面板的特定连接类型和抗载机制的影响。分析结果表明,该模型略微高估了采用简单连接的钢框架内填充板的抗荷载能力,略微低估了采用半刚性或刚性连接的钢框架内填充板的抗荷载能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Load resistance of masonry infilled panels for steel frames to mitigate progressive collapse caused by middle column missing

The load resistance of masonry infilled panels in upgrading the steel frame to mitigate progressive collapse was quantified experimentally and analytically in the current study. Four 1/2-scale steel subframes were tested, including two bare subframes without infilled panels for reference and two infilled subframes to assess the effects of infilled panels. Two types of connection were investigated in current study: welded connection and top and seat angle connection. The test result showed that infilled panels provided a greater improvement in initial stiffness and peak load of the steel subframe with top and seat angle connections compared to the infilled steel subframe with welded connections. On the premise that the connections retained their integrity, the strut mechanism of infilled panels could change from a diagonal strut mechanism forming in the whole panel to an off-diagonal strut mechanism formed in the remaining intact corner region with increasing vertical deflection. A novel equivalent multi-strut modelling method was proposed for the prediction of the infilled panel behavior with an acceptable level of accuracy. This model incorporates the shifts in the position of plastic hinges, which were influenced by the specific types of connection and the load-resisting mechanisms of the infilled panel. The analysis result demonstrated that the model slightly overestimated the load resistance of infilled panels within the steel frame with simple connections and slightly underestimated the load resistance of infilled panels within steel frame with semi-rigid or rigid connections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信