{"title":"感觉运动神经反馈改善抑制控制并诱导神经变化:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、事件相关电位研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>Inhibition is crucial for controlling behavior and is impaired in various psychopathologies. Neurofeedback holds promise in addressing cognitive deficits, and experimental research is essential for identifying its functional benefits. This study aimed to investigate whether boosting sensorimotor activity (SMR) improves inhibitory control in a final sample of healthy individuals (<em>N</em> = 53), while exploring the underlying neurophysiological mechanism.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving SMR neurofeedback training to enhance sensorimotor activity within the 12–15 Hz frequency range, and the other receiving sham feedback. Inhibition performance and neural correlates were evaluated with a Go-NoGo task before (T0) and after (T1) 10 neurofeedback sessions using event-related potentials. Data were analyzed via ANOVAs and regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to placebo, the active group demonstrated higher absolute SMR power (<em>p</em> = 0.040) and improvements in inhibitory control, including faster response times and fewer inhibition errors (<em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 6.06), associated with a larger NoGoP3d amplitude (<em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 3.35). A positive correlation between the increase in SMR power and the rise in NoGoP3d amplitude (β=0.46, <em>p</em> = 0.015) explains 21 % of the observed variance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Uptraining SMR power is linked to heightened utilization of neural resources for executing optimal inhibition responses. These results uphold its effectiveness in cognitive rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260024000668/pdfft?md5=1a3844cbcb1dfa1e3319b8a346bd6f37&pid=1-s2.0-S1697260024000668-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensori-motor neurofeedback improves inhibitory control and induces neural changes: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, event-related potentials study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>Inhibition is crucial for controlling behavior and is impaired in various psychopathologies. Neurofeedback holds promise in addressing cognitive deficits, and experimental research is essential for identifying its functional benefits. This study aimed to investigate whether boosting sensorimotor activity (SMR) improves inhibitory control in a final sample of healthy individuals (<em>N</em> = 53), while exploring the underlying neurophysiological mechanism.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving SMR neurofeedback training to enhance sensorimotor activity within the 12–15 Hz frequency range, and the other receiving sham feedback. Inhibition performance and neural correlates were evaluated with a Go-NoGo task before (T0) and after (T1) 10 neurofeedback sessions using event-related potentials. Data were analyzed via ANOVAs and regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to placebo, the active group demonstrated higher absolute SMR power (<em>p</em> = 0.040) and improvements in inhibitory control, including faster response times and fewer inhibition errors (<em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 6.06), associated with a larger NoGoP3d amplitude (<em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 3.35). A positive correlation between the increase in SMR power and the rise in NoGoP3d amplitude (β=0.46, <em>p</em> = 0.015) explains 21 % of the observed variance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Uptraining SMR power is linked to heightened utilization of neural resources for executing optimal inhibition responses. These results uphold its effectiveness in cognitive rehabilitation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260024000668/pdfft?md5=1a3844cbcb1dfa1e3319b8a346bd6f37&pid=1-s2.0-S1697260024000668-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260024000668\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260024000668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensori-motor neurofeedback improves inhibitory control and induces neural changes: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, event-related potentials study
Background/Objective
Inhibition is crucial for controlling behavior and is impaired in various psychopathologies. Neurofeedback holds promise in addressing cognitive deficits, and experimental research is essential for identifying its functional benefits. This study aimed to investigate whether boosting sensorimotor activity (SMR) improves inhibitory control in a final sample of healthy individuals (N = 53), while exploring the underlying neurophysiological mechanism.
Method
Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving SMR neurofeedback training to enhance sensorimotor activity within the 12–15 Hz frequency range, and the other receiving sham feedback. Inhibition performance and neural correlates were evaluated with a Go-NoGo task before (T0) and after (T1) 10 neurofeedback sessions using event-related potentials. Data were analyzed via ANOVAs and regression analyses.
Results
Compared to placebo, the active group demonstrated higher absolute SMR power (p = 0.040) and improvements in inhibitory control, including faster response times and fewer inhibition errors (p < 0.001, d = 6.06), associated with a larger NoGoP3d amplitude (p < 0.001, d = 3.35). A positive correlation between the increase in SMR power and the rise in NoGoP3d amplitude (β=0.46, p = 0.015) explains 21 % of the observed variance.
Conclusions
Uptraining SMR power is linked to heightened utilization of neural resources for executing optimal inhibition responses. These results uphold its effectiveness in cognitive rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology is dedicated to publishing manuscripts with a strong emphasis on both basic and applied research, encompassing experimental, clinical, and theoretical contributions that advance the fields of Clinical and Health Psychology. With a focus on four core domains—clinical psychology and psychotherapy, psychopathology, health psychology, and clinical neurosciences—the IJCHP seeks to provide a comprehensive platform for scholarly discourse and innovation. The journal accepts Original Articles (empirical studies) and Review Articles. Manuscripts submitted to IJCHP should be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere. All signing authors must unanimously agree on the submitted version of the manuscript. By submitting their work, authors agree to transfer their copyrights to the Journal for the duration of the editorial process.