观察者关系类型对人格评估中自我/观察者一致性的影响

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Kibeom Lee , Reinout E. de Vries , Michael C. Ashton
{"title":"观察者关系类型对人格评估中自我/观察者一致性的影响","authors":"Kibeom Lee ,&nbsp;Reinout E. de Vries ,&nbsp;Michael C. Ashton","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examined two forms of self/observer agreement (correlational and mean-level) in personality using a Dutch university student sample (<em>N</em>=5,405) with self-reports and observer (informant) reports from parents, siblings, friends, and partners/spouses. Correlational self/observer agreement was strong across all HEXACO-PI-R scales and across relationship types (<span><math><mrow><mover><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover></mrow></math></span> ≥ 0.59, but highest for partners). Regarding mean-level self/observer agreement, alleged positive bias in self-reports was not observed. Only Openness showed higher means for self-reports than for observer reports across all relationship types (<em>d</em> = 0.37). Mean observer report scores varied by relationship: people perceived their children as more honest and less anxious and perceived their siblings as less agreeable than other observers did. Partner reports showed the closest mean-level agreement with self-reports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000771/pdfft?md5=b35202e898398e84438eb6c24081322c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000771-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types\",\"authors\":\"Kibeom Lee ,&nbsp;Reinout E. de Vries ,&nbsp;Michael C. Ashton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examined two forms of self/observer agreement (correlational and mean-level) in personality using a Dutch university student sample (<em>N</em>=5,405) with self-reports and observer (informant) reports from parents, siblings, friends, and partners/spouses. Correlational self/observer agreement was strong across all HEXACO-PI-R scales and across relationship types (<span><math><mrow><mover><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover></mrow></math></span> ≥ 0.59, but highest for partners). Regarding mean-level self/observer agreement, alleged positive bias in self-reports was not observed. Only Openness showed higher means for self-reports than for observer reports across all relationship types (<em>d</em> = 0.37). Mean observer report scores varied by relationship: people perceived their children as more honest and less anxious and perceived their siblings as less agreeable than other observers did. Partner reports showed the closest mean-level agreement with self-reports.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000771/pdfft?md5=b35202e898398e84438eb6c24081322c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000771-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用荷兰大学生样本(样本数=5,405),通过自我报告和来自父母、兄弟姐妹、朋友和伴侣/配偶的观察者(信息提供者)报告,研究了人格中自我/观察者一致性的两种形式(相关性和平均水平)。在所有 HEXACO-PI-R 量表和各种关系类型中,自我/观察者的相关一致性都很强(r¯ ≥ 0.59,但伴侣的相关一致性最高)。在平均水平的自我/观察者一致性方面,没有观察到自我报告中的所谓正偏差。在所有关系类型中,只有开放性的自我报告平均值高于观察者报告平均值(d = 0.37)。观察者报告的平均分因关系而异:与其他观察者相比,人们认为子女更诚实、更不焦虑,认为兄弟姐妹更不合群。伴侣报告与自我报告的平均水平最接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types

We examined two forms of self/observer agreement (correlational and mean-level) in personality using a Dutch university student sample (N=5,405) with self-reports and observer (informant) reports from parents, siblings, friends, and partners/spouses. Correlational self/observer agreement was strong across all HEXACO-PI-R scales and across relationship types (r¯ ≥ 0.59, but highest for partners). Regarding mean-level self/observer agreement, alleged positive bias in self-reports was not observed. Only Openness showed higher means for self-reports than for observer reports across all relationship types (d = 0.37). Mean observer report scores varied by relationship: people perceived their children as more honest and less anxious and perceived their siblings as less agreeable than other observers did. Partner reports showed the closest mean-level agreement with self-reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信