在荷兰实行和未实行无烟政策的足球俱乐部吸烟:一项观察研究

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"在荷兰实行和未实行无烟政策的足球俱乐部吸烟:一项观察研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.07.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Research shows that smoking persists in sports clubs with smoke-free policies (SFPs). It is unknown to what extent smoking occurs at such clubs and how much that may differ from clubs without SFPs. This study aimed to determine whether and to what extent smoking differs at Dutch football clubs with and without SFPs.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used a purposive sampling method to compare smoking indicators at 117 Dutch football clubs, with 49 clubs (41.8%) having an SFP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a standardised checklist, three smoking indicators were observed (number of people smoking, smoking facilities, and cigarette butts) and combined in a total smoking score (scale 0–9). Multi-level linear regression analysis was used to analyse the association between club SFP, local tobacco control policies (TCPs), and smoking indicators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significantly fewer smoking facilities were present at clubs with an SFP (−2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.61; −1.09), but no significant associations were found between SFP and the number of people smoking and cigarette butts. The total smoking score was 1.74 points lower for clubs with an SFP (95% CI: −2.53; −0.96) and 1.85 points lower for clubs in municipalities with strong local TCPs (95% CI: −2.98; −0.72). Strong local TCPs were associated with significantly fewer people smoking at clubs (−1.79, 95% CI: −3.41; −0.17).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SFPs at sports clubs succeed in limiting the number of smoking facilities but do not show differences in terms of smoking rates or smoking-related litter when compared to clubs without SFPs. Our results highlight the need for enhancing implementation of comprehensive SFPs, including clear guidelines for compliance and enforcement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003433/pdfft?md5=872fefd548bd0596a96b415412a214ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0033350624003433-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smoking at football clubs with and without smoke-free policies in the Netherlands: an observational study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.07.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Research shows that smoking persists in sports clubs with smoke-free policies (SFPs). It is unknown to what extent smoking occurs at such clubs and how much that may differ from clubs without SFPs. This study aimed to determine whether and to what extent smoking differs at Dutch football clubs with and without SFPs.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used a purposive sampling method to compare smoking indicators at 117 Dutch football clubs, with 49 clubs (41.8%) having an SFP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a standardised checklist, three smoking indicators were observed (number of people smoking, smoking facilities, and cigarette butts) and combined in a total smoking score (scale 0–9). Multi-level linear regression analysis was used to analyse the association between club SFP, local tobacco control policies (TCPs), and smoking indicators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significantly fewer smoking facilities were present at clubs with an SFP (−2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.61; −1.09), but no significant associations were found between SFP and the number of people smoking and cigarette butts. The total smoking score was 1.74 points lower for clubs with an SFP (95% CI: −2.53; −0.96) and 1.85 points lower for clubs in municipalities with strong local TCPs (95% CI: −2.98; −0.72). Strong local TCPs were associated with significantly fewer people smoking at clubs (−1.79, 95% CI: −3.41; −0.17).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SFPs at sports clubs succeed in limiting the number of smoking facilities but do not show differences in terms of smoking rates or smoking-related litter when compared to clubs without SFPs. Our results highlight the need for enhancing implementation of comprehensive SFPs, including clear guidelines for compliance and enforcement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003433/pdfft?md5=872fefd548bd0596a96b415412a214ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0033350624003433-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标研究表明,在实行无烟政策(SFP)的体育俱乐部中,吸烟现象依然存在。目前尚不清楚在这些俱乐部吸烟的程度,以及与未实行无烟政策的俱乐部吸烟的差别有多大。本研究旨在确定在实行和未实行无烟政策的荷兰足球俱乐部中,吸烟现象是否存在差异,以及差异程度如何。研究设计本横断面研究采用有目的的抽样方法,比较了 117 家荷兰足球俱乐部的吸烟指标,其中 49 家俱乐部(41.8%)实行了无烟政策。研究方法使用标准化检查表,观察三项吸烟指标(吸烟人数、吸烟设施和烟头),并将其合并为吸烟总分(0-9 分)。采用多级线性回归分析法分析了俱乐部SFP、当地控烟政策(TCP)和吸烟指标之间的关系。结果在有SFP的俱乐部中,吸烟设施的数量明显减少(-2.35,95% 置信区间[CI]:-3.61; -1.09),但SFP与吸烟人数和烟蒂数量之间没有明显关系。有 SFP 的俱乐部的吸烟总分要低 1.74 分(95% CI:-2.53;-0.96),而在当地 TCP 较强的城市,俱乐部的吸烟总分要低 1.85 分(95% CI:-2.98;-0.72)。结论体育俱乐部的吸烟设施成功地限制了吸烟设施的数量,但与未设置吸烟设施的俱乐部相比,在吸烟率或与吸烟相关的垃圾方面并无差异。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要加强实施全面的SFP,包括明确的遵守和执行准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smoking at football clubs with and without smoke-free policies in the Netherlands: an observational study

Objectives

Research shows that smoking persists in sports clubs with smoke-free policies (SFPs). It is unknown to what extent smoking occurs at such clubs and how much that may differ from clubs without SFPs. This study aimed to determine whether and to what extent smoking differs at Dutch football clubs with and without SFPs.

Study design

This cross-sectional study used a purposive sampling method to compare smoking indicators at 117 Dutch football clubs, with 49 clubs (41.8%) having an SFP.

Methods

Using a standardised checklist, three smoking indicators were observed (number of people smoking, smoking facilities, and cigarette butts) and combined in a total smoking score (scale 0–9). Multi-level linear regression analysis was used to analyse the association between club SFP, local tobacco control policies (TCPs), and smoking indicators.

Results

Significantly fewer smoking facilities were present at clubs with an SFP (−2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.61; −1.09), but no significant associations were found between SFP and the number of people smoking and cigarette butts. The total smoking score was 1.74 points lower for clubs with an SFP (95% CI: −2.53; −0.96) and 1.85 points lower for clubs in municipalities with strong local TCPs (95% CI: −2.98; −0.72). Strong local TCPs were associated with significantly fewer people smoking at clubs (−1.79, 95% CI: −3.41; −0.17).

Conclusions

SFPs at sports clubs succeed in limiting the number of smoking facilities but do not show differences in terms of smoking rates or smoking-related litter when compared to clubs without SFPs. Our results highlight the need for enhancing implementation of comprehensive SFPs, including clear guidelines for compliance and enforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信