评估电动滑板车事故中的头部伤害风险:洞察性别差异的多体模拟研究

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
André Salgado , Daniel Wdowicz , Fábio Fernandes , Mariusz Ptak , Ricardo Alves de Sousa
{"title":"评估电动滑板车事故中的头部伤害风险:洞察性别差异的多体模拟研究","authors":"André Salgado ,&nbsp;Daniel Wdowicz ,&nbsp;Fábio Fernandes ,&nbsp;Mariusz Ptak ,&nbsp;Ricardo Alves de Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>E-scooters have become increasingly popular for short-distance travel in urban areas, but this rise in usage also brings about an increased risk of accidents. Studies have shown that approximately 40% of electric scooter accident victims admitted to hospitals suffer head injuries. Therefore, it is crucial to implement safety measures and improve safety systems and equipment to mitigate these risks. One approach to gaining insights into the injuries users face is through simulations using the multi-body method. This method allows for the reconstruction of accidents by modeling and analyzing the dynamic behavior of interconnected bodies. This study aims to assess the impacts on the user’s head and the injuries they may sustain in electric scooter accidents using numerical methods. Initially, a reference scenario was established based on a YouTube video, with the assumption that the user was an average-height man. Simulations were conducted for various percentiles, including both males and females. Different velocities were simulated to determine the threshold velocity at which survival becomes practically impossible. Two scenarios were considered: one where the car braked for 0.333 s and another where the distance between the start the braking task and the collision was kept constant. The location of the first head impact on the vehicle was also examined. Injury assessment was conducted using two criteria: Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC). The study found that smaller individuals are more vulnerable to severe injuries, and higher car velocities correlate with more severe user injuries. Furthermore, the location of the first impact varies between genders, with women more likely to experience impacts in the lower part of the windshield, while men tend to experience impacts in the central zone. This study highlights the importance of considering user characteristics and accident dynamics in assessing injury risks associated with e-scooters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001366/pdfft?md5=8a66206314c6d1558a66b7fb8935ccf5&pid=1-s2.0-S1344622324001366-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing head injury risks in electric scooter accidents: A multi-body simulation study with insights into sex differences\",\"authors\":\"André Salgado ,&nbsp;Daniel Wdowicz ,&nbsp;Fábio Fernandes ,&nbsp;Mariusz Ptak ,&nbsp;Ricardo Alves de Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>E-scooters have become increasingly popular for short-distance travel in urban areas, but this rise in usage also brings about an increased risk of accidents. Studies have shown that approximately 40% of electric scooter accident victims admitted to hospitals suffer head injuries. Therefore, it is crucial to implement safety measures and improve safety systems and equipment to mitigate these risks. One approach to gaining insights into the injuries users face is through simulations using the multi-body method. This method allows for the reconstruction of accidents by modeling and analyzing the dynamic behavior of interconnected bodies. This study aims to assess the impacts on the user’s head and the injuries they may sustain in electric scooter accidents using numerical methods. Initially, a reference scenario was established based on a YouTube video, with the assumption that the user was an average-height man. Simulations were conducted for various percentiles, including both males and females. Different velocities were simulated to determine the threshold velocity at which survival becomes practically impossible. Two scenarios were considered: one where the car braked for 0.333 s and another where the distance between the start the braking task and the collision was kept constant. The location of the first head impact on the vehicle was also examined. Injury assessment was conducted using two criteria: Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC). The study found that smaller individuals are more vulnerable to severe injuries, and higher car velocities correlate with more severe user injuries. Furthermore, the location of the first impact varies between genders, with women more likely to experience impacts in the lower part of the windshield, while men tend to experience impacts in the central zone. This study highlights the importance of considering user characteristics and accident dynamics in assessing injury risks associated with e-scooters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001366/pdfft?md5=8a66206314c6d1558a66b7fb8935ccf5&pid=1-s2.0-S1344622324001366-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电动滑板车在城市地区的短途旅行中越来越受欢迎,但使用率的上升也带来了事故风险的增加。研究表明,在入院治疗的电动代步车事故受害者中,约有 40% 的人头部受伤。因此,采取安全措施、改进安全系统和设备以降低这些风险至关重要。要深入了解用户面临的伤害,一种方法是使用多体方法进行模拟。这种方法可以通过模拟和分析相互连接的物体的动态行为来重建事故。本研究旨在使用数值方法评估电动滑板车事故对用户头部的影响以及可能造成的伤害。首先,根据 YouTube 视频建立了一个参考情景,假设使用者是一名身高中等的男性。针对不同的百分位数进行了模拟,包括男性和女性。模拟了不同的速度,以确定几乎不可能存活的阈值速度。模拟了两种情况:一种是汽车制动 0.333 秒,另一种是制动开始与碰撞之间的距离保持不变。此外,还考察了头部首次撞击车辆的位置。伤害评估采用两个标准进行:头部损伤标准(HIC)和脑损伤标准(BrIC)。研究发现,体型较小的人更容易受到严重伤害,而车速越高,使用者受到的伤害越严重。此外,第一次撞击的位置因性别而异,女性更容易在挡风玻璃下部受到撞击,而男性则倾向于在中央区域受到撞击。这项研究强调了在评估与电动摩托车相关的伤害风险时考虑用户特征和事故动态的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing head injury risks in electric scooter accidents: A multi-body simulation study with insights into sex differences

E-scooters have become increasingly popular for short-distance travel in urban areas, but this rise in usage also brings about an increased risk of accidents. Studies have shown that approximately 40% of electric scooter accident victims admitted to hospitals suffer head injuries. Therefore, it is crucial to implement safety measures and improve safety systems and equipment to mitigate these risks. One approach to gaining insights into the injuries users face is through simulations using the multi-body method. This method allows for the reconstruction of accidents by modeling and analyzing the dynamic behavior of interconnected bodies. This study aims to assess the impacts on the user’s head and the injuries they may sustain in electric scooter accidents using numerical methods. Initially, a reference scenario was established based on a YouTube video, with the assumption that the user was an average-height man. Simulations were conducted for various percentiles, including both males and females. Different velocities were simulated to determine the threshold velocity at which survival becomes practically impossible. Two scenarios were considered: one where the car braked for 0.333 s and another where the distance between the start the braking task and the collision was kept constant. The location of the first head impact on the vehicle was also examined. Injury assessment was conducted using two criteria: Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC). The study found that smaller individuals are more vulnerable to severe injuries, and higher car velocities correlate with more severe user injuries. Furthermore, the location of the first impact varies between genders, with women more likely to experience impacts in the lower part of the windshield, while men tend to experience impacts in the central zone. This study highlights the importance of considering user characteristics and accident dynamics in assessing injury risks associated with e-scooters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信