J. Rodríguez-Negro , T. Pasarín-Lavín , S. Suarez-Manzano
{"title":"儿童和青少年体育活动干预措施的创造性成果:系统回顾","authors":"J. Rodríguez-Negro , T. Pasarín-Lavín , S. Suarez-Manzano","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on Physical Activity (PA) interventions to foster thinking domain of creativity in children and adolescents, and to investigate the acute and chronic PA interventions variables that moderate creativity outcomes. This review was conducted using the PRISMA framework. A total of 14 studies were identified using WOS and SCOPUS (12 chronic PA and two acute PA intervention), which matched the following criteria: (i) peer-reviewed, longitudinal experimental studies; (ii) studies that included a sample of children or adolescents aged 3–18 years of age; incorporated a PA intervention as the independent variable; (iii) studies with at least one measure of creativity. The total number of participants in the included studies combined was 1539. The results of this review indicate that chronic PA can enhance creativity in school children and adolescents, but the effects varied considerably depending on the qualitative characteristics of the PA and the characteristics of participants. The results of this review suggest that the type of PA, the volume and the intensity of PA may be crucial factors for improving creativity. Regarding the type of PA, games, motor skills, sports and drama activities seem to be the most appropriate, while balancing and walking do not report positive effects. An important finding to emerge from the synthesis was that volume is a key factor, while how they achieve that volume does not have critical implications, as various frequencies of PA were associated with improved creativity. Furthermore, this review identified various moderator variables such as the age of the participants, their creativity level at baseline and whether they were active or inactive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001822/pdfft?md5=d0a83cf26c20bb0379d8d5cb223c72c2&pid=1-s2.0-S1871187124001822-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creativity outcomes of physical activity interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"J. Rodríguez-Negro , T. Pasarín-Lavín , S. Suarez-Manzano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on Physical Activity (PA) interventions to foster thinking domain of creativity in children and adolescents, and to investigate the acute and chronic PA interventions variables that moderate creativity outcomes. This review was conducted using the PRISMA framework. A total of 14 studies were identified using WOS and SCOPUS (12 chronic PA and two acute PA intervention), which matched the following criteria: (i) peer-reviewed, longitudinal experimental studies; (ii) studies that included a sample of children or adolescents aged 3–18 years of age; incorporated a PA intervention as the independent variable; (iii) studies with at least one measure of creativity. The total number of participants in the included studies combined was 1539. The results of this review indicate that chronic PA can enhance creativity in school children and adolescents, but the effects varied considerably depending on the qualitative characteristics of the PA and the characteristics of participants. The results of this review suggest that the type of PA, the volume and the intensity of PA may be crucial factors for improving creativity. Regarding the type of PA, games, motor skills, sports and drama activities seem to be the most appropriate, while balancing and walking do not report positive effects. An important finding to emerge from the synthesis was that volume is a key factor, while how they achieve that volume does not have critical implications, as various frequencies of PA were associated with improved creativity. Furthermore, this review identified various moderator variables such as the age of the participants, their creativity level at baseline and whether they were active or inactive.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001822/pdfft?md5=d0a83cf26c20bb0379d8d5cb223c72c2&pid=1-s2.0-S1871187124001822-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统性综述的目的是评估有关体育锻炼(PA)干预措施促进儿童和青少年创造力思维领域发展的证据,并研究可调节创造力结果的急性和慢性体育锻炼干预变量。本综述采用 PRISMA 框架进行。使用 WOS 和 SCOPUS 共确定了 14 项研究(12 项慢性 PA 和 2 项急性 PA 干预),这些研究符合以下标准:(i) 经同行评审的纵向实验研究;(ii) 包含 3-18 岁儿童或青少年样本的研究;将 PA 干预作为自变量;(iii) 至少有一项创造力测量指标的研究。纳入研究的总人数为 1539 人。综述结果表明,长期体育锻炼可提高学龄儿童和青少年的创造力,但其效果因体育锻炼的质量特征和参与者的特征不同而有很大差异。综述结果表明,活动量的类型、数量和强度可能是提高创造力的关键因素。关于业余爱好的类型,游戏、运动技能、体育和戏剧活动似乎是最合适的,而平衡和步行则没有积极的效果。综述中得出的一个重要发现是,运动量是一个关键因素,而如何达到运动量并不重要,因为各种频率的体育锻炼都与创造力的提高有关。此外,本综述还发现了各种调节变量,如参与者的年龄、他们在基线时的创造力水平以及他们是活跃还是不活跃。
Creativity outcomes of physical activity interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on Physical Activity (PA) interventions to foster thinking domain of creativity in children and adolescents, and to investigate the acute and chronic PA interventions variables that moderate creativity outcomes. This review was conducted using the PRISMA framework. A total of 14 studies were identified using WOS and SCOPUS (12 chronic PA and two acute PA intervention), which matched the following criteria: (i) peer-reviewed, longitudinal experimental studies; (ii) studies that included a sample of children or adolescents aged 3–18 years of age; incorporated a PA intervention as the independent variable; (iii) studies with at least one measure of creativity. The total number of participants in the included studies combined was 1539. The results of this review indicate that chronic PA can enhance creativity in school children and adolescents, but the effects varied considerably depending on the qualitative characteristics of the PA and the characteristics of participants. The results of this review suggest that the type of PA, the volume and the intensity of PA may be crucial factors for improving creativity. Regarding the type of PA, games, motor skills, sports and drama activities seem to be the most appropriate, while balancing and walking do not report positive effects. An important finding to emerge from the synthesis was that volume is a key factor, while how they achieve that volume does not have critical implications, as various frequencies of PA were associated with improved creativity. Furthermore, this review identified various moderator variables such as the age of the participants, their creativity level at baseline and whether they were active or inactive.
期刊介绍:
Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.