生态系统过程对气候变暖的热适应性

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1111/nph.20131
Jinsong Wang, Shuli Niu
{"title":"生态系统过程对气候变暖的热适应性","authors":"Jinsong Wang, Shuli Niu","doi":"10.1111/nph.20131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>The Earth's climate is changing rapidly, with temperature increases posing significant challenges to the biosphere. How the timing of life-history events in organisms, which is closely linked to many ecosystem functions, responds to increasing global temperatures is an emerging ecological frontier (Liu <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). In a recent <i>New Phytologist</i> article, Lu <i>et al</i>. (<span>2024</span>, doi: 10.1111/nph.20019) show that plant phenology responses to elevated temperatures level off with warming magnitude and experimental duration. This provides solid empirical evidence for the acclimation of plant phenology to higher and longer warming. <blockquote><p>‘In addition to the activities related to these recurring biological events, other ecosystem processes are likely to acclimate to climate warming as well.’</p>\n<div></div>\n</blockquote>\n</div>\n<p>Plant phenology has showed complex responses to climate warming, with implications for a wide range of ecosystem functions and services. However, whether the responses of plant phenophases will strengthen or weaken with greater degrees of warming or long-term warming remains a challenge for ecological research. Using a global meta-analysis of 103 experimental warming studies, Lu <i>et al</i>. show that: (1) the response of plant phenology levels off with increasing warming magnitude for herbaceous plants, but not for woody plants; and (2) warming effects on plant phenology also diminish with longer experimental duration, and the slowed rates are regulated by climatic factors. Although previous studies have already found the attenuated leaf-out response to rising warming magnitude in temperate species (Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>), the study by Lu <i>et al</i>. provides new evidence for long-term thermal acclimation of different plant phenophases at the global scale. These findings highlight that as climate warming continues; shifts in plant phenology may be less than anticipated.</p>\n<p>In addition to the activities related to these recurring biological events, other ecosystem processes are likely to acclimate to climate warming as well. For example, it is well characterized that plant photosynthesis increases with temperature and reaches an optimum temperature, beyond which photosynthetic rates decline (Sendall <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>). Gross primary production (GPP), which is jointly controlled by plant phenology and photosynthesis (Xia <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>), generally increases with temperature until it reaches an optimal temperature, beyond which GPP declines at higher temperatures (Fig. 1) (Huang <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>; Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Similarly, recent studies suggest widespread optimum temperatures of respiration at leaves, microbes, and ecosystems to global scales (Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). The widespread thermal optimality of GPP also leads to an optimum temperature of net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide world-wide, as revealed by 169 global eddy covariance sites (Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2012</span>). The optimum temperatures of these carbon fluxes generally increase with environment temperatures (Crous <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Chen <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>; Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>), suggesting thermal acclimation of ecosystem carbon cycling (Fig. 1). The thermal optimality and acclimation of these broad ecosystem processes has implications for climate change. For example, the thermal optimality of ecosystem respiration over the globe implies that the previous interpretation of a universal exponential relationship between terrestrial ecosystem respiration and temperature may overestimate the positive feedbacks between climate change and the carbon cycle (Chen <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>).</p>\n<figure><picture>\n<source media=\"(min-width: 1650px)\" srcset=\"/cms/asset/58d08e25-e9c3-49c8-8ebb-319d822fbd45/nph20131-fig-0001-m.jpg\"/><img alt=\"Details are in the caption following the image\" data-lg-src=\"/cms/asset/58d08e25-e9c3-49c8-8ebb-319d822fbd45/nph20131-fig-0001-m.jpg\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"/cms/asset/f6588d35-4de7-4a8a-a556-8f7317488d1d/nph20131-fig-0001-m.png\" title=\"Details are in the caption following the image\"/></picture><figcaption>\n<div><strong>Fig. 1<span style=\"font-weight:normal\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer<i aria-hidden=\"true\"></i><span>PowerPoint</span></div>\n</div>\n<div>Thermal optimality of gross primary production (GPP) from six representative sites of FLUXNET over different temperature zones (MAT ranges from −10.4–10.5°C). At all six sites, GPP increases with temperature in the low range, reaches a maximum, and then declines in the high range. Warmer sites, which are more adaptable to warming, have a higher optimum temperature than colder sites. US-ATQ: Atqasuk, USA (MAT = −10.4°C); CA-QFO: Eastern Boreal, Mature Black Spruce, Canada (MAT = 1.0°C); CA-GRO: Groundhog River, Boreal Mixedwood Forest, Canada (MAT = 3.2°C); US-UMD: UMBS Disturbance, USA (MAT = 7.1°C); DE-SPW: Spreewald, Germany (MAT = 10.4°C); US-OHO: Oak Openings, USA (MAT = 10.5°C).</div>\n</figcaption>\n</figure>\n<p>Thermal acclimation of these ecosystem processes is caused by various mechanisms, such as enzyme deactivation, changes in organism physiology, or a shift in community composition, and can be regulated by temperature-dependent abiotic factors (e.g. soil moisture, nutrient availability, and nonstructural plant carbohydrates). When temperature increases over shorter time scales (e.g. hours, days or seasons), the response of ecosystem processes is predominantly driven by physiological responses. For instance, enzyme activities and metabolic rates may be inhibited at high temperatures (Atkin &amp; Tjoelker, <span>2003</span>), resulting in unimodal temperature responses of ecosystem processes. However, when temperature increases over years or decades, evolutionary adaptation may occur, with less adaptive species being replaced by more thermo-tolerant ones (McGaughran <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Thus, changes in vegetation or microbial communities under long-term warming may lead to the thermal adaptation of terrestrial ecosystems (Melillo <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). However, the rates at which different life forms respond may vary significantly; for instance, Lu <i>et al</i>. showed that although the phenological responses of both herbaceous and woody plants decreased over time, herbaceous species are more likely to undergo rapid evolutionary adaptation than woody plants due to their higher evolutionary rates.</p>\n<p>Lu <i>et al</i>. also stated that other limiting factors, such as soil water, nutrient availability, and photosynthetic substrates, may become more important and constrain phenological responses to rising temperatures over longer periods. Similarly, a previous study illustrates that the pace of GPP acclimation and adaptation is slower in water-limited regions, as revealed by 326 eddy covariance sites over the globe (Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>), suggesting that humid regions will benefit more than dry and warm regions in terms of carbon uptake from vegetation adaptation to future warming. Together, these findings highlight that resource limitations or co-limitation will increasingly govern ecosystem processes in response to long-term climate warming.</p>\n<p>Although there is growing evidence of thermal acclimation in terrestrial ecosystems at different levels of organization in response to warming, the interplay between the acclimation of aboveground and belowground processes, as well as the underlying mechanisms, remains unclear. Previous studies have found that belowground phenology, such as the phenology of roots, microbes and soil fauna often responds asynchronously, when compared to aboveground phenology, in response to warming (Liu <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>; Yin <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Building on findings from Lu <i>et al</i>., it is imperative to conduct whole-ecosystem field experiments with both above- and belowground warming (Fig. 2) in diverse ecosystems to disentangle the degree of thermal acclimation for different organisms (e.g. leaves, roots, soil microbes and fauna) and various ecological processes related to ecosystem functioning and services. These whole-ecosystem warming experiments should provide a crucial step and enrich existing experiments, which mostly focus on the aboveground.</p>\n<figure><picture>\n<source media=\"(min-width: 1650px)\" srcset=\"/cms/asset/9f3564c9-7b79-40dc-866b-c7212906aae7/nph20131-fig-0002-m.jpg\"/><img alt=\"Details are in the caption following the image\" data-lg-src=\"/cms/asset/9f3564c9-7b79-40dc-866b-c7212906aae7/nph20131-fig-0002-m.jpg\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"/cms/asset/21231957-c6c7-46bb-a3fb-1270fdf3643d/nph20131-fig-0002-m.png\" title=\"Details are in the caption following the image\"/></picture><figcaption>\n<div><strong>Fig. 2<span style=\"font-weight:normal\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer<i aria-hidden=\"true\"></i><span>PowerPoint</span></div>\n</div>\n<div>Schematic diagram (a) and picture (b) of a whole-ecosystem warming experiment in an alpine peatland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China (33°7′17″N, 102°38′26″E). The manipulative experiment was set up in a fen in 2022 to simulate above- and belowground warming. Aboveground warming is achieved by suspending two infrared radiators in the center of circular plots (3 m diameter), <i>c</i>. 1.5 m above the ground. Belowground warming is accomplished by inserting 20 1-m resistance-heating cables into stainless-steel rods and inserting them vertically into the ground. Two rings of heating cables are buried in the surface soil (5 cm) at 1 and 2 m diameters to compensate for surface heat loss. The control plots are installed with dummy heaters aboveground and unheated cables belowground.</div>\n</figcaption>\n</figure>\n<p>Such whole-ecosystem warming could provide new insights into a number of critical questions related to the thermal acclimation of terrestrial ecosystems in a warming world. For example, would aboveground and belowground processes (e.g. plant photosynthesis, leaf respiration, root respiration, and microbial respiration) acclimate to warming at the same pace? If not, what factors may explain their differences in the magnitude of thermal acclimation? Lu <i>et al</i>. show that evolutionary adaptation is likely to occur with longer warming, which may account for the decreasing response of plant phenology with time. As experimental duration increases, vegetation and microbial communities, and soil water and nutrient availability are likely to change over time. These changes in biotic and abiotic factors raise even more questions, such as how changes in species composition would modulate the thermal acclimation of terrestrial ecosystems? Would soil water and nutrients be significantly affected by long-term warming and then indirectly limit the thermal responses of terrestrial ecosystems?</p>\n<p>Results from whole-ecosystem warming experiments are likely to reveal emergent patterns and mechanisms of ecosystem responses to warming, which will be highly valuable for benchmarking models. Future advances in this research area should further integrate these field data with models that exclude other covariates to infer causality between temperature and ecosystem responses, as it is difficult to discern the intrinsic effect of warming on land ecosystems in the real world. These data-model integrative studies will greatly reduce modeling uncertainties and accurately capture the warming response of terrestrial ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal acclimation of ecosystem processes to climate warming\",\"authors\":\"Jinsong Wang, Shuli Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.20131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>The Earth's climate is changing rapidly, with temperature increases posing significant challenges to the biosphere. How the timing of life-history events in organisms, which is closely linked to many ecosystem functions, responds to increasing global temperatures is an emerging ecological frontier (Liu <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). In a recent <i>New Phytologist</i> article, Lu <i>et al</i>. (<span>2024</span>, doi: 10.1111/nph.20019) show that plant phenology responses to elevated temperatures level off with warming magnitude and experimental duration. This provides solid empirical evidence for the acclimation of plant phenology to higher and longer warming. <blockquote><p>‘In addition to the activities related to these recurring biological events, other ecosystem processes are likely to acclimate to climate warming as well.’</p>\\n<div></div>\\n</blockquote>\\n</div>\\n<p>Plant phenology has showed complex responses to climate warming, with implications for a wide range of ecosystem functions and services. However, whether the responses of plant phenophases will strengthen or weaken with greater degrees of warming or long-term warming remains a challenge for ecological research. Using a global meta-analysis of 103 experimental warming studies, Lu <i>et al</i>. show that: (1) the response of plant phenology levels off with increasing warming magnitude for herbaceous plants, but not for woody plants; and (2) warming effects on plant phenology also diminish with longer experimental duration, and the slowed rates are regulated by climatic factors. Although previous studies have already found the attenuated leaf-out response to rising warming magnitude in temperate species (Fu <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>), the study by Lu <i>et al</i>. provides new evidence for long-term thermal acclimation of different plant phenophases at the global scale. These findings highlight that as climate warming continues; shifts in plant phenology may be less than anticipated.</p>\\n<p>In addition to the activities related to these recurring biological events, other ecosystem processes are likely to acclimate to climate warming as well. For example, it is well characterized that plant photosynthesis increases with temperature and reaches an optimum temperature, beyond which photosynthetic rates decline (Sendall <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>). Gross primary production (GPP), which is jointly controlled by plant phenology and photosynthesis (Xia <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>), generally increases with temperature until it reaches an optimal temperature, beyond which GPP declines at higher temperatures (Fig. 1) (Huang <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>; Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Similarly, recent studies suggest widespread optimum temperatures of respiration at leaves, microbes, and ecosystems to global scales (Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). The widespread thermal optimality of GPP also leads to an optimum temperature of net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide world-wide, as revealed by 169 global eddy covariance sites (Niu <i>et al</i>., <span>2012</span>). The optimum temperatures of these carbon fluxes generally increase with environment temperatures (Crous <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Chen <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>; Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>), suggesting thermal acclimation of ecosystem carbon cycling (Fig. 1). The thermal optimality and acclimation of these broad ecosystem processes has implications for climate change. For example, the thermal optimality of ecosystem respiration over the globe implies that the previous interpretation of a universal exponential relationship between terrestrial ecosystem respiration and temperature may overestimate the positive feedbacks between climate change and the carbon cycle (Chen <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>).</p>\\n<figure><picture>\\n<source media=\\\"(min-width: 1650px)\\\" srcset=\\\"/cms/asset/58d08e25-e9c3-49c8-8ebb-319d822fbd45/nph20131-fig-0001-m.jpg\\\"/><img alt=\\\"Details are in the caption following the image\\\" data-lg-src=\\\"/cms/asset/58d08e25-e9c3-49c8-8ebb-319d822fbd45/nph20131-fig-0001-m.jpg\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"/cms/asset/f6588d35-4de7-4a8a-a556-8f7317488d1d/nph20131-fig-0001-m.png\\\" title=\\\"Details are in the caption following the image\\\"/></picture><figcaption>\\n<div><strong>Fig. 1<span style=\\\"font-weight:normal\\\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer<i aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\"></i><span>PowerPoint</span></div>\\n</div>\\n<div>Thermal optimality of gross primary production (GPP) from six representative sites of FLUXNET over different temperature zones (MAT ranges from −10.4–10.5°C). At all six sites, GPP increases with temperature in the low range, reaches a maximum, and then declines in the high range. Warmer sites, which are more adaptable to warming, have a higher optimum temperature than colder sites. US-ATQ: Atqasuk, USA (MAT = −10.4°C); CA-QFO: Eastern Boreal, Mature Black Spruce, Canada (MAT = 1.0°C); CA-GRO: Groundhog River, Boreal Mixedwood Forest, Canada (MAT = 3.2°C); US-UMD: UMBS Disturbance, USA (MAT = 7.1°C); DE-SPW: Spreewald, Germany (MAT = 10.4°C); US-OHO: Oak Openings, USA (MAT = 10.5°C).</div>\\n</figcaption>\\n</figure>\\n<p>Thermal acclimation of these ecosystem processes is caused by various mechanisms, such as enzyme deactivation, changes in organism physiology, or a shift in community composition, and can be regulated by temperature-dependent abiotic factors (e.g. soil moisture, nutrient availability, and nonstructural plant carbohydrates). When temperature increases over shorter time scales (e.g. hours, days or seasons), the response of ecosystem processes is predominantly driven by physiological responses. For instance, enzyme activities and metabolic rates may be inhibited at high temperatures (Atkin &amp; Tjoelker, <span>2003</span>), resulting in unimodal temperature responses of ecosystem processes. However, when temperature increases over years or decades, evolutionary adaptation may occur, with less adaptive species being replaced by more thermo-tolerant ones (McGaughran <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Thus, changes in vegetation or microbial communities under long-term warming may lead to the thermal adaptation of terrestrial ecosystems (Melillo <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). However, the rates at which different life forms respond may vary significantly; for instance, Lu <i>et al</i>. showed that although the phenological responses of both herbaceous and woody plants decreased over time, herbaceous species are more likely to undergo rapid evolutionary adaptation than woody plants due to their higher evolutionary rates.</p>\\n<p>Lu <i>et al</i>. also stated that other limiting factors, such as soil water, nutrient availability, and photosynthetic substrates, may become more important and constrain phenological responses to rising temperatures over longer periods. Similarly, a previous study illustrates that the pace of GPP acclimation and adaptation is slower in water-limited regions, as revealed by 326 eddy covariance sites over the globe (Wang <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>), suggesting that humid regions will benefit more than dry and warm regions in terms of carbon uptake from vegetation adaptation to future warming. Together, these findings highlight that resource limitations or co-limitation will increasingly govern ecosystem processes in response to long-term climate warming.</p>\\n<p>Although there is growing evidence of thermal acclimation in terrestrial ecosystems at different levels of organization in response to warming, the interplay between the acclimation of aboveground and belowground processes, as well as the underlying mechanisms, remains unclear. Previous studies have found that belowground phenology, such as the phenology of roots, microbes and soil fauna often responds asynchronously, when compared to aboveground phenology, in response to warming (Liu <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>; Yin <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Building on findings from Lu <i>et al</i>., it is imperative to conduct whole-ecosystem field experiments with both above- and belowground warming (Fig. 2) in diverse ecosystems to disentangle the degree of thermal acclimation for different organisms (e.g. leaves, roots, soil microbes and fauna) and various ecological processes related to ecosystem functioning and services. These whole-ecosystem warming experiments should provide a crucial step and enrich existing experiments, which mostly focus on the aboveground.</p>\\n<figure><picture>\\n<source media=\\\"(min-width: 1650px)\\\" srcset=\\\"/cms/asset/9f3564c9-7b79-40dc-866b-c7212906aae7/nph20131-fig-0002-m.jpg\\\"/><img alt=\\\"Details are in the caption following the image\\\" data-lg-src=\\\"/cms/asset/9f3564c9-7b79-40dc-866b-c7212906aae7/nph20131-fig-0002-m.jpg\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"/cms/asset/21231957-c6c7-46bb-a3fb-1270fdf3643d/nph20131-fig-0002-m.png\\\" title=\\\"Details are in the caption following the image\\\"/></picture><figcaption>\\n<div><strong>Fig. 2<span style=\\\"font-weight:normal\\\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer<i aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\"></i><span>PowerPoint</span></div>\\n</div>\\n<div>Schematic diagram (a) and picture (b) of a whole-ecosystem warming experiment in an alpine peatland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China (33°7′17″N, 102°38′26″E). The manipulative experiment was set up in a fen in 2022 to simulate above- and belowground warming. Aboveground warming is achieved by suspending two infrared radiators in the center of circular plots (3 m diameter), <i>c</i>. 1.5 m above the ground. Belowground warming is accomplished by inserting 20 1-m resistance-heating cables into stainless-steel rods and inserting them vertically into the ground. Two rings of heating cables are buried in the surface soil (5 cm) at 1 and 2 m diameters to compensate for surface heat loss. The control plots are installed with dummy heaters aboveground and unheated cables belowground.</div>\\n</figcaption>\\n</figure>\\n<p>Such whole-ecosystem warming could provide new insights into a number of critical questions related to the thermal acclimation of terrestrial ecosystems in a warming world. For example, would aboveground and belowground processes (e.g. plant photosynthesis, leaf respiration, root respiration, and microbial respiration) acclimate to warming at the same pace? If not, what factors may explain their differences in the magnitude of thermal acclimation? Lu <i>et al</i>. show that evolutionary adaptation is likely to occur with longer warming, which may account for the decreasing response of plant phenology with time. As experimental duration increases, vegetation and microbial communities, and soil water and nutrient availability are likely to change over time. These changes in biotic and abiotic factors raise even more questions, such as how changes in species composition would modulate the thermal acclimation of terrestrial ecosystems? Would soil water and nutrients be significantly affected by long-term warming and then indirectly limit the thermal responses of terrestrial ecosystems?</p>\\n<p>Results from whole-ecosystem warming experiments are likely to reveal emergent patterns and mechanisms of ecosystem responses to warming, which will be highly valuable for benchmarking models. Future advances in this research area should further integrate these field data with models that exclude other covariates to infer causality between temperature and ecosystem responses, as it is difficult to discern the intrinsic effect of warming on land ecosystems in the real world. These data-model integrative studies will greatly reduce modeling uncertainties and accurately capture the warming response of terrestrial ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20131\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

然而,当气温持续数年或数十年升高时,可能会出现进化适应,适应性较差的物种会被耐热性更强的物种所取代(McGaughran 等人,2021 年)。因此,在长期变暖的情况下,植被或微生物群落的变化可能会导致陆地生态系统的热适应(Melillo 等,2017 年)。然而,不同生命形式的反应速度可能会有很大差异;例如,Lu 等人的研究表明,虽然草本植物和木本植物的物候反应都会随着时间的推移而降低,但草本物种由于进化速度较快,比木本植物更有可能经历快速的进化适应。Lu 等人还指出,土壤水分、养分供应和光合基质等其他限制因素可能会变得更加重要,并在较长时期内制约对温度上升的物候反应。同样,之前的一项研究表明,全球 326 个涡度协方差站点显示,在水分有限的地区,GPP 的适应速度较慢(Wang 等人,2023 年),这表明在植被适应未来变暖的过程中,潮湿地区将比干旱和温暖地区更能吸收碳。尽管越来越多的证据表明,陆地生态系统在不同组织水平上的热适应对气候变暖做出了反应,但地上和地下过程适应之间的相互作用及其内在机制仍不清楚。以往的研究发现,与地上物候相比,地下物候,如根系、微生物和土壤动物的物候,往往对气候变暖做出不同步的反应(Liu 等,2022 年;Yin 等,2023 年)。根据 Lu 等人的研究结果,必须在不同的生态系统中进行地上和地下变暖的全生态系统实地实验(图 2),以区分不同生物(如叶、根、土壤微生物和动物)的热适应程度以及与生态系统功能和服务相关的各种生态过程。这些全生态系统增温实验将迈出关键的一步,并丰富现有的实验(这些实验大多集中在地上部分)。操纵实验于 2022 年在一个沼泽地中进行,以模拟地面和地下增温。通过在离地面约 1.5 米的圆形地块(直径 3 米)中心悬挂两个红外线辐射器来实现地面增温。地下加温是通过将 20 根 1 米长的电阻加热电缆插入不锈钢棒并垂直插入地下来实现的。在地表土壤(5 厘米)中埋入两圈直径分别为 1 米和 2 米的加热电缆,以补偿地表热量损失。这样的全生态系统加温可以让人们对一些关键问题有新的认识,这些问题与变暖世界中陆地生态系统的热适应有关。例如,地面和地下过程(如植物光合作用、叶呼吸、根呼吸和微生物呼吸)是否会以同样的速度适应气候变暖?如果不是,哪些因素可以解释它们在热适应程度上的差异?Lu 等人的研究表明,进化适应可能会随着变暖时间的延长而发生,这可能是植物物候反应随时间推移而减弱的原因。随着实验持续时间的延长,植被和微生物群落以及土壤水分和养分的可用性可能会随时间发生变化。这些生物和非生物因素的变化提出了更多问题,例如物种组成的变化将如何调节陆地生态系统的热适应?土壤水分和养分是否会受到长期变暖的显著影响,进而间接限制陆地生态系统的热响应?整个生态系统变暖实验的结果很可能会揭示生态系统对变暖响应的新模式和新机制,这对模型的基准设定非常有价值。这一研究领域的未来进展应进一步将这些实地数据与排除其他协变量的模型结合起来,以推断温度与生态系统反应之间的因果关系,因为在现实世界中很难辨别气候变暖对陆地生态系统的内在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermal acclimation of ecosystem processes to climate warming
The Earth's climate is changing rapidly, with temperature increases posing significant challenges to the biosphere. How the timing of life-history events in organisms, which is closely linked to many ecosystem functions, responds to increasing global temperatures is an emerging ecological frontier (Liu et al., 2022). In a recent New Phytologist article, Lu et al. (2024, doi: 10.1111/nph.20019) show that plant phenology responses to elevated temperatures level off with warming magnitude and experimental duration. This provides solid empirical evidence for the acclimation of plant phenology to higher and longer warming.

‘In addition to the activities related to these recurring biological events, other ecosystem processes are likely to acclimate to climate warming as well.’

Plant phenology has showed complex responses to climate warming, with implications for a wide range of ecosystem functions and services. However, whether the responses of plant phenophases will strengthen or weaken with greater degrees of warming or long-term warming remains a challenge for ecological research. Using a global meta-analysis of 103 experimental warming studies, Lu et al. show that: (1) the response of plant phenology levels off with increasing warming magnitude for herbaceous plants, but not for woody plants; and (2) warming effects on plant phenology also diminish with longer experimental duration, and the slowed rates are regulated by climatic factors. Although previous studies have already found the attenuated leaf-out response to rising warming magnitude in temperate species (Fu et al., 2015), the study by Lu et al. provides new evidence for long-term thermal acclimation of different plant phenophases at the global scale. These findings highlight that as climate warming continues; shifts in plant phenology may be less than anticipated.

In addition to the activities related to these recurring biological events, other ecosystem processes are likely to acclimate to climate warming as well. For example, it is well characterized that plant photosynthesis increases with temperature and reaches an optimum temperature, beyond which photosynthetic rates decline (Sendall et al., 2015). Gross primary production (GPP), which is jointly controlled by plant phenology and photosynthesis (Xia et al., 2015), generally increases with temperature until it reaches an optimal temperature, beyond which GPP declines at higher temperatures (Fig. 1) (Huang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2023). Similarly, recent studies suggest widespread optimum temperatures of respiration at leaves, microbes, and ecosystems to global scales (Niu et al., 2024). The widespread thermal optimality of GPP also leads to an optimum temperature of net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide world-wide, as revealed by 169 global eddy covariance sites (Niu et al., 2012). The optimum temperatures of these carbon fluxes generally increase with environment temperatures (Crous et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023), suggesting thermal acclimation of ecosystem carbon cycling (Fig. 1). The thermal optimality and acclimation of these broad ecosystem processes has implications for climate change. For example, the thermal optimality of ecosystem respiration over the globe implies that the previous interpretation of a universal exponential relationship between terrestrial ecosystem respiration and temperature may overestimate the positive feedbacks between climate change and the carbon cycle (Chen et al., 2023).

Details are in the caption following the image
Fig. 1
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Thermal optimality of gross primary production (GPP) from six representative sites of FLUXNET over different temperature zones (MAT ranges from −10.4–10.5°C). At all six sites, GPP increases with temperature in the low range, reaches a maximum, and then declines in the high range. Warmer sites, which are more adaptable to warming, have a higher optimum temperature than colder sites. US-ATQ: Atqasuk, USA (MAT = −10.4°C); CA-QFO: Eastern Boreal, Mature Black Spruce, Canada (MAT = 1.0°C); CA-GRO: Groundhog River, Boreal Mixedwood Forest, Canada (MAT = 3.2°C); US-UMD: UMBS Disturbance, USA (MAT = 7.1°C); DE-SPW: Spreewald, Germany (MAT = 10.4°C); US-OHO: Oak Openings, USA (MAT = 10.5°C).

Thermal acclimation of these ecosystem processes is caused by various mechanisms, such as enzyme deactivation, changes in organism physiology, or a shift in community composition, and can be regulated by temperature-dependent abiotic factors (e.g. soil moisture, nutrient availability, and nonstructural plant carbohydrates). When temperature increases over shorter time scales (e.g. hours, days or seasons), the response of ecosystem processes is predominantly driven by physiological responses. For instance, enzyme activities and metabolic rates may be inhibited at high temperatures (Atkin & Tjoelker, 2003), resulting in unimodal temperature responses of ecosystem processes. However, when temperature increases over years or decades, evolutionary adaptation may occur, with less adaptive species being replaced by more thermo-tolerant ones (McGaughran et al., 2021). Thus, changes in vegetation or microbial communities under long-term warming may lead to the thermal adaptation of terrestrial ecosystems (Melillo et al., 2017). However, the rates at which different life forms respond may vary significantly; for instance, Lu et al. showed that although the phenological responses of both herbaceous and woody plants decreased over time, herbaceous species are more likely to undergo rapid evolutionary adaptation than woody plants due to their higher evolutionary rates.

Lu et al. also stated that other limiting factors, such as soil water, nutrient availability, and photosynthetic substrates, may become more important and constrain phenological responses to rising temperatures over longer periods. Similarly, a previous study illustrates that the pace of GPP acclimation and adaptation is slower in water-limited regions, as revealed by 326 eddy covariance sites over the globe (Wang et al., 2023), suggesting that humid regions will benefit more than dry and warm regions in terms of carbon uptake from vegetation adaptation to future warming. Together, these findings highlight that resource limitations or co-limitation will increasingly govern ecosystem processes in response to long-term climate warming.

Although there is growing evidence of thermal acclimation in terrestrial ecosystems at different levels of organization in response to warming, the interplay between the acclimation of aboveground and belowground processes, as well as the underlying mechanisms, remains unclear. Previous studies have found that belowground phenology, such as the phenology of roots, microbes and soil fauna often responds asynchronously, when compared to aboveground phenology, in response to warming (Liu et al., 2022; Yin et al., 2023). Building on findings from Lu et al., it is imperative to conduct whole-ecosystem field experiments with both above- and belowground warming (Fig. 2) in diverse ecosystems to disentangle the degree of thermal acclimation for different organisms (e.g. leaves, roots, soil microbes and fauna) and various ecological processes related to ecosystem functioning and services. These whole-ecosystem warming experiments should provide a crucial step and enrich existing experiments, which mostly focus on the aboveground.

Details are in the caption following the image
Fig. 2
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Schematic diagram (a) and picture (b) of a whole-ecosystem warming experiment in an alpine peatland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China (33°7′17″N, 102°38′26″E). The manipulative experiment was set up in a fen in 2022 to simulate above- and belowground warming. Aboveground warming is achieved by suspending two infrared radiators in the center of circular plots (3 m diameter), c. 1.5 m above the ground. Belowground warming is accomplished by inserting 20 1-m resistance-heating cables into stainless-steel rods and inserting them vertically into the ground. Two rings of heating cables are buried in the surface soil (5 cm) at 1 and 2 m diameters to compensate for surface heat loss. The control plots are installed with dummy heaters aboveground and unheated cables belowground.

Such whole-ecosystem warming could provide new insights into a number of critical questions related to the thermal acclimation of terrestrial ecosystems in a warming world. For example, would aboveground and belowground processes (e.g. plant photosynthesis, leaf respiration, root respiration, and microbial respiration) acclimate to warming at the same pace? If not, what factors may explain their differences in the magnitude of thermal acclimation? Lu et al. show that evolutionary adaptation is likely to occur with longer warming, which may account for the decreasing response of plant phenology with time. As experimental duration increases, vegetation and microbial communities, and soil water and nutrient availability are likely to change over time. These changes in biotic and abiotic factors raise even more questions, such as how changes in species composition would modulate the thermal acclimation of terrestrial ecosystems? Would soil water and nutrients be significantly affected by long-term warming and then indirectly limit the thermal responses of terrestrial ecosystems?

Results from whole-ecosystem warming experiments are likely to reveal emergent patterns and mechanisms of ecosystem responses to warming, which will be highly valuable for benchmarking models. Future advances in this research area should further integrate these field data with models that exclude other covariates to infer causality between temperature and ecosystem responses, as it is difficult to discern the intrinsic effect of warming on land ecosystems in the real world. These data-model integrative studies will greatly reduce modeling uncertainties and accurately capture the warming response of terrestrial ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信