Danielle L. Wilson, Carley Whenn, Maree Barnes, Susan P. Walker, Mark E. Howard
{"title":"预防孕期仰卧睡眠的体位调整装置：随机交叉试验","authors":"Danielle L. Wilson, Carley Whenn, Maree Barnes, Susan P. Walker, Mark E. Howard","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of a pillow-like position modification device to reduce supine sleep during late pregnancy, and to determine the impacts on the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and foetal well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Randomised cross-over study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting and Population</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals in the third trimester of pregnancy receiving antenatal care at a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants used their own pillow for a control week and an intervention pillow for a week overnight, in randomised order. Sleep position and total sleep time for each night of both weeks were objectively monitored, with a sleep study and foetal heart rate monitoring performed on the last night of each week.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Primary outcome = percentage of sleep time in the supine position; secondary outcomes = apnoea–hypopnoea index, foetal heart rate decelerations and birthweight centile.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-one individuals were randomised with data collected on 35 participants over 469 nights. There was no difference in percentage of total sleep time in the supine position overnight between the control or intervention pillow week (13.0% [6.1, 25.5] vs. 16.0% [5.6, 27.2], <i>p</i> = 0.81 with a mean difference of 2.5% [95% CI] = −0.7, 5.6, <i>p</i> = 0.12), and no difference in the severity of SDB or foetal heart rate decelerations across weeks. However, increased supine sleep was significantly related to a higher apnoea–hypopnoea index (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.003), lower birthweight (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = −0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and lower birthweight centile (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = −0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.006). The proportion of supine sleep each night of the week varied widely both within and across participants, despite awareness of side-sleeping recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found no evidence to suggest that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was effective in late pregnancy, with women spending an average of 1 h per night supine. Alternative devices should be investigated, incorporating lessons learnt from this study to inform trials of supine sleep minimisation in pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical Trial: (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12620000371998</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 2","pages":"145-154"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17952","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Position Modification Device for the Prevention of Supine Sleep During Pregnancy: A Randomised Crossover Trial\",\"authors\":\"Danielle L. Wilson, Carley Whenn, Maree Barnes, Susan P. Walker, Mark E. Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of a pillow-like position modification device to reduce supine sleep during late pregnancy, and to determine the impacts on the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and foetal well-being.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Randomised cross-over study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting and Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals in the third trimester of pregnancy receiving antenatal care at a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants used their own pillow for a control week and an intervention pillow for a week overnight, in randomised order. Sleep position and total sleep time for each night of both weeks were objectively monitored, with a sleep study and foetal heart rate monitoring performed on the last night of each week.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primary outcome = percentage of sleep time in the supine position; secondary outcomes = apnoea–hypopnoea index, foetal heart rate decelerations and birthweight centile.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-one individuals were randomised with data collected on 35 participants over 469 nights. There was no difference in percentage of total sleep time in the supine position overnight between the control or intervention pillow week (13.0% [6.1, 25.5] vs. 16.0% [5.6, 27.2], <i>p</i> = 0.81 with a mean difference of 2.5% [95% CI] = −0.7, 5.6, <i>p</i> = 0.12), and no difference in the severity of SDB or foetal heart rate decelerations across weeks. However, increased supine sleep was significantly related to a higher apnoea–hypopnoea index (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.003), lower birthweight (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = −0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and lower birthweight centile (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = −0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.006). The proportion of supine sleep each night of the week varied widely both within and across participants, despite awareness of side-sleeping recommendations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found no evidence to suggest that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was effective in late pregnancy, with women spending an average of 1 h per night supine. Alternative devices should be investigated, incorporating lessons learnt from this study to inform trials of supine sleep minimisation in pregnancy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical Trial: (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12620000371998</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 2\",\"pages\":\"145-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17952\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17952\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Position Modification Device for the Prevention of Supine Sleep During Pregnancy: A Randomised Crossover Trial
Objective
To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of a pillow-like position modification device to reduce supine sleep during late pregnancy, and to determine the impacts on the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and foetal well-being.
Design
Randomised cross-over study.
Setting and Population
Individuals in the third trimester of pregnancy receiving antenatal care at a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia.
Methods
Participants used their own pillow for a control week and an intervention pillow for a week overnight, in randomised order. Sleep position and total sleep time for each night of both weeks were objectively monitored, with a sleep study and foetal heart rate monitoring performed on the last night of each week.
Main Outcome Measures
Primary outcome = percentage of sleep time in the supine position; secondary outcomes = apnoea–hypopnoea index, foetal heart rate decelerations and birthweight centile.
Results
Forty-one individuals were randomised with data collected on 35 participants over 469 nights. There was no difference in percentage of total sleep time in the supine position overnight between the control or intervention pillow week (13.0% [6.1, 25.5] vs. 16.0% [5.6, 27.2], p = 0.81 with a mean difference of 2.5% [95% CI] = −0.7, 5.6, p = 0.12), and no difference in the severity of SDB or foetal heart rate decelerations across weeks. However, increased supine sleep was significantly related to a higher apnoea–hypopnoea index (rs = 0.37, p = 0.003), lower birthweight (rs = −0.45, p = 0.007) and lower birthweight centile (rs = −0.45, p = 0.006). The proportion of supine sleep each night of the week varied widely both within and across participants, despite awareness of side-sleeping recommendations.
Conclusions
We found no evidence to suggest that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was effective in late pregnancy, with women spending an average of 1 h per night supine. Alternative devices should be investigated, incorporating lessons learnt from this study to inform trials of supine sleep minimisation in pregnancy.
Trial Registration
Clinical Trial: (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12620000371998
期刊介绍：
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
