基于机器学习和微量元素地球化学的新型闪锌矿温度计

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hongtao Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yongjun Shao, Jia Liao, Shuling Song, Genshen Cao, Ruichang Tan
{"title":"基于机器学习和微量元素地球化学的新型闪锌矿温度计","authors":"Hongtao Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yongjun Shao, Jia Liao, Shuling Song, Genshen Cao, Ruichang Tan","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry\",\"authors\":\"Hongtao Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yongjun Shao, Jia Liao, Shuling Song, Genshen Cao, Ruichang Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

矿化温度测定是经济地质学研究的基础,但如何量化整个矿化过程的温度仍然是一项挑战。闪锌矿在各种类型的矿床中无处不在,在铅锌矿床中尤为丰富,其微量元素组成与温度有关,因此是地温测定法的理想候选元素。在这里,我们首先编制了一个全球闪锌矿痕量元素组成数据集(n = 1416,T = 75-430 °C),涵盖了不同的铅锌矿床类型(密西西比河谷型、热液型、沉积-喷出型、矽卡岩型和火山块状硫化物矿床)。在按照统计规范进行数据处理后,采用不同的机器学习算法(随机森林(RF)、梯度提升决策树、人工神经网络、最小绝对收缩和选择算子、支持向量机、k-近邻和线性回归)来训练不同的模型,以探索闪锌矿形成温度与痕量元素地球化学之间的潜在联系。采用留一交叉验证法评估了每个模型的性能,结果表明 RF(R2 = 0.88,RMSE = 26 °C)是性能最好的算法。同时,五倍交叉验证结果表明,RF 模型(R2 = 0.87,RMSE = 25 °C)优于 GGIMFis 温度计(R2 = 0.53,RMSE = 50 °C)。同时,特征重要性分析表明,Ge 和 Mn 对温度预测有显著影响,因为高温通常有利于 Mn 而非 Ge 融入闪锌矿结构。最后,利用整个数据集训练了一个模型,生成了适用于中低温(75-430 °C)热液环境的可靠闪锌矿温度计(SPRFT 软件,此处免费提供)。该 SPRFT 温度计被用于评估四川-云南-贵州铅锌成矿带(中国西南部)的铅锌矿化温度,为矿石流体演化提供了一个创新的视角。该研究展示了一种利用机器学习计算成矿温度的稳健方法。这种新颖的方法为研究和重新计算更多的矿物地温仪开辟了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry

A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry

Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R2 = 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信