中高风险绝经前激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的患者报告结果和生存率:在一项真实世界研究中比较托瑞米芬和芳香化酶抑制剂

IF 10.7 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
MedComm Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1002/mco2.698
Yaping Yang, Fengxia Gan, Ting Luo, Qun Lin, Wenqian Yang, Lili Chen, Wei Zhang, Qiang Liu, Chang Gong
{"title":"中高风险绝经前激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的患者报告结果和生存率:在一项真实世界研究中比较托瑞米芬和芳香化酶抑制剂","authors":"Yaping Yang,&nbsp;Fengxia Gan,&nbsp;Ting Luo,&nbsp;Qun Lin,&nbsp;Wenqian Yang,&nbsp;Lili Chen,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Qiang Liu,&nbsp;Chang Gong","doi":"10.1002/mco2.698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is commonly used in China for premenopausal breast cancer patients. This real-world study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) and survival between toremifene and aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in patients with moderate-/high-risk premenopausal hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PROs, assessed using SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires between January and March 2023. A total of 392 patients were included, with 171 receiving toremifene and 221 receiving AI. The toremifene group showed significantly higher scores in the role physical (<i>p</i> = 0.034) and mental health (<i>p </i>= 0.009) dimensions of SF-36 and lower anxiety/depression (AD) scores (<i>p </i>= 0.038) in EQ-5D-5L compared to AI group. The estimated 5- and 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were similar in toremifene and AI groups: 96.5% versus 91.9%, and 87.4% versus 87.8% (<i>p </i>= 0.39), respectively. Adverse event rates were similar in two groups, except for a greater risk of endometrial thickening (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.001) and a lower occurrence of morning stiffness (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.001) in the toremifene compared to the AI group. Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients receiving toremifene plus OFS had better role physical and mental health outcomes and lower AD dimensions than those receiving AI plus OFS. Both treatments had comparable DFS and favorable tolerability profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":94133,"journal":{"name":"MedComm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.698","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcome and survival in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at moderate to high risk: comparing toremifene with aromatase inhibitor in a real-world study\",\"authors\":\"Yaping Yang,&nbsp;Fengxia Gan,&nbsp;Ting Luo,&nbsp;Qun Lin,&nbsp;Wenqian Yang,&nbsp;Lili Chen,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Qiang Liu,&nbsp;Chang Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mco2.698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is commonly used in China for premenopausal breast cancer patients. This real-world study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) and survival between toremifene and aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in patients with moderate-/high-risk premenopausal hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PROs, assessed using SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires between January and March 2023. A total of 392 patients were included, with 171 receiving toremifene and 221 receiving AI. The toremifene group showed significantly higher scores in the role physical (<i>p</i> = 0.034) and mental health (<i>p </i>= 0.009) dimensions of SF-36 and lower anxiety/depression (AD) scores (<i>p </i>= 0.038) in EQ-5D-5L compared to AI group. The estimated 5- and 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were similar in toremifene and AI groups: 96.5% versus 91.9%, and 87.4% versus 87.8% (<i>p </i>= 0.39), respectively. Adverse event rates were similar in two groups, except for a greater risk of endometrial thickening (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.001) and a lower occurrence of morning stiffness (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.001) in the toremifene compared to the AI group. Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients receiving toremifene plus OFS had better role physical and mental health outcomes and lower AD dimensions than those receiving AI plus OFS. Both treatments had comparable DFS and favorable tolerability profiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedComm\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.698\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedComm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

托瑞米芬是一种选择性雌激素受体调节剂,在中国常用于治疗绝经前乳腺癌患者。这项真实世界研究旨在比较托瑞米芬与芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)加卵巢功能抑制(OFS)治疗中度/高风险绝经前激素受体(HR)阳性乳腺癌患者的患者报告结果(PRO)和生存率。主要终点是PROs,在2023年1月至3月期间使用SF-36和EQ-5D-5L问卷进行评估。该研究共纳入了392名患者,其中171人接受了托瑞米芬治疗,221人接受了人工受孕治疗。与人工流产组相比,托瑞米芬组在SF-36的生理作用(p = 0.034)和心理健康(p = 0.009)维度上的得分明显更高,而在EQ-5D-5L中的焦虑/抑郁(AD)得分(p = 0.038)则更低。估计的 5 年和 8 年无病生存率(DFS)在托瑞米芬组和人工受精组相似:分别为 96.5% 对 91.9% 和 87.4% 对 87.8% (p = 0.39)。两组的不良事件发生率相似,但托瑞米芬组比人工授精组发生子宫内膜增厚的风险更高(p <0.001),发生晨僵的风险更低(p <0.001)。接受托瑞米芬+OFS治疗的绝经前HR阳性乳腺癌患者与接受AI+OFS治疗的患者相比,具有更好的身心健康效果和更低的AD维度。两种治疗方法的 DFS 和耐受性情况相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient-reported outcome and survival in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at moderate to high risk: comparing toremifene with aromatase inhibitor in a real-world study

Patient-reported outcome and survival in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at moderate to high risk: comparing toremifene with aromatase inhibitor in a real-world study

Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is commonly used in China for premenopausal breast cancer patients. This real-world study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) and survival between toremifene and aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in patients with moderate-/high-risk premenopausal hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PROs, assessed using SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires between January and March 2023. A total of 392 patients were included, with 171 receiving toremifene and 221 receiving AI. The toremifene group showed significantly higher scores in the role physical (p = 0.034) and mental health (= 0.009) dimensions of SF-36 and lower anxiety/depression (AD) scores (= 0.038) in EQ-5D-5L compared to AI group. The estimated 5- and 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were similar in toremifene and AI groups: 96.5% versus 91.9%, and 87.4% versus 87.8% (= 0.39), respectively. Adverse event rates were similar in two groups, except for a greater risk of endometrial thickening (< 0.001) and a lower occurrence of morning stiffness (< 0.001) in the toremifene compared to the AI group. Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients receiving toremifene plus OFS had better role physical and mental health outcomes and lower AD dimensions than those receiving AI plus OFS. Both treatments had comparable DFS and favorable tolerability profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信