Alexander J Bell,Sundaresh Ram,Wassim W Labaki,Susan Murray,Ella A Kazerooni,Stefanie Galban,Fernando J Martinez,Charles R Hatt,Jennifer M Wang,Vladimir Ivanov,Paul McGettigan,Edward Khokhlovich,Enrico Maiorino,Rahul Suryadevara,Adel Boueiz,Peter Castaldi,Evgeny M Mirkes,Andrei Zinovyev,Alexander N Gorban,Craig J Galban,MeiLan K Han
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病表型的时间探索:从 COPDGene 和 SPIROMICS 群体中获得的启示。","authors":"Alexander J Bell,Sundaresh Ram,Wassim W Labaki,Susan Murray,Ella A Kazerooni,Stefanie Galban,Fernando J Martinez,Charles R Hatt,Jennifer M Wang,Vladimir Ivanov,Paul McGettigan,Edward Khokhlovich,Enrico Maiorino,Rahul Suryadevara,Adel Boueiz,Peter Castaldi,Evgeny M Mirkes,Andrei Zinovyev,Alexander N Gorban,Craig J Galban,MeiLan K Han","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202401-0127oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibits considerable progression heterogeneity. We hypothesized that elastic principal graph analysis (EPGA) would identify distinct clinical phenotypes and their longitudinal relationships.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nCross-sectional data from 8,972 tobacco-exposed COPDGene participants, with and without COPD, were used to train a model with EPGA, using thirty clinical, physiologic and CT features. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce data dimensionality to six principal components. An elastic principal tree was fitted to the reduced space. 4,585 participants from COPDGene Phase 2 were used to test longitudinal trajectories. 2,652 participants from SPIROMICS tested external reproducibility.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOur analysis used cross-sectional data to create an elastic principal tree, where the concept of time is represented by distance on the tree. Six clinically distinct tree segments were identified that differed by lung function, symptoms, and CT features: 1) Subclinical (SC); 2) Parenchymal Abnormality (PA); 3) Chronic Bronchitis (CB); 4) Emphysema Male (EM); 5) Emphysema Female (EF); and 6) Severe Airways (SA) disease. Cross-sectional SPIROMICS data confirmed similar groupings. 5-year data from COPDGene mapped longitudinal changes onto the tree. 29% of patients changed segment during follow-up; longitudinal trajectories confirmed a net flow of patients along the tree, from SC towards Emphysema, although alternative trajectories were noted, through airway disease predominant phenotypes, CB and SA.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis novel analytic methodology provides an approach to defining longitudinal phenotypic trajectories using cross sectional data. These insights are clinically relevant and could facilitate precision therapy and future trials to modify disease progression.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Exploration of COPD Phenotypes: Insights from the COPDGene and SPIROMICS Cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander J Bell,Sundaresh Ram,Wassim W Labaki,Susan Murray,Ella A Kazerooni,Stefanie Galban,Fernando J Martinez,Charles R Hatt,Jennifer M Wang,Vladimir Ivanov,Paul McGettigan,Edward Khokhlovich,Enrico Maiorino,Rahul Suryadevara,Adel Boueiz,Peter Castaldi,Evgeny M Mirkes,Andrei Zinovyev,Alexander N Gorban,Craig J Galban,MeiLan K Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202401-0127oc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibits considerable progression heterogeneity. We hypothesized that elastic principal graph analysis (EPGA) would identify distinct clinical phenotypes and their longitudinal relationships.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nCross-sectional data from 8,972 tobacco-exposed COPDGene participants, with and without COPD, were used to train a model with EPGA, using thirty clinical, physiologic and CT features. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce data dimensionality to six principal components. An elastic principal tree was fitted to the reduced space. 4,585 participants from COPDGene Phase 2 were used to test longitudinal trajectories. 2,652 participants from SPIROMICS tested external reproducibility.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOur analysis used cross-sectional data to create an elastic principal tree, where the concept of time is represented by distance on the tree. Six clinically distinct tree segments were identified that differed by lung function, symptoms, and CT features: 1) Subclinical (SC); 2) Parenchymal Abnormality (PA); 3) Chronic Bronchitis (CB); 4) Emphysema Male (EM); 5) Emphysema Female (EF); and 6) Severe Airways (SA) disease. Cross-sectional SPIROMICS data confirmed similar groupings. 5-year data from COPDGene mapped longitudinal changes onto the tree. 29% of patients changed segment during follow-up; longitudinal trajectories confirmed a net flow of patients along the tree, from SC towards Emphysema, although alternative trajectories were noted, through airway disease predominant phenotypes, CB and SA.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis novel analytic methodology provides an approach to defining longitudinal phenotypic trajectories using cross sectional data. These insights are clinically relevant and could facilitate precision therapy and future trials to modify disease progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202401-0127oc\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202401-0127oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporal Exploration of COPD Phenotypes: Insights from the COPDGene and SPIROMICS Cohorts.
BACKGROUND
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibits considerable progression heterogeneity. We hypothesized that elastic principal graph analysis (EPGA) would identify distinct clinical phenotypes and their longitudinal relationships.
METHODS
Cross-sectional data from 8,972 tobacco-exposed COPDGene participants, with and without COPD, were used to train a model with EPGA, using thirty clinical, physiologic and CT features. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce data dimensionality to six principal components. An elastic principal tree was fitted to the reduced space. 4,585 participants from COPDGene Phase 2 were used to test longitudinal trajectories. 2,652 participants from SPIROMICS tested external reproducibility.
RESULTS
Our analysis used cross-sectional data to create an elastic principal tree, where the concept of time is represented by distance on the tree. Six clinically distinct tree segments were identified that differed by lung function, symptoms, and CT features: 1) Subclinical (SC); 2) Parenchymal Abnormality (PA); 3) Chronic Bronchitis (CB); 4) Emphysema Male (EM); 5) Emphysema Female (EF); and 6) Severe Airways (SA) disease. Cross-sectional SPIROMICS data confirmed similar groupings. 5-year data from COPDGene mapped longitudinal changes onto the tree. 29% of patients changed segment during follow-up; longitudinal trajectories confirmed a net flow of patients along the tree, from SC towards Emphysema, although alternative trajectories were noted, through airway disease predominant phenotypes, CB and SA.
CONCLUSION
This novel analytic methodology provides an approach to defining longitudinal phenotypic trajectories using cross sectional data. These insights are clinically relevant and could facilitate precision therapy and future trials to modify disease progression.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.