{"title":"中线腹膜外腹膜后淋巴结清扫术治疗生殖细胞瘤的11年经验","authors":"Muhannad Alsyouf,Alireza Ghoreifi,Arman Ashrafi,Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian,Hamed Ahmadi,Madeleine Burg,Antoin Douglawi,Qi Nie,Ming Li,Sumeet Bhanvadia,Anne Schuckman,Hooman Djaladat,Siamak Daneshmand","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nA midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 to 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, peri-operative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included recurrence free survival (2-year RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOverall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6) months. Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 (1.8-5.4)cm, of which 16 cases were > 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2(IQR 1-3) days. From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on POD1 and 89% by POD2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III-IV. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00); respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95); respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMidline EP-RPLND is safe, associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"46 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"11-Year Experience With Midline Extraperitoneal Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Germ Cell Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Muhannad Alsyouf,Alireza Ghoreifi,Arman Ashrafi,Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian,Hamed Ahmadi,Madeleine Burg,Antoin Douglawi,Qi Nie,Ming Li,Sumeet Bhanvadia,Anne Schuckman,Hooman Djaladat,Siamak Daneshmand\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju.0000000000004246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nA midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAll patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 to 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, peri-operative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included recurrence free survival (2-year RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOverall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6) months. Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 (1.8-5.4)cm, of which 16 cases were > 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2(IQR 1-3) days. From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on POD1 and 89% by POD2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III-IV. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00); respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95); respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nMidline EP-RPLND is safe, associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"101097JU0000000000004246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(EP-RPLND)采用中线腹膜外方法,与经腹膜方法相比,发病率较低。我们旨在回顾一家医疗机构11年来对生殖细胞瘤(GCT)患者进行EP-RPLND的经验。方法回顾2010年至2021年期间接受EP-RPLND的所有GCT患者。报告了手术、围手术期和肿瘤学结果。建立了一个逻辑回归模型来评估早期出院的预测变量。肿瘤学结果包括无复发生存期(2 年 RFS)和复发模式,根据病理学进行分析。结果总计有 237 名患者接受了 EP-RPLND,其中 72% 为化疗后(PC)患者。中位随访时间为16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6)个月。腹膜后疾病的中位尺寸为2.8(1.8-5.4)厘米,其中16例大于10厘米。没有出现术后回肠梗阻或因小肠梗阻再次入院的病例。住院时间中位数为 2 天(IQR 1-3)。从2020年到2021年,73%的患者在POD1出院,89%在POD2出院。共发生 31 例并发症,其中 4% 为 III-IV 级。在初级治疗中,精原细胞瘤和NSGCT的2年RFS分别为0.93(95% CI 0.84-1.00)和0.85(95% CI 0.72-1.00)。在 PC 环境中,精原细胞瘤和 NSGCT 的 2 年 RFS 分别为 0.88(95% CI 0.74-1.00)和 0.88(95% CI 0.81-0.95)。结论中线 EP-RPLND 是安全的,胃肠道恢复快,住院时间短,并发症发生率低。此外,它在初治和化疗后的肿瘤治疗效果也是可以接受的,场内复发率较低。
11-Year Experience With Midline Extraperitoneal Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Germ Cell Tumors.
PURPOSE
A midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution.
METHODS
All patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 to 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, peri-operative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included recurrence free survival (2-year RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology.
RESULTS
Overall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6) months. Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 (1.8-5.4)cm, of which 16 cases were > 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2(IQR 1-3) days. From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on POD1 and 89% by POD2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III-IV. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00); respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95); respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Midline EP-RPLND is safe, associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.