Jacob Simmonds,Steven D Zangwill,Bethany Wisotzkey,Ryan Cantor,Hong Zhao,James K Kirklin,Dipankar Gupta
{"title":"小儿心脏移植术后早期机械循环支持--来自小儿心脏移植协会的分析。","authors":"Jacob Simmonds,Steven D Zangwill,Bethany Wisotzkey,Ryan Cantor,Hong Zhao,James K Kirklin,Dipankar Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe use of early Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) following pediatric heart transplantation is not well-published. This paper attempts to uncover the incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of MCS in a large, international cohort.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database (an international, prospective, event-driven database) was retrospectively analyzed for all cases of primary heart transplant over an 11-year period (2010-2020), dividing the cohort based on need for MCS within 30 days of transplantation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 4321 primary transplants, 249 (5.8%) required MCS (230 ECMO, 19 VAD). In a Cox proportional hazard model, congenital heart disease (p = 0.0002), older donor age (p < 0.0001), and longer ischemic time (p = 0.018) were each related to an increased need for MCS; increasing recipient body surface area (p < 0.0001) and increasing donor left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016) were both correlated with less MCS use. 1-year survival in those requiring MCS was 54.2%, compared with 94.8% in those who did not need MCS (p < 0.0001). Later survival in patients surviving to one year was similar between the groups.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMCS is used infrequently following pediatric heart transplant, and is related to donor, recipient and transplant factors. Although mortality is high, those surviving the first year post-transplant have excellent outcomes. Judicious use in those patients who would otherwise perish is therefore justified.","PeriodicalId":22654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Circulatory Support Early After Pediatric Heart Transplantation - an analysis from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Simmonds,Steven D Zangwill,Bethany Wisotzkey,Ryan Cantor,Hong Zhao,James K Kirklin,Dipankar Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe use of early Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) following pediatric heart transplantation is not well-published. This paper attempts to uncover the incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of MCS in a large, international cohort.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database (an international, prospective, event-driven database) was retrospectively analyzed for all cases of primary heart transplant over an 11-year period (2010-2020), dividing the cohort based on need for MCS within 30 days of transplantation.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 4321 primary transplants, 249 (5.8%) required MCS (230 ECMO, 19 VAD). In a Cox proportional hazard model, congenital heart disease (p = 0.0002), older donor age (p < 0.0001), and longer ischemic time (p = 0.018) were each related to an increased need for MCS; increasing recipient body surface area (p < 0.0001) and increasing donor left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016) were both correlated with less MCS use. 1-year survival in those requiring MCS was 54.2%, compared with 94.8% in those who did not need MCS (p < 0.0001). Later survival in patients surviving to one year was similar between the groups.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nMCS is used infrequently following pediatric heart transplant, and is related to donor, recipient and transplant factors. Although mortality is high, those surviving the first year post-transplant have excellent outcomes. Judicious use in those patients who would otherwise perish is therefore justified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mechanical Circulatory Support Early After Pediatric Heart Transplantation - an analysis from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society.
BACKGROUND
The use of early Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) following pediatric heart transplantation is not well-published. This paper attempts to uncover the incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of MCS in a large, international cohort.
METHODS
The Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database (an international, prospective, event-driven database) was retrospectively analyzed for all cases of primary heart transplant over an 11-year period (2010-2020), dividing the cohort based on need for MCS within 30 days of transplantation.
RESULTS
Of 4321 primary transplants, 249 (5.8%) required MCS (230 ECMO, 19 VAD). In a Cox proportional hazard model, congenital heart disease (p = 0.0002), older donor age (p < 0.0001), and longer ischemic time (p = 0.018) were each related to an increased need for MCS; increasing recipient body surface area (p < 0.0001) and increasing donor left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016) were both correlated with less MCS use. 1-year survival in those requiring MCS was 54.2%, compared with 94.8% in those who did not need MCS (p < 0.0001). Later survival in patients surviving to one year was similar between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
MCS is used infrequently following pediatric heart transplant, and is related to donor, recipient and transplant factors. Although mortality is high, those surviving the first year post-transplant have excellent outcomes. Judicious use in those patients who would otherwise perish is therefore justified.