预测儿科医院员工受伤的风险

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emrah Gecili, Nancy Daraiseh, Cole Brokamp, Maurizio Macaluso
{"title":"预测儿科医院员工受伤的风险","authors":"Emrah Gecili,&nbsp;Nancy Daraiseh,&nbsp;Cole Brokamp,&nbsp;Maurizio Macaluso","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><strong>PURPOSE</strong></h3><p>Healthcare has one of the highest rates of non-fatal occupational injury as compared to other industries. Yet, evaluation of risk determinants and prediction algorithms in hospital settings remains limited.</p></div><div><h3><strong>METHODS</strong></h3><p>This study examines risk factors for employee injuries in a large pediatric hospital and evaluates prediction algorithms using hospital surveillance data, incident reports, and work unit measures such as patient density and employee workload. We employed multiple statistical models and machine learning tools, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), penalized logistic regression (PLR), Naïve Bayes, neural network (NN), XGBoost (XG), and mixed-effects logistic regression (GLMER) to predict employee injury risk for specific time periods. We used cross-validation and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to assess model performance.</p></div><div><h3><strong>RESULTS</strong></h3><p>GLMER, LR, and PLR were superior to other models, with higher AUC values (∼0.76), indicating good discrimination ability, though accuracy and specificity varied across models. RF showed high accuracy and specificity and comparable AUC with the top performing models. Further analyses using GLMER revealed variability in employee injury risk across months, days, and hospital units, identifying peaks on Tuesdays and Saturdays and in April and July, with lows in March and June.</p></div><div><h3><strong>CONCLUSION</strong></h3><p>Our findings highlight the significance of monitoring specific risk factors within pediatric hospital settings and pairing them with appropriate predictive algorithms to effectively predict and mitigate employee injuries. These insights indicate that continuous monitoring may help enhance employee safety. Future work should evaluate additional predictors that may be obtained from individual hospital units, which may inform targeted prevention strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"97 ","pages":"Page 107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PREDICTING RISK OF EMPLOYEE INJURY IN A PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL\",\"authors\":\"Emrah Gecili,&nbsp;Nancy Daraiseh,&nbsp;Cole Brokamp,&nbsp;Maurizio Macaluso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.06.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3><strong>PURPOSE</strong></h3><p>Healthcare has one of the highest rates of non-fatal occupational injury as compared to other industries. Yet, evaluation of risk determinants and prediction algorithms in hospital settings remains limited.</p></div><div><h3><strong>METHODS</strong></h3><p>This study examines risk factors for employee injuries in a large pediatric hospital and evaluates prediction algorithms using hospital surveillance data, incident reports, and work unit measures such as patient density and employee workload. We employed multiple statistical models and machine learning tools, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), penalized logistic regression (PLR), Naïve Bayes, neural network (NN), XGBoost (XG), and mixed-effects logistic regression (GLMER) to predict employee injury risk for specific time periods. We used cross-validation and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to assess model performance.</p></div><div><h3><strong>RESULTS</strong></h3><p>GLMER, LR, and PLR were superior to other models, with higher AUC values (∼0.76), indicating good discrimination ability, though accuracy and specificity varied across models. RF showed high accuracy and specificity and comparable AUC with the top performing models. Further analyses using GLMER revealed variability in employee injury risk across months, days, and hospital units, identifying peaks on Tuesdays and Saturdays and in April and July, with lows in March and June.</p></div><div><h3><strong>CONCLUSION</strong></h3><p>Our findings highlight the significance of monitoring specific risk factors within pediatric hospital settings and pairing them with appropriate predictive algorithms to effectively predict and mitigate employee injuries. These insights indicate that continuous monitoring may help enhance employee safety. Future work should evaluate additional predictors that may be obtained from individual hospital units, which may inform targeted prevention strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Page 107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279724001157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279724001157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的与其他行业相比,医疗行业是非致命性工伤发生率最高的行业之一。本研究探讨了一家大型儿科医院中员工受伤的风险因素,并使用医院监控数据、事故报告和工作单位指标(如患者密度和员工工作量)对预测算法进行了评估。我们采用了多种统计模型和机器学习工具,包括逻辑回归 (LR)、随机森林 (RF)、惩罚逻辑回归 (PLR)、奈夫贝叶斯、神经网络 (NN)、XGBoost (XG) 和混合效应逻辑回归 (GLMER),来预测特定时间段的员工伤害风险。结果GLMER、LR 和 PLR 优于其他模型,具有较高的 AUC 值(∼0.76),表明具有良好的区分能力,但不同模型的准确性和特异性各不相同。RF 显示出较高的准确性和特异性,其 AUC 值与表现最好的模型相当。使用 GLMER 进行的进一步分析表明,员工伤害风险在不同月份、不同天数和不同医院单位之间存在差异,周二和周六以及四月和七月为高峰,三月和六月为低谷。这些研究结果表明,持续监测有助于加强员工安全。未来的工作应评估可从个别医院单位获得的其他预测因素,从而为有针对性的预防策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PREDICTING RISK OF EMPLOYEE INJURY IN A PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL

PURPOSE

Healthcare has one of the highest rates of non-fatal occupational injury as compared to other industries. Yet, evaluation of risk determinants and prediction algorithms in hospital settings remains limited.

METHODS

This study examines risk factors for employee injuries in a large pediatric hospital and evaluates prediction algorithms using hospital surveillance data, incident reports, and work unit measures such as patient density and employee workload. We employed multiple statistical models and machine learning tools, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), penalized logistic regression (PLR), Naïve Bayes, neural network (NN), XGBoost (XG), and mixed-effects logistic regression (GLMER) to predict employee injury risk for specific time periods. We used cross-validation and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to assess model performance.

RESULTS

GLMER, LR, and PLR were superior to other models, with higher AUC values (∼0.76), indicating good discrimination ability, though accuracy and specificity varied across models. RF showed high accuracy and specificity and comparable AUC with the top performing models. Further analyses using GLMER revealed variability in employee injury risk across months, days, and hospital units, identifying peaks on Tuesdays and Saturdays and in April and July, with lows in March and June.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the significance of monitoring specific risk factors within pediatric hospital settings and pairing them with appropriate predictive algorithms to effectively predict and mitigate employee injuries. These insights indicate that continuous monitoring may help enhance employee safety. Future work should evaluate additional predictors that may be obtained from individual hospital units, which may inform targeted prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信