实现可持续建筑:作为新型胶凝补充材料的 Dillenia suffruticosa 和 Acacia auriculiformis 灰树叶的强度和微观结构评估

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"实现可持续建筑:作为新型胶凝补充材料的 Dillenia suffruticosa 和 Acacia auriculiformis 灰树叶的强度和微观结构评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers are exploring local, recycled, and waste materials for construction to address environmental concerns. Concrete heavily depends on cement, contributing to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Substituting cement with alternatives like recycled materials can cut energy use and minimize the environmental impact on concrete production. This research represents the first investigation into using Dillenia Suffruticosa (DS) and Acacia Auriculiformis (AA) leaf ash as sustainable alternatives to cement in producing eco-friendly mortar, an area that other researchers have not previously explored. The study aims to investigate using DS and AA leaf ash as sustainable alternatives to cement in mortar production. In this study, the incorporation of DS and AA leaf ash as a partial replacement for cement was systematically varied in increments of 5 %, ranging from 5 % to 40 % of the total mortar volume. The ash was systematically incorporated into the mortar in increments of 5 %, ranging from 5 % to 40 % of the total mortar volume. The study further conducted a comprehensive investigation into the physical properties of the mortar, including consistency, bulk density, dry density, water absorption, and flow characteristics, alongside an analysis of its compressive strength. Microstructural behaviour was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis to provide a comprehensive analysis. Results indicate that the enhancement in compressive strength of DS ash specimens, relative to AA ash, ranged from 1.32 % to 24.49 % at 7 days, 5.81 %–16.86 % at 14 days, and 1.87 %–11.91 % at 28 days. Furthermore, the highest enhancement in compressive strength is observed with a composition containing 10 % DS ash and 5 % AA ash content, underscoring the superior performance of DS ash compared to AA ash. The mineralogical characteristics of DS and AA leaf ashes illustrate their effectiveness as supplementary cementitious materials in sustainable construction. The significant advantages of using DS and AA leaf ash as a cement substitute are environmental sustainability, innovative materials use, and contribution to sustainable construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards sustainable construction: Strength and microstructural assessment of Dillenia suffruticosa and Acacia auriculiformis leaf ash as novel supplementary cementitious materials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Researchers are exploring local, recycled, and waste materials for construction to address environmental concerns. Concrete heavily depends on cement, contributing to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Substituting cement with alternatives like recycled materials can cut energy use and minimize the environmental impact on concrete production. This research represents the first investigation into using Dillenia Suffruticosa (DS) and Acacia Auriculiformis (AA) leaf ash as sustainable alternatives to cement in producing eco-friendly mortar, an area that other researchers have not previously explored. The study aims to investigate using DS and AA leaf ash as sustainable alternatives to cement in mortar production. In this study, the incorporation of DS and AA leaf ash as a partial replacement for cement was systematically varied in increments of 5 %, ranging from 5 % to 40 % of the total mortar volume. The ash was systematically incorporated into the mortar in increments of 5 %, ranging from 5 % to 40 % of the total mortar volume. The study further conducted a comprehensive investigation into the physical properties of the mortar, including consistency, bulk density, dry density, water absorption, and flow characteristics, alongside an analysis of its compressive strength. Microstructural behaviour was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis to provide a comprehensive analysis. Results indicate that the enhancement in compressive strength of DS ash specimens, relative to AA ash, ranged from 1.32 % to 24.49 % at 7 days, 5.81 %–16.86 % at 14 days, and 1.87 %–11.91 % at 28 days. Furthermore, the highest enhancement in compressive strength is observed with a composition containing 10 % DS ash and 5 % AA ash content, underscoring the superior performance of DS ash compared to AA ash. The mineralogical characteristics of DS and AA leaf ashes illustrate their effectiveness as supplementary cementitious materials in sustainable construction. The significant advantages of using DS and AA leaf ash as a cement substitute are environmental sustainability, innovative materials use, and contribution to sustainable construction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224022952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224022952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员正在探索用于建筑的本地、回收和废弃材料,以解决环境问题。混凝土在很大程度上依赖水泥,从而导致能源消耗和温室气体排放。用再生材料等替代品代替水泥,可以减少能源消耗,最大限度地降低混凝土生产对环境的影响。本研究首次调查了使用 Dillenia Suffruticosa(DS)和 Acacia Auriculiformis(AA)叶灰作为水泥的可持续替代品来生产环保砂浆的情况,这是其他研究人员以前未曾探索过的领域。本研究旨在调查在砂浆生产中使用 DS 和 AA 灰树叶作为水泥的可持续替代品的情况。在这项研究中,作为水泥的部分替代品,DS 和 AA 树叶灰的掺入量以 5 % 为增量进行系统变化,占砂浆总量的 5 % 到 40 % 不等。灰烬被系统地掺入灰泥中,掺量从占灰泥总量的 5% 到 40% 不等,每增加 5%。研究进一步对灰泥的物理性质进行了全面调查,包括稠度、体积密度、干密度、吸水性和流动特性,同时还对其抗压强度进行了分析。通过扫描电子显微镜、X 射线衍射、傅立叶变换红外光谱和热重分析对微观结构行为进行了评估,以提供全面的分析。结果表明,相对于 AA 灰,DS 灰试样的抗压强度在 7 天时提高了 1.32 % 至 24.49 %,在 14 天时提高了 5.81 % 至 16.86 %,在 28 天时提高了 1.87 % 至 11.91 %。此外,在含有 10 % DS 灰分和 5 % AA 灰分的成分中,抗压强度的提高幅度最大,这表明 DS 灰分的性能优于 AA 灰分。DS 灰烬和 AA 灰烬的矿物学特征说明了它们在可持续建筑中作为辅助胶凝材料的有效性。使用 DS 灰和 AA 灰作为水泥替代品的显著优势在于环境可持续性、材料使用的创新性以及对可持续建筑的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards sustainable construction: Strength and microstructural assessment of Dillenia suffruticosa and Acacia auriculiformis leaf ash as novel supplementary cementitious materials

Towards sustainable construction: Strength and microstructural assessment of Dillenia suffruticosa and Acacia auriculiformis leaf ash as novel supplementary cementitious materials

Researchers are exploring local, recycled, and waste materials for construction to address environmental concerns. Concrete heavily depends on cement, contributing to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Substituting cement with alternatives like recycled materials can cut energy use and minimize the environmental impact on concrete production. This research represents the first investigation into using Dillenia Suffruticosa (DS) and Acacia Auriculiformis (AA) leaf ash as sustainable alternatives to cement in producing eco-friendly mortar, an area that other researchers have not previously explored. The study aims to investigate using DS and AA leaf ash as sustainable alternatives to cement in mortar production. In this study, the incorporation of DS and AA leaf ash as a partial replacement for cement was systematically varied in increments of 5 %, ranging from 5 % to 40 % of the total mortar volume. The ash was systematically incorporated into the mortar in increments of 5 %, ranging from 5 % to 40 % of the total mortar volume. The study further conducted a comprehensive investigation into the physical properties of the mortar, including consistency, bulk density, dry density, water absorption, and flow characteristics, alongside an analysis of its compressive strength. Microstructural behaviour was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis to provide a comprehensive analysis. Results indicate that the enhancement in compressive strength of DS ash specimens, relative to AA ash, ranged from 1.32 % to 24.49 % at 7 days, 5.81 %–16.86 % at 14 days, and 1.87 %–11.91 % at 28 days. Furthermore, the highest enhancement in compressive strength is observed with a composition containing 10 % DS ash and 5 % AA ash content, underscoring the superior performance of DS ash compared to AA ash. The mineralogical characteristics of DS and AA leaf ashes illustrate their effectiveness as supplementary cementitious materials in sustainable construction. The significant advantages of using DS and AA leaf ash as a cement substitute are environmental sustainability, innovative materials use, and contribution to sustainable construction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信