Tiago V. Pereira , Pakeezah Saadat , Pavlos Bobos , Samir M. Iskander , Nicolas S. Bodmer , Martina Rudnicki , Henry Dan Kiyomoto , Thais Montezuma , Matheus O. Almeida , Rishi Bansal , Pai-Shan Cheng , Jason W. Busse , Alex J. Sutton , Peter Tugwell , Gillian A. Hawker , Peter Jüni , Bruno R. da Costa
{"title":"基于大型随机试验的膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎关节内干预措施的有效性和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Tiago V. Pereira , Pakeezah Saadat , Pavlos Bobos , Samir M. Iskander , Nicolas S. Bodmer , Martina Rudnicki , Henry Dan Kiyomoto , Thais Montezuma , Matheus O. Almeida , Rishi Bansal , Pai-Shan Cheng , Jason W. Busse , Alex J. Sutton , Peter Tugwell , Gillian A. Hawker , Peter Jüni , Bruno R. da Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To quantify the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) through a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We searched CENTRAL and regulatory agency websites (inception-2023) for large, English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (≥100 patients/group) examining any intra-articular intervention. Primary outcome: pain intensity. Secondary outcomes: physical function and safety outcomes. Pain and function outcomes were analyzed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-randomization, and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) (95% credible intervals, 95% CrI). The prespecified minimal clinically important between-group difference (MID) was −0.37 SMD. Safety outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) (95% CrI).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Among 57 RCTs (22,795 participants) examining 18 intra-articular interventions, usual care or placebo, treatment effects were larger in 35 high-risk–of-bias trials than in 22 low/unclear-risk-of-bias trials. In the main analysis (excluding high-risk-of-bias trials), triamcinolone had the highest probabilities of reaching the MID at weeks 2 and 6 (75.3% and 90%, respectively) with corresponding SMDs of −0.48 (95% CrI,−0.85 to −0.10) and −0.53 (95% CrI,−0.79 to −0.27) compared to placebo (1 trial). The complex homeopathic products Tr14/Ze14 showed therapeutic potential at week 6 compared to placebo (SMD:−0.42, 95% CrI,−0.71 to −0.11, 63.5% probability of reaching the MID, 1 trial). Hyaluronic acid had no effect on pain (SMD:-0.04, 95% CrI,−0.19 to 0.11, 11 trials) but a higher risk of dropouts due to adverse events (OR: 2.01, 95% CrI,1.08 to 3.77) and serious adverse events (OR: 1.86, 95% CrI, 1.16 to 3.03) than placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Triamcinolone had the highest probabilities to have a treatment effect beyond the MID at weeks 2–6. Large RCTs with lower risk of bias indicate that the effects of 16 intra-articular interventions in knee or hip OA were smaller than the MID, and that most were consistent with placebo effects. Lack of evidence of long-term effectiveness underscores the need for further research beyond 24 weeks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 207-217"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis based on large randomized trials: A systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tiago V. Pereira , Pakeezah Saadat , Pavlos Bobos , Samir M. Iskander , Nicolas S. Bodmer , Martina Rudnicki , Henry Dan Kiyomoto , Thais Montezuma , Matheus O. Almeida , Rishi Bansal , Pai-Shan Cheng , Jason W. Busse , Alex J. Sutton , Peter Tugwell , Gillian A. Hawker , Peter Jüni , Bruno R. da Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To quantify the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) through a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We searched CENTRAL and regulatory agency websites (inception-2023) for large, English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (≥100 patients/group) examining any intra-articular intervention. Primary outcome: pain intensity. Secondary outcomes: physical function and safety outcomes. Pain and function outcomes were analyzed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-randomization, and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) (95% credible intervals, 95% CrI). The prespecified minimal clinically important between-group difference (MID) was −0.37 SMD. Safety outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) (95% CrI).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Among 57 RCTs (22,795 participants) examining 18 intra-articular interventions, usual care or placebo, treatment effects were larger in 35 high-risk–of-bias trials than in 22 low/unclear-risk-of-bias trials. In the main analysis (excluding high-risk-of-bias trials), triamcinolone had the highest probabilities of reaching the MID at weeks 2 and 6 (75.3% and 90%, respectively) with corresponding SMDs of −0.48 (95% CrI,−0.85 to −0.10) and −0.53 (95% CrI,−0.79 to −0.27) compared to placebo (1 trial). The complex homeopathic products Tr14/Ze14 showed therapeutic potential at week 6 compared to placebo (SMD:−0.42, 95% CrI,−0.71 to −0.11, 63.5% probability of reaching the MID, 1 trial). Hyaluronic acid had no effect on pain (SMD:-0.04, 95% CrI,−0.19 to 0.11, 11 trials) but a higher risk of dropouts due to adverse events (OR: 2.01, 95% CrI,1.08 to 3.77) and serious adverse events (OR: 1.86, 95% CrI, 1.16 to 3.03) than placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Triamcinolone had the highest probabilities to have a treatment effect beyond the MID at weeks 2–6. Large RCTs with lower risk of bias indicate that the effects of 16 intra-articular interventions in knee or hip OA were smaller than the MID, and that most were consistent with placebo effects. Lack of evidence of long-term effectiveness underscores the need for further research beyond 24 weeks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106345842401389X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106345842401389X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis based on large randomized trials: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Objective
To quantify the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) through a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.
Design
We searched CENTRAL and regulatory agency websites (inception-2023) for large, English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (≥100 patients/group) examining any intra-articular intervention. Primary outcome: pain intensity. Secondary outcomes: physical function and safety outcomes. Pain and function outcomes were analyzed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-randomization, and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) (95% credible intervals, 95% CrI). The prespecified minimal clinically important between-group difference (MID) was −0.37 SMD. Safety outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) (95% CrI).
Findings
Among 57 RCTs (22,795 participants) examining 18 intra-articular interventions, usual care or placebo, treatment effects were larger in 35 high-risk–of-bias trials than in 22 low/unclear-risk-of-bias trials. In the main analysis (excluding high-risk-of-bias trials), triamcinolone had the highest probabilities of reaching the MID at weeks 2 and 6 (75.3% and 90%, respectively) with corresponding SMDs of −0.48 (95% CrI,−0.85 to −0.10) and −0.53 (95% CrI,−0.79 to −0.27) compared to placebo (1 trial). The complex homeopathic products Tr14/Ze14 showed therapeutic potential at week 6 compared to placebo (SMD:−0.42, 95% CrI,−0.71 to −0.11, 63.5% probability of reaching the MID, 1 trial). Hyaluronic acid had no effect on pain (SMD:-0.04, 95% CrI,−0.19 to 0.11, 11 trials) but a higher risk of dropouts due to adverse events (OR: 2.01, 95% CrI,1.08 to 3.77) and serious adverse events (OR: 1.86, 95% CrI, 1.16 to 3.03) than placebo.
Conclusion
Triamcinolone had the highest probabilities to have a treatment effect beyond the MID at weeks 2–6. Large RCTs with lower risk of bias indicate that the effects of 16 intra-articular interventions in knee or hip OA were smaller than the MID, and that most were consistent with placebo effects. Lack of evidence of long-term effectiveness underscores the need for further research beyond 24 weeks.
期刊介绍:
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.