关于胜率的不稳定性

Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.spl.2024.110267
David Oakes
{"title":"关于胜率的不稳定性","authors":"David Oakes","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The win-ratio analysis of controlled clinical trials uses pairwise comparisons between patients in the treatment and control group based on a primary outcome, say time to death, with indeterminacies resolved where possible by a secondary outcome, say time to hospitalization. The resulting preferences may not be transitive. Intransitivity occurs when potential follow-up times vary between patients and rankings from the primary events differ from those from secondary events. We characterize the structure of closed loops, derive some general properties of win-ratio preferences and provide simple numerical illustrations. Under realistic assumptions, unless all potential follow-up times are equal, intransitivities are certain to occur in sufficiently large samples, but their overall frequency is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002360/pdfft?md5=fd0a2637e1a6a5c617f98f7212ce4ef9&pid=1-s2.0-S0167715224002360-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the intransitivity of the win ratio\",\"authors\":\"David Oakes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The win-ratio analysis of controlled clinical trials uses pairwise comparisons between patients in the treatment and control group based on a primary outcome, say time to death, with indeterminacies resolved where possible by a secondary outcome, say time to hospitalization. The resulting preferences may not be transitive. Intransitivity occurs when potential follow-up times vary between patients and rankings from the primary events differ from those from secondary events. We characterize the structure of closed loops, derive some general properties of win-ratio preferences and provide simple numerical illustrations. Under realistic assumptions, unless all potential follow-up times are equal, intransitivities are certain to occur in sufficiently large samples, but their overall frequency is low.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002360/pdfft?md5=fd0a2637e1a6a5c617f98f7212ce4ef9&pid=1-s2.0-S0167715224002360-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对照临床试验的胜率分析是根据主要结果(如死亡时间)对治疗组和对照组的患者进行配对比较,并尽可能通过次要结果(如住院时间)来解决不确定性。由此得出的优选结果可能不具有传递性。当不同患者的潜在随访时间不同,主要事件的排名与次要事件的排名不同时,就会出现不传递性。我们描述了闭合环路的结构,推导出赢率偏好的一些一般属性,并提供了简单的数字说明。在现实的假设条件下,除非所有潜在的随访时间都相同,否则在足够大的样本中一定会出现非短暂性,但其总体频率很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
On the intransitivity of the win ratio

The win-ratio analysis of controlled clinical trials uses pairwise comparisons between patients in the treatment and control group based on a primary outcome, say time to death, with indeterminacies resolved where possible by a secondary outcome, say time to hospitalization. The resulting preferences may not be transitive. Intransitivity occurs when potential follow-up times vary between patients and rankings from the primary events differ from those from secondary events. We characterize the structure of closed loops, derive some general properties of win-ratio preferences and provide simple numerical illustrations. Under realistic assumptions, unless all potential follow-up times are equal, intransitivities are certain to occur in sufficiently large samples, but their overall frequency is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信