非常规油田多井轨迹优化的混合机器学习框架

0 ENERGY & FUELS
D. Davudov , U. Odi , A. Gupta , G. Singh , B. Dindoruk , A. Venkatraman , K. Osei
{"title":"非常规油田多井轨迹优化的混合机器学习框架","authors":"D. Davudov ,&nbsp;U. Odi ,&nbsp;A. Gupta ,&nbsp;G. Singh ,&nbsp;B. Dindoruk ,&nbsp;A. Venkatraman ,&nbsp;K. Osei","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The well placement problem in the petroleum industry is usually solved by integrating an optimizer with a reservoir simulation model. This is a time-consuming approach requiring thousands of simulation runs depending on the complexity of the reservoir system. This paper introduces two well placement optimization models: a Fast-Marching Model (FMM) based on fluid flow physics and a Hybrid Model integrating reservoir simulations and FMM results with a gradient boosting algorithm. These models prioritize speed and accuracy when integrated with genetic algorithm optimization, demonstrated using a synthetic unconventional field. From 290 randomly selected locations across the synthetic unconventional field, simulation runs were performed to determine cumulative gas production and used as ground truth. Using reservoir properties at these locations as inputs, Relative Opportunity Ranking (ROR) maps were generated using the FMM and Hybrid Model approaches. The ROR maps were then linked with a genetic algorithm to determine optimal well locations, iteratively updating ROR maps with penalty maps until all wells were appropriately placed. Results indicated that the standalone FMM generated ROR maps were highly correlated with the simulation results. Time complexity analysis revealed that both models were significantly faster than traditional methods, with the FMM independent of simulation and the Hybrid Model requiring only about 290 simulation runs. Ultimately, these models have shown tremendous potential for integration into current reservoir engineering workflows, reducing decision-making times in both greenfield and brownfield scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 205443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid machine learning framework for multi-well trajectory optimization in an unconventional field\",\"authors\":\"D. Davudov ,&nbsp;U. Odi ,&nbsp;A. Gupta ,&nbsp;G. Singh ,&nbsp;B. Dindoruk ,&nbsp;A. Venkatraman ,&nbsp;K. Osei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The well placement problem in the petroleum industry is usually solved by integrating an optimizer with a reservoir simulation model. This is a time-consuming approach requiring thousands of simulation runs depending on the complexity of the reservoir system. This paper introduces two well placement optimization models: a Fast-Marching Model (FMM) based on fluid flow physics and a Hybrid Model integrating reservoir simulations and FMM results with a gradient boosting algorithm. These models prioritize speed and accuracy when integrated with genetic algorithm optimization, demonstrated using a synthetic unconventional field. From 290 randomly selected locations across the synthetic unconventional field, simulation runs were performed to determine cumulative gas production and used as ground truth. Using reservoir properties at these locations as inputs, Relative Opportunity Ranking (ROR) maps were generated using the FMM and Hybrid Model approaches. The ROR maps were then linked with a genetic algorithm to determine optimal well locations, iteratively updating ROR maps with penalty maps until all wells were appropriately placed. Results indicated that the standalone FMM generated ROR maps were highly correlated with the simulation results. Time complexity analysis revealed that both models were significantly faster than traditional methods, with the FMM independent of simulation and the Hybrid Model requiring only about 290 simulation runs. Ultimately, these models have shown tremendous potential for integration into current reservoir engineering workflows, reducing decision-making times in both greenfield and brownfield scenarios.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 205443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908924002395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908924002395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

石油工业中的油井布置问题通常是通过将优化器与油藏模拟模型相结合来解决的。这是一种耗时的方法,根据储层系统的复杂程度,需要进行数千次模拟运行。本文介绍了两种井位优化模型:一种是基于流体流动物理学的快速进军模型(FMM),另一种是将储层模拟和 FMM 结果与梯度提升算法相结合的混合模型。这些模型在与遗传算法优化相结合时,优先考虑速度和精度,并使用一个合成非常规油田进行了演示。从合成非常规气田中随机选择的 290 个地点进行模拟运行,以确定累计天然气产量,并将其作为基本事实。将这些地点的储层属性作为输入,使用 FMM 和混合模型方法生成相对机会排序(ROR)图。然后将相对机会排序图与遗传算法联系起来,以确定最佳井位,用惩罚图反复更新相对机会排序图,直到所有井位都合适为止。结果表明,独立的 FMM 生成的 ROR 地图与模拟结果高度相关。时间复杂性分析表明,这两种模型都比传统方法快得多,FMM 与模拟无关,而混合模型只需要运行大约 290 次模拟。最终,这些模型显示出巨大的潜力,可以集成到当前的油藏工程工作流程中,缩短绿地和棕地方案的决策时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid machine learning framework for multi-well trajectory optimization in an unconventional field

The well placement problem in the petroleum industry is usually solved by integrating an optimizer with a reservoir simulation model. This is a time-consuming approach requiring thousands of simulation runs depending on the complexity of the reservoir system. This paper introduces two well placement optimization models: a Fast-Marching Model (FMM) based on fluid flow physics and a Hybrid Model integrating reservoir simulations and FMM results with a gradient boosting algorithm. These models prioritize speed and accuracy when integrated with genetic algorithm optimization, demonstrated using a synthetic unconventional field. From 290 randomly selected locations across the synthetic unconventional field, simulation runs were performed to determine cumulative gas production and used as ground truth. Using reservoir properties at these locations as inputs, Relative Opportunity Ranking (ROR) maps were generated using the FMM and Hybrid Model approaches. The ROR maps were then linked with a genetic algorithm to determine optimal well locations, iteratively updating ROR maps with penalty maps until all wells were appropriately placed. Results indicated that the standalone FMM generated ROR maps were highly correlated with the simulation results. Time complexity analysis revealed that both models were significantly faster than traditional methods, with the FMM independent of simulation and the Hybrid Model requiring only about 290 simulation runs. Ultimately, these models have shown tremendous potential for integration into current reservoir engineering workflows, reducing decision-making times in both greenfield and brownfield scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信