Phillip Staibano , Michael Au , Michael Xie , Michael K. Gupta , James Edward Massey (Ted) Young , Han Zhang
{"title":"经口机器人手术治疗早期口咽鳞癌后的重返工作和自述吞咽情况:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Phillip Staibano , Michael Au , Michael Xie , Michael K. Gupta , James Edward Massey (Ted) Young , Han Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Treatment de-intensification, including transoral robotic surgery (TORS), may outcomes in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Early return to work (RTW) improves quality of life in oncology patients. Our objective was to compare the RTW time in OPSCC patients undergoing primary TORS or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We investigated the role of treatment modality on self-reported swallowing function.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients were adults diagnosed with early-stage (T1–2, N0–2) OPSCC and treated via primary TORS or CRT. We performed 1:1 exact case matching based on tumor stage and subsite. We collected RTW outcomes for all patients. We also reported MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) scores up to 24 months from the end of treatment. We performed statistical analyses and comparison of RTW and MDADI outcomes based on treatment group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 26 patients undergoing primary TORS and 25 undergoing primary CRT were included. We found a significant improvement in RTW in TORS patients compared to CRT (TORS: 54 days (1.8 months), IQR: 30.8; CRT: 164 days (5.4 months), IQR: 109; W=587, p = 9.28e-08) independent of HPV status, tonsillar subsite, and radiotherapy alone. Primary TORS had a 16.2-fold (95 % CI: 5.78–45.5) higher likelihood of returning to work than primary CRT patients. Primary TORS also had better MDADI scores within two years of treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In OPSCC, primary TORS accelerated RTW and improved swallowing when compared to primary CRT. The potential economic advantage of returning to work sooner should be discussed when reviewing treatment options with patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 107033"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to work and self-reported swallowing following transoral robotic surgery for early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Staibano , Michael Au , Michael Xie , Michael K. Gupta , James Edward Massey (Ted) Young , Han Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Treatment de-intensification, including transoral robotic surgery (TORS), may outcomes in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Early return to work (RTW) improves quality of life in oncology patients. Our objective was to compare the RTW time in OPSCC patients undergoing primary TORS or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We investigated the role of treatment modality on self-reported swallowing function.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients were adults diagnosed with early-stage (T1–2, N0–2) OPSCC and treated via primary TORS or CRT. We performed 1:1 exact case matching based on tumor stage and subsite. We collected RTW outcomes for all patients. We also reported MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) scores up to 24 months from the end of treatment. We performed statistical analyses and comparison of RTW and MDADI outcomes based on treatment group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 26 patients undergoing primary TORS and 25 undergoing primary CRT were included. We found a significant improvement in RTW in TORS patients compared to CRT (TORS: 54 days (1.8 months), IQR: 30.8; CRT: 164 days (5.4 months), IQR: 109; W=587, p = 9.28e-08) independent of HPV status, tonsillar subsite, and radiotherapy alone. Primary TORS had a 16.2-fold (95 % CI: 5.78–45.5) higher likelihood of returning to work than primary CRT patients. Primary TORS also had better MDADI scores within two years of treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In OPSCC, primary TORS accelerated RTW and improved swallowing when compared to primary CRT. The potential economic advantage of returning to work sooner should be discussed when reviewing treatment options with patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524003518\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524003518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Return to work and self-reported swallowing following transoral robotic surgery for early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study
Background
Treatment de-intensification, including transoral robotic surgery (TORS), may outcomes in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Early return to work (RTW) improves quality of life in oncology patients. Our objective was to compare the RTW time in OPSCC patients undergoing primary TORS or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We investigated the role of treatment modality on self-reported swallowing function.
Methods
All patients were adults diagnosed with early-stage (T1–2, N0–2) OPSCC and treated via primary TORS or CRT. We performed 1:1 exact case matching based on tumor stage and subsite. We collected RTW outcomes for all patients. We also reported MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) scores up to 24 months from the end of treatment. We performed statistical analyses and comparison of RTW and MDADI outcomes based on treatment group.
Results
Overall, 26 patients undergoing primary TORS and 25 undergoing primary CRT were included. We found a significant improvement in RTW in TORS patients compared to CRT (TORS: 54 days (1.8 months), IQR: 30.8; CRT: 164 days (5.4 months), IQR: 109; W=587, p = 9.28e-08) independent of HPV status, tonsillar subsite, and radiotherapy alone. Primary TORS had a 16.2-fold (95 % CI: 5.78–45.5) higher likelihood of returning to work than primary CRT patients. Primary TORS also had better MDADI scores within two years of treatment.
Conclusions
In OPSCC, primary TORS accelerated RTW and improved swallowing when compared to primary CRT. The potential economic advantage of returning to work sooner should be discussed when reviewing treatment options with patients.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.