科索地热田的地震区划以及流体生产和迁移引起的应力变化

IF 4.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sui Tung , Ole Kaven , Manoochehr Shirzaei , Timothy Masterlark , Herbert F. Wang , Wei-Chuang Huang , Kurt L. Feigl
{"title":"科索地热田的地震区划以及流体生产和迁移引起的应力变化","authors":"Sui Tung ,&nbsp;Ole Kaven ,&nbsp;Manoochehr Shirzaei ,&nbsp;Timothy Masterlark ,&nbsp;Herbert F. Wang ,&nbsp;Wei-Chuang Huang ,&nbsp;Kurt L. Feigl","doi":"10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Coso geothermal field is a major geothermal power production site in the western United States. It has been observed that low-magnitude seismic events (<em>M</em> &lt; 3.71) are unevenly distributed in three distinct zones, namely, nearfield (&lt;3 km), midfield (3–6 km), and farfield (&gt; 6 km) from the Coso geothermal plant. These zones exhibit distinct changes in earthquake location before and during geothermal production episodes that began in 1986. After 1986, the midfield region of the main flank experiences a significantly lower seismicity rate than the surrounding areas before production episodes. During 2014–2019, the farfield earthquakes cluster in the eastern and western parts of the greater Coso area, which is discernably different from how those pre-production earthquake events were distributed along the conjugate NW-SE and SW-NW trending structures across the main flank. Here, we analyze the stage of stress with finite-element-based poroelastic simulations to illustrate how the spatiotemporal evolution of the seismicity is associated with the pattern of stress perturbations caused by fluid migration amid the operations of geothermal power plants. Generally, ∼70% of co-production seismicity is found in zones of increased Coulomb stress between 2014 and 2019 at &gt;99% confidence. Meanwhile, the midfield zone of seismic paucity overlaps with the zone of decreasing pore-fluid pressure. Overall, the results provide a physical explanation of how decadal geothermal operations at Coso have perturbed stress-field changes and contributed to the evolving characteristic seismic pattern, shedding insights into assessing the seismic hazard in other geothermal settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11481,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","volume":"646 ","pages":"Article 119000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24004321/pdfft?md5=9249c7e8f73f85497da6c32169a41d52&pid=1-s2.0-S0012821X24004321-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismicity zoning at Coso geothermal field and stress changes from fluid production and migration\",\"authors\":\"Sui Tung ,&nbsp;Ole Kaven ,&nbsp;Manoochehr Shirzaei ,&nbsp;Timothy Masterlark ,&nbsp;Herbert F. Wang ,&nbsp;Wei-Chuang Huang ,&nbsp;Kurt L. Feigl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Coso geothermal field is a major geothermal power production site in the western United States. It has been observed that low-magnitude seismic events (<em>M</em> &lt; 3.71) are unevenly distributed in three distinct zones, namely, nearfield (&lt;3 km), midfield (3–6 km), and farfield (&gt; 6 km) from the Coso geothermal plant. These zones exhibit distinct changes in earthquake location before and during geothermal production episodes that began in 1986. After 1986, the midfield region of the main flank experiences a significantly lower seismicity rate than the surrounding areas before production episodes. During 2014–2019, the farfield earthquakes cluster in the eastern and western parts of the greater Coso area, which is discernably different from how those pre-production earthquake events were distributed along the conjugate NW-SE and SW-NW trending structures across the main flank. Here, we analyze the stage of stress with finite-element-based poroelastic simulations to illustrate how the spatiotemporal evolution of the seismicity is associated with the pattern of stress perturbations caused by fluid migration amid the operations of geothermal power plants. Generally, ∼70% of co-production seismicity is found in zones of increased Coulomb stress between 2014 and 2019 at &gt;99% confidence. Meanwhile, the midfield zone of seismic paucity overlaps with the zone of decreasing pore-fluid pressure. Overall, the results provide a physical explanation of how decadal geothermal operations at Coso have perturbed stress-field changes and contributed to the evolving characteristic seismic pattern, shedding insights into assessing the seismic hazard in other geothermal settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth and Planetary Science Letters\",\"volume\":\"646 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24004321/pdfft?md5=9249c7e8f73f85497da6c32169a41d52&pid=1-s2.0-S0012821X24004321-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth and Planetary Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24004321\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24004321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科索地热田是美国西部的一个主要地热发电站。据观察,低震级地震事件(M <3.71)不均匀地分布在三个不同的区域,即距离科索地热发电厂的近场(<3 千米)、中场(3-6 千米)和远场(>6 千米)。在 1986 年开始的地热生产活动之前和期间,这些区域的地震位置发生了明显变化。1986 年之后,主侧翼中场地区的地震率明显低于生产事件之前的周边地区。在 2014-2019 年期间,远场地震集中在大科索地区的东部和西部,这与生产前地震事件沿主翼 NW-SE 和 SW-NW 共轭结构的分布明显不同。在此,我们通过基于有限元的孔弹性模拟分析了应力阶段,以说明地震的时空演变如何与地热发电厂运行过程中流体迁移引起的应力扰动模式相关联。一般来说,在置信度为 99% 的情况下,2014 年至 2019 年期间,70% 的共产地震发生在库仑应力增加区。同时,中场地震贫乏区与孔隙流体压力下降区重叠。总之,研究结果提供了一个物理解释,说明了科索地热的十年运行如何扰动了应力场的变化,并促成了特征地震模式的演变,为评估其他地热环境中的地震危害提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismicity zoning at Coso geothermal field and stress changes from fluid production and migration

The Coso geothermal field is a major geothermal power production site in the western United States. It has been observed that low-magnitude seismic events (M < 3.71) are unevenly distributed in three distinct zones, namely, nearfield (<3 km), midfield (3–6 km), and farfield (> 6 km) from the Coso geothermal plant. These zones exhibit distinct changes in earthquake location before and during geothermal production episodes that began in 1986. After 1986, the midfield region of the main flank experiences a significantly lower seismicity rate than the surrounding areas before production episodes. During 2014–2019, the farfield earthquakes cluster in the eastern and western parts of the greater Coso area, which is discernably different from how those pre-production earthquake events were distributed along the conjugate NW-SE and SW-NW trending structures across the main flank. Here, we analyze the stage of stress with finite-element-based poroelastic simulations to illustrate how the spatiotemporal evolution of the seismicity is associated with the pattern of stress perturbations caused by fluid migration amid the operations of geothermal power plants. Generally, ∼70% of co-production seismicity is found in zones of increased Coulomb stress between 2014 and 2019 at >99% confidence. Meanwhile, the midfield zone of seismic paucity overlaps with the zone of decreasing pore-fluid pressure. Overall, the results provide a physical explanation of how decadal geothermal operations at Coso have perturbed stress-field changes and contributed to the evolving characteristic seismic pattern, shedding insights into assessing the seismic hazard in other geothermal settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
475
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) is a leading journal for researchers across the entire Earth and planetary sciences community. It publishes concise, exciting, high-impact articles ("Letters") of broad interest. Its focus is on physical and chemical processes, the evolution and general properties of the Earth and planets - from their deep interiors to their atmospheres. EPSL also includes a Frontiers section, featuring invited high-profile synthesis articles by leading experts on timely topics to bring cutting-edge research to the wider community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信