{"title":"用机械活化高岭土和煅烧高岭土生产石灰石煅烧粘土水泥的比较研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Limestone calcined clay cement (LC<sup>3</sup>) is a promising solution for mitigating CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in cement production by substantially replacing clinker with widely available supplementary cementitious materials. While calcination is the conventional method for activating clay, there is a growing interest in mechanical activation. Incorporating mechanically activated kaolin into LC<sup>3</sup> formulation would offer a novel approach to producing this cement. This study aims to assess the impact of replacing calcined clay (CC) with mechanically activated clay (MC) in LC<sup>3</sup> properties and relevant features. Accordingly, LC<sup>3</sup> with MC substitutions ranging from 0 to 100 wt% were formulated. The resulting cements were characterised to evaluate their physicochemical properties, microstructure, strength, and pore distribution. LC<sup>3</sup> incorporating MC exhibited comparable crystalline and amorphous phases to LC<sup>3</sup> containing CC. However, the incorporation of MC accelerated hydration, leading to the earlier formation of carboaluminates and consumption of portlandite, alongside enhanced compressive strength at early curing stages. At 28 days, LC<sup>3</sup> with 100 wt% of MC displayed similar compressive strength (42 MPa) to LC<sup>3</sup> with 100 wt% of CC (40 MPa) with comparable pore distribution and microstructure. These findings validate MC's potential to substitute CC in LC<sup>3</sup>, offering an alternative for activating clay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224023167/pdfft?md5=dbe809dc8a6642a8ddd77034414d8462&pid=1-s2.0-S2352710224023167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of limestone calcined clay cement produced with mechanically activated kaolin and calcined kaolin\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Limestone calcined clay cement (LC<sup>3</sup>) is a promising solution for mitigating CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in cement production by substantially replacing clinker with widely available supplementary cementitious materials. While calcination is the conventional method for activating clay, there is a growing interest in mechanical activation. Incorporating mechanically activated kaolin into LC<sup>3</sup> formulation would offer a novel approach to producing this cement. This study aims to assess the impact of replacing calcined clay (CC) with mechanically activated clay (MC) in LC<sup>3</sup> properties and relevant features. Accordingly, LC<sup>3</sup> with MC substitutions ranging from 0 to 100 wt% were formulated. The resulting cements were characterised to evaluate their physicochemical properties, microstructure, strength, and pore distribution. LC<sup>3</sup> incorporating MC exhibited comparable crystalline and amorphous phases to LC<sup>3</sup> containing CC. However, the incorporation of MC accelerated hydration, leading to the earlier formation of carboaluminates and consumption of portlandite, alongside enhanced compressive strength at early curing stages. At 28 days, LC<sup>3</sup> with 100 wt% of MC displayed similar compressive strength (42 MPa) to LC<sup>3</sup> with 100 wt% of CC (40 MPa) with comparable pore distribution and microstructure. These findings validate MC's potential to substitute CC in LC<sup>3</sup>, offering an alternative for activating clay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224023167/pdfft?md5=dbe809dc8a6642a8ddd77034414d8462&pid=1-s2.0-S2352710224023167-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224023167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224023167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
石灰石煅烧粘土水泥(LC3)是水泥生产中减少二氧化碳排放的一种可行解决方案,它可以用广泛使用的辅助胶凝材料大量替代熟料。虽然煅烧是活化粘土的传统方法,但人们对机械活化的兴趣与日俱增。在 LC3 配方中加入机械活化高岭土将为生产这种水泥提供一种新方法。本研究旨在评估用机械活化粘土(MC)替代煅烧粘土(CC)对 LC3 性能和相关特征的影响。因此,我们配制了 MC 替代率从 0% 到 100% 不等的 LC3。对所得水泥进行了表征,以评估其物理化学特性、微观结构、强度和孔隙分布。含有 MC 的 LC3 与含有 CC 的 LC3 具有相似的结晶相和无定形相。然而,MC 的加入加速了水化,导致碳铝酸盐的提前形成和波长石的消耗,同时增强了早期固化阶段的抗压强度。28 天时,含有 100 wt% MC 的 LC3 与含有 100 wt% CC 的 LC3(40 兆帕)显示出相似的抗压强度(42 兆帕),孔隙分布和微观结构也相当。这些发现验证了 MC 在 LC3 中替代 CC 的潜力,为活化粘土提供了一种替代方法。
Comparative study of limestone calcined clay cement produced with mechanically activated kaolin and calcined kaolin
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) is a promising solution for mitigating CO2 emissions in cement production by substantially replacing clinker with widely available supplementary cementitious materials. While calcination is the conventional method for activating clay, there is a growing interest in mechanical activation. Incorporating mechanically activated kaolin into LC3 formulation would offer a novel approach to producing this cement. This study aims to assess the impact of replacing calcined clay (CC) with mechanically activated clay (MC) in LC3 properties and relevant features. Accordingly, LC3 with MC substitutions ranging from 0 to 100 wt% were formulated. The resulting cements were characterised to evaluate their physicochemical properties, microstructure, strength, and pore distribution. LC3 incorporating MC exhibited comparable crystalline and amorphous phases to LC3 containing CC. However, the incorporation of MC accelerated hydration, leading to the earlier formation of carboaluminates and consumption of portlandite, alongside enhanced compressive strength at early curing stages. At 28 days, LC3 with 100 wt% of MC displayed similar compressive strength (42 MPa) to LC3 with 100 wt% of CC (40 MPa) with comparable pore distribution and microstructure. These findings validate MC's potential to substitute CC in LC3, offering an alternative for activating clay.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.