{"title":"利用深度学习和机器学习模型改进土壤湿度预测","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reliable soil moisture (SM) data is critical for effective water resources management, yet its accurate measurement and prediction remain challenging. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning regression network for sub-hourly SM prediction and compare its performance with traditional machine learning models, including the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient-boosting (LGB), cat boosting (CB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Sub-hourly SM, electrical conductivity (EC), soil temperature (ST), and weather parameters were collected during research experiments conducted for two years (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) at the Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), University of Florida. A network of SM sensors and a weather station were installed at the experimental site with 24 plots of green beans and sweet corn under full and three deficit irrigation treatments with three replications. Model performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) and global performance indicator (GPI) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results showed that all MLs and DL models performed more than satisfactorily in simulating SM of green beans and sweet corn plots. The testing average r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of MLs were 0.83 and 0.02 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 (sweet corn). However, XGB and LGB models outperformed the remaining ML and DL models. The testing r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of XGB were 0.86 and 0.014 for green beans, whereas 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. The r<sup>2</sup> and GPI values for the LGB were 0.85 and 0.014 for green beans, while 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. Even though DL model took longer and resources to be trained, its performance was not as accurate as that of XGB and LGB models. However, the performance of DL was better than the LSTM model. The r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of the LSTM model were 0.68 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for green beans and 0.75 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for sweet corn, respectively. Whereas the r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of DL were 0.84 and 0.015cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (sweet corn). The ML and DL models performed better in simulating SM of sweet corn plots than green beans. Overall, these results confirmed that the ML and DL models could be alternative tools for SM prediction for agricultural fields, with potential applications for irrigation scheduling and water resources management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving soil moisture prediction with deep learning and machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reliable soil moisture (SM) data is critical for effective water resources management, yet its accurate measurement and prediction remain challenging. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning regression network for sub-hourly SM prediction and compare its performance with traditional machine learning models, including the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient-boosting (LGB), cat boosting (CB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Sub-hourly SM, electrical conductivity (EC), soil temperature (ST), and weather parameters were collected during research experiments conducted for two years (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) at the Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), University of Florida. A network of SM sensors and a weather station were installed at the experimental site with 24 plots of green beans and sweet corn under full and three deficit irrigation treatments with three replications. Model performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) and global performance indicator (GPI) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results showed that all MLs and DL models performed more than satisfactorily in simulating SM of green beans and sweet corn plots. The testing average r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of MLs were 0.83 and 0.02 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 (sweet corn). However, XGB and LGB models outperformed the remaining ML and DL models. The testing r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of XGB were 0.86 and 0.014 for green beans, whereas 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. The r<sup>2</sup> and GPI values for the LGB were 0.85 and 0.014 for green beans, while 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. Even though DL model took longer and resources to be trained, its performance was not as accurate as that of XGB and LGB models. However, the performance of DL was better than the LSTM model. The r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of the LSTM model were 0.68 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for green beans and 0.75 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for sweet corn, respectively. Whereas the r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of DL were 0.84 and 0.015cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (sweet corn). The ML and DL models performed better in simulating SM of sweet corn plots than green beans. Overall, these results confirmed that the ML and DL models could be alternative tools for SM prediction for agricultural fields, with potential applications for irrigation scheduling and water resources management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924008056\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924008056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving soil moisture prediction with deep learning and machine learning models
Reliable soil moisture (SM) data is critical for effective water resources management, yet its accurate measurement and prediction remain challenging. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning regression network for sub-hourly SM prediction and compare its performance with traditional machine learning models, including the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient-boosting (LGB), cat boosting (CB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Sub-hourly SM, electrical conductivity (EC), soil temperature (ST), and weather parameters were collected during research experiments conducted for two years (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) at the Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), University of Florida. A network of SM sensors and a weather station were installed at the experimental site with 24 plots of green beans and sweet corn under full and three deficit irrigation treatments with three replications. Model performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (r2) and global performance indicator (GPI) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results showed that all MLs and DL models performed more than satisfactorily in simulating SM of green beans and sweet corn plots. The testing average r2 and GPI of MLs were 0.83 and 0.02 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 (sweet corn). However, XGB and LGB models outperformed the remaining ML and DL models. The testing r2 and GPI of XGB were 0.86 and 0.014 for green beans, whereas 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. The r2 and GPI values for the LGB were 0.85 and 0.014 for green beans, while 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. Even though DL model took longer and resources to be trained, its performance was not as accurate as that of XGB and LGB models. However, the performance of DL was better than the LSTM model. The r2 and RMSE of the LSTM model were 0.68 and 0.02cm 3 cm-3 for green beans and 0.75 and 0.02cm 3 cm-3 for sweet corn, respectively. Whereas the r2 and RMSE of DL were 0.84 and 0.015cm 3 cm-3 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 cm 3 cm-3 (sweet corn). The ML and DL models performed better in simulating SM of sweet corn plots than green beans. Overall, these results confirmed that the ML and DL models could be alternative tools for SM prediction for agricultural fields, with potential applications for irrigation scheduling and water resources management.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.