利用深度学习和机器学习模型改进土壤湿度预测

IF 7.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"利用深度学习和机器学习模型改进土壤湿度预测","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reliable soil moisture (SM) data is critical for effective water resources management, yet its accurate measurement and prediction remain challenging. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning regression network for sub-hourly SM prediction and compare its performance with traditional machine learning models, including the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient-boosting (LGB), cat boosting (CB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Sub-hourly SM, electrical conductivity (EC), soil temperature (ST), and weather parameters were collected during research experiments conducted for two years (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) at the Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), University of Florida. A network of SM sensors and a weather station were installed at the experimental site with 24 plots of green beans and sweet corn under full and three deficit irrigation treatments with three replications. Model performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) and global performance indicator (GPI) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results showed that all MLs and DL models performed more than satisfactorily in simulating SM of green beans and sweet corn plots. The testing average r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of MLs were 0.83 and 0.02 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 (sweet corn). However, XGB and LGB models outperformed the remaining ML and DL models. The testing r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of XGB were 0.86 and 0.014 for green beans, whereas 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. The r<sup>2</sup> and GPI values for the LGB were 0.85 and 0.014 for green beans, while 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. Even though DL model took longer and resources to be trained, its performance was not as accurate as that of XGB and LGB models. However, the performance of DL was better than the LSTM model. The r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of the LSTM model were 0.68 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for green beans and 0.75 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for sweet corn, respectively. Whereas the r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of DL were 0.84 and 0.015cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (sweet corn). The ML and DL models performed better in simulating SM of sweet corn plots than green beans. Overall, these results confirmed that the ML and DL models could be alternative tools for SM prediction for agricultural fields, with potential applications for irrigation scheduling and water resources management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving soil moisture prediction with deep learning and machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reliable soil moisture (SM) data is critical for effective water resources management, yet its accurate measurement and prediction remain challenging. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning regression network for sub-hourly SM prediction and compare its performance with traditional machine learning models, including the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient-boosting (LGB), cat boosting (CB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Sub-hourly SM, electrical conductivity (EC), soil temperature (ST), and weather parameters were collected during research experiments conducted for two years (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) at the Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), University of Florida. A network of SM sensors and a weather station were installed at the experimental site with 24 plots of green beans and sweet corn under full and three deficit irrigation treatments with three replications. Model performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) and global performance indicator (GPI) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results showed that all MLs and DL models performed more than satisfactorily in simulating SM of green beans and sweet corn plots. The testing average r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of MLs were 0.83 and 0.02 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 (sweet corn). However, XGB and LGB models outperformed the remaining ML and DL models. The testing r<sup>2</sup> and GPI of XGB were 0.86 and 0.014 for green beans, whereas 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. The r<sup>2</sup> and GPI values for the LGB were 0.85 and 0.014 for green beans, while 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. Even though DL model took longer and resources to be trained, its performance was not as accurate as that of XGB and LGB models. However, the performance of DL was better than the LSTM model. The r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of the LSTM model were 0.68 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for green beans and 0.75 and 0.02cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> for sweet corn, respectively. Whereas the r<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of DL were 0.84 and 0.015cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 cm <sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> (sweet corn). The ML and DL models performed better in simulating SM of sweet corn plots than green beans. Overall, these results confirmed that the ML and DL models could be alternative tools for SM prediction for agricultural fields, with potential applications for irrigation scheduling and water resources management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924008056\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924008056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可靠的土壤水分(SM)数据对于有效的水资源管理至关重要,但其精确测量和预测仍具有挑战性。本研究旨在开发一种用于亚小时土壤水分预测的深度学习回归网络,并将其性能与传统的机器学习模型进行比较,包括极梯度提升(XGB)、轻梯度提升(LGB)、猫提升(CB)、随机森林(RF)、k-近邻(kNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)模型。在佛罗里达大学热带研究与教育中心(TREC)进行的为期两年(2020-2021 年和 2021-2022 年)的研究实验中,收集了每小时次的 SM、电导率(EC)、土壤温度(ST)和天气参数。实验地点安装了一个 SM 传感器网络和一个气象站,共有 24 块绿豆和甜玉米地块,采用完全灌溉和三种亏缺灌溉处理,共三次重复。采用判定系数(r2)和全局性能指标(GPI)等模型性能指标来评估模型的性能。结果表明,所有 ML 和 DL 模型在模拟青豆和甜玉米地块 SM 方面的表现都比较令人满意。ML 的测试平均 r2 和 GPI 分别为 0.83 和 0.02(青豆)以及 0.85 和 0.02(甜玉米)。然而,XGB 和 LGB 模型的表现优于其余的 ML 和 DL 模型。XGB 的测试 r2 和 GPI 分别为 0.86 和 0.014(青豆),0.88 和 0.015(甜玉米)。LGB 的 r2 和 GPI 值分别为 0.85 和 0.014(绿豆),0.88 和 0.015(甜玉米)。尽管 DL 模型需要更长的时间和资源进行训练,但其性能不如 XGB 和 LGB 模型准确。不过,DL 模型的性能优于 LSTM 模型。绿豆和甜玉米的 LSTM 模型的 r2 和 RMSE 分别为 0.68 和 0.02cm 3 cm-3,LSTM 模型的 r2 和 RMSE 分别为 0.75 和 0.02cm 3 cm-3。而 DL 的 r2 和 RMSE 分别为 0.84 和 0.015 厘米 3 厘米-3(青豆)和 0.85 和 0.02 厘米 3 厘米-3(甜玉米)。ML 和 DL 模型模拟甜玉米地块 SM 的效果优于青豆。总之,这些结果证实,ML 和 DL 模型可作为农田 SM 预测的替代工具,在灌溉调度和水资源管理方面具有潜在的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving soil moisture prediction with deep learning and machine learning models

Improving soil moisture prediction with deep learning and machine learning models

Reliable soil moisture (SM) data is critical for effective water resources management, yet its accurate measurement and prediction remain challenging. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning regression network for sub-hourly SM prediction and compare its performance with traditional machine learning models, including the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient-boosting (LGB), cat boosting (CB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Sub-hourly SM, electrical conductivity (EC), soil temperature (ST), and weather parameters were collected during research experiments conducted for two years (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) at the Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), University of Florida. A network of SM sensors and a weather station were installed at the experimental site with 24 plots of green beans and sweet corn under full and three deficit irrigation treatments with three replications. Model performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (r2) and global performance indicator (GPI) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results showed that all MLs and DL models performed more than satisfactorily in simulating SM of green beans and sweet corn plots. The testing average r2 and GPI of MLs were 0.83 and 0.02 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 (sweet corn). However, XGB and LGB models outperformed the remaining ML and DL models. The testing r2 and GPI of XGB were 0.86 and 0.014 for green beans, whereas 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. The r2 and GPI values for the LGB were 0.85 and 0.014 for green beans, while 0.88 and 0.015 for sweet corn. Even though DL model took longer and resources to be trained, its performance was not as accurate as that of XGB and LGB models. However, the performance of DL was better than the LSTM model. The r2 and RMSE of the LSTM model were 0.68 and 0.02cm 3 cm-3 for green beans and 0.75 and 0.02cm 3 cm-3 for sweet corn, respectively. Whereas the r2 and RMSE of DL were 0.84 and 0.015cm 3 cm-3 (green beans) and 0.85 and 0.02 cm 3 cm-3 (sweet corn). The ML and DL models performed better in simulating SM of sweet corn plots than green beans. Overall, these results confirmed that the ML and DL models could be alternative tools for SM prediction for agricultural fields, with potential applications for irrigation scheduling and water resources management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信