以芒果为基础的农林业与耕地的土壤有机碳固存潜力及其可持续性比较 寻求气候适应性下的土壤肥力参数

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Syed M. Afzal Haider, Irfan Ahmad, Khaliq Majeed, Murid Hussain
{"title":"以芒果为基础的农林业与耕地的土壤有机碳固存潜力及其可持续性比较 寻求气候适应性下的土壤肥力参数","authors":"Syed M. Afzal Haider, Irfan Ahmad, Khaliq Majeed, Murid Hussain","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07493-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage is a critical ecosystem service for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Terrestrial ecosystems, including the agriculture lands, hold the second largest carbon reserves after oceans, containing 2,344 Gt of carbon. Agroforestry plays an important role in sequestering (SOC) which is essential for mitigating CO<sub>2</sub>. Due to increased anthropogenic activities, global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions continue to rise. In agroecological zones, SOC serves as a key reservoir for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. This research evaluates sustainability comparison between two land types for carbon sequestration potential and soil fertility parameters in District Multan, Pakistan; mango-based agroforestry (MBA) and cropland (CL) respectively. Soil samples were collected randomly at a depth of 20 cm from the locations; under tree shade in mango-based agroforestry (MBAUS), outside the tree shade (MBA), and cropland (CL). These samples were tested for analysis for (SOC), organic matter (OM %), nitrogen percentage (N %), saturation percentage (SP %), bulk density (BD), and carbon-to-nitrogen (C: N) ratio between mean values of agroforestry and CL. Results indicated that the amount of SOC was higher in agroforestry (0.64) compared to CL (0.43). Similarly, OM% was 1.15 in agroforestry and 0.75% in CL. N% was 0.055 in agroforestry and 0.037 in CL, C: N ratio (12:1) in agroforestry versus (11:1) in CL. SP was greater in CL (36.1) than in agroforestry (34.1), similarly, BD was higher in CL (1.361 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and (1.077 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) in agroforestry. The study employed a completely randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and four replications. ANOVA was used for data analysis. According to the results, the carbon sequestration potential and fertility index of agroforestry was quite double that of cropland.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential and Its Sustainability Comparison Between Mango-based Agroforestry and Cropland Seeking Soil Fertility Parameters Under Climate Resilience\",\"authors\":\"Syed M. Afzal Haider, Irfan Ahmad, Khaliq Majeed, Murid Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07493-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage is a critical ecosystem service for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Terrestrial ecosystems, including the agriculture lands, hold the second largest carbon reserves after oceans, containing 2,344 Gt of carbon. Agroforestry plays an important role in sequestering (SOC) which is essential for mitigating CO<sub>2</sub>. Due to increased anthropogenic activities, global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions continue to rise. In agroecological zones, SOC serves as a key reservoir for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. This research evaluates sustainability comparison between two land types for carbon sequestration potential and soil fertility parameters in District Multan, Pakistan; mango-based agroforestry (MBA) and cropland (CL) respectively. Soil samples were collected randomly at a depth of 20 cm from the locations; under tree shade in mango-based agroforestry (MBAUS), outside the tree shade (MBA), and cropland (CL). These samples were tested for analysis for (SOC), organic matter (OM %), nitrogen percentage (N %), saturation percentage (SP %), bulk density (BD), and carbon-to-nitrogen (C: N) ratio between mean values of agroforestry and CL. Results indicated that the amount of SOC was higher in agroforestry (0.64) compared to CL (0.43). Similarly, OM% was 1.15 in agroforestry and 0.75% in CL. N% was 0.055 in agroforestry and 0.037 in CL, C: N ratio (12:1) in agroforestry versus (11:1) in CL. SP was greater in CL (36.1) than in agroforestry (34.1), similarly, BD was higher in CL (1.361 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and (1.077 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) in agroforestry. The study employed a completely randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and four replications. ANOVA was used for data analysis. According to the results, the carbon sequestration potential and fertility index of agroforestry was quite double that of cropland.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07493-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07493-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤有机碳(SOC)储存是减少二氧化碳排放的一项重要生态系统服务。包括农田在内的陆地生态系统拥有仅次于海洋的第二大碳储量,碳储量达 23.44 亿吨。农林业在固碳(SOC)方面发挥着重要作用,而固碳(SOC)对减缓二氧化碳排放至关重要。由于人类活动的增加,全球二氧化碳排放量持续上升。在农业生态区,SOC 是大气中二氧化碳的重要储存库。本研究评估了巴基斯坦木尔坦地区两种土地类型(分别为芒果农林业(MBA)和耕地(CL))固碳潜力和土壤肥力参数的可持续性比较。土壤样本在 20 厘米深处随机采集,采集地点包括:芒果农林树荫下(MBAUS)、树荫下(MBA)和耕地(CL)。对这些样本进行了测试,以分析农林业和耕地平均值之间的有机碳(SOC)、有机质(OM %)、氮百分比(N %)、饱和度百分比(SP %)、容重(BD)和碳氮比(C:N)。结果表明,农林业的 SOC 量(0.64)高于 CL(0.43)。同样,农林业的 OM% 为 1.15,CL 为 0.75%。N% 在农林业中为 0.055,在 CL 中为 0.037,C:N 比在农林业中为(12:1),而在 CL 中为(11:1)。农林结合的 SP 值(36.1)高于农林结合的 SP 值(34.1),同样,农林结合的 BD 值(1.361 g/cm3)高于农林结合的 BD 值(1.077 g/cm3)。研究采用了完全随机设计(CRD),有三个处理和四个重复。数据分析采用方差分析。结果表明,农林业的固碳潜力和肥力指数是耕地的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential and Its Sustainability Comparison Between Mango-based Agroforestry and Cropland Seeking Soil Fertility Parameters Under Climate Resilience

Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Potential and Its Sustainability Comparison Between Mango-based Agroforestry and Cropland Seeking Soil Fertility Parameters Under Climate Resilience

Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage is a critical ecosystem service for reducing CO2 emissions. Terrestrial ecosystems, including the agriculture lands, hold the second largest carbon reserves after oceans, containing 2,344 Gt of carbon. Agroforestry plays an important role in sequestering (SOC) which is essential for mitigating CO2. Due to increased anthropogenic activities, global CO2 emissions continue to rise. In agroecological zones, SOC serves as a key reservoir for atmospheric CO2. This research evaluates sustainability comparison between two land types for carbon sequestration potential and soil fertility parameters in District Multan, Pakistan; mango-based agroforestry (MBA) and cropland (CL) respectively. Soil samples were collected randomly at a depth of 20 cm from the locations; under tree shade in mango-based agroforestry (MBAUS), outside the tree shade (MBA), and cropland (CL). These samples were tested for analysis for (SOC), organic matter (OM %), nitrogen percentage (N %), saturation percentage (SP %), bulk density (BD), and carbon-to-nitrogen (C: N) ratio between mean values of agroforestry and CL. Results indicated that the amount of SOC was higher in agroforestry (0.64) compared to CL (0.43). Similarly, OM% was 1.15 in agroforestry and 0.75% in CL. N% was 0.055 in agroforestry and 0.037 in CL, C: N ratio (12:1) in agroforestry versus (11:1) in CL. SP was greater in CL (36.1) than in agroforestry (34.1), similarly, BD was higher in CL (1.361 g/cm3) and (1.077 g/cm3) in agroforestry. The study employed a completely randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and four replications. ANOVA was used for data analysis. According to the results, the carbon sequestration potential and fertility index of agroforestry was quite double that of cropland.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信