俄罗斯期刊分层方法比较:科学计量指标、国际数据库和国家名录

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
E. L. Dyachenko, K. S. Guba, I. V. Potapov, A. Yu. Mironenko
{"title":"俄罗斯期刊分层方法比较:科学计量指标、国际数据库和国家名录","authors":"E. L. Dyachenko, K. S. Guba, I. V. Potapov, A. Yu. Mironenko","doi":"10.3103/s0147688224700072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>We discuss the approaches to the evaluation of scientists’ performance that prevailed in Russia over the course of the last decade. The article presents criticism of these approaches and describes the change of to the evaluation system with the development of a White List of scientific journals announced by the government. Questions have been raised regarding about the criteria for selecting journals for a White List and the need for a fair assessment of the level of scientific publications. Drawing on an analysis of Russian journals in medicine and public health, problematic aspects of different approaches to the stratification of journals are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":43962,"journal":{"name":"Scientific and Technical Information Processing","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Approaches to Stratification of Russian Journals: Scientometric Indicators, International Databases, and National Lists\",\"authors\":\"E. L. Dyachenko, K. S. Guba, I. V. Potapov, A. Yu. Mironenko\",\"doi\":\"10.3103/s0147688224700072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>We discuss the approaches to the evaluation of scientists’ performance that prevailed in Russia over the course of the last decade. The article presents criticism of these approaches and describes the change of to the evaluation system with the development of a White List of scientific journals announced by the government. Questions have been raised regarding about the criteria for selecting journals for a White List and the need for a fair assessment of the level of scientific publications. Drawing on an analysis of Russian journals in medicine and public health, problematic aspects of different approaches to the stratification of journals are identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific and Technical Information Processing\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific and Technical Information Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688224700072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific and Technical Information Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688224700072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 我们讨论了过去十年间俄罗斯盛行的科学家业绩评估方法。文章对这些方法提出了批评,并介绍了随着政府公布的科学期刊白名单的制定,评价体系发生的变化。人们对 "白名单 "选择期刊的标准以及公平评估科学出版物水平的必要性提出了质疑。通过对俄罗斯医学和公共卫生期刊的分析,我们发现了期刊分层的不同方法中存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Approaches to Stratification of Russian Journals: Scientometric Indicators, International Databases, and National Lists

Comparison of Approaches to Stratification of Russian Journals: Scientometric Indicators, International Databases, and National Lists

Abstract

We discuss the approaches to the evaluation of scientists’ performance that prevailed in Russia over the course of the last decade. The article presents criticism of these approaches and describes the change of to the evaluation system with the development of a White List of scientific journals announced by the government. Questions have been raised regarding about the criteria for selecting journals for a White List and the need for a fair assessment of the level of scientific publications. Drawing on an analysis of Russian journals in medicine and public health, problematic aspects of different approaches to the stratification of journals are identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific and Technical Information Processing
Scientific and Technical Information Processing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
42.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Scientific and Technical Information Processing  is a refereed journal that covers all aspects of management and use of information technology in libraries and archives, information centres, and the information industry in general. Emphasis is on practical applications of new technologies and techniques for information analysis and processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信