密西西比河上游流域-圣保罗的 LTAR 耕地共同试验

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Brent J. Dalzell, John M. Baker, Rodney T. Venterea, Kurt A. Spokas, Gary W. Feyereisen, Pamela J. Rice, Jonathan R. Alexander
{"title":"密西西比河上游流域-圣保罗的 LTAR 耕地共同试验","authors":"Brent J. Dalzell, John M. Baker, Rodney T. Venterea, Kurt A. Spokas, Gary W. Feyereisen, Pamela J. Rice, Jonathan R. Alexander","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Soil and Water Management Research Unit of the USDA‐Agricultural Research Service is located in St. Paul, MN, and conducts long‐term research at the University of Minnesota Research and Outreach Center located at Rosemount, MN. As part of USDA's Long‐Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network, the croplands common experiment (CCE) at this location is focused on integration of a kura clover (<jats:italic>Trifolium ambiguum</jats:italic> M. Bieb.) living mulch (KCLM) system into the prevailing 2‐year rotation of corn (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) and soybean (<jats:italic>Glycine max</jats:italic> L.) that is typical of the midwestern Corn Belt. The LTAR‐CCE conducted at Rosemount, MN, aims to compare the long‐term environmental and agronomic performance of KCLM while identifying challenges and developing management strategies for this alternative practice. The use of a living mulch for this region is advantageous because, once established, it does not require additional time for fall field operations typically associated with winter cover crops. Results from LTAR‐CCE studies at this site show that KCLM results in a substantial increase in soil field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity and decreases in leaching of nitrate‐nitrogen (NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub><jats:sup>−</jats:sup>‐N). Disadvantages of the KCLM system include potential for increased emissions of nitrous oxide (N<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O) and reduced crop yields, particularly during drought. Also, the optimal approach for crop row establishment in the spring remains uncertain. Ongoing LTAR‐CCE research with KCLM aims to better understand and quantify both benefits and risks across conditions of interannual weather variability and changing climate to develop guidance for suitable adoption and management of this alternative practice.","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The LTAR Cropland Common Experiment at Upper Mississippi River Basin–St. Paul\",\"authors\":\"Brent J. Dalzell, John M. Baker, Rodney T. Venterea, Kurt A. Spokas, Gary W. Feyereisen, Pamela J. Rice, Jonathan R. Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.20615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Soil and Water Management Research Unit of the USDA‐Agricultural Research Service is located in St. Paul, MN, and conducts long‐term research at the University of Minnesota Research and Outreach Center located at Rosemount, MN. As part of USDA's Long‐Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network, the croplands common experiment (CCE) at this location is focused on integration of a kura clover (<jats:italic>Trifolium ambiguum</jats:italic> M. Bieb.) living mulch (KCLM) system into the prevailing 2‐year rotation of corn (<jats:italic>Zea mays</jats:italic> L.) and soybean (<jats:italic>Glycine max</jats:italic> L.) that is typical of the midwestern Corn Belt. The LTAR‐CCE conducted at Rosemount, MN, aims to compare the long‐term environmental and agronomic performance of KCLM while identifying challenges and developing management strategies for this alternative practice. The use of a living mulch for this region is advantageous because, once established, it does not require additional time for fall field operations typically associated with winter cover crops. Results from LTAR‐CCE studies at this site show that KCLM results in a substantial increase in soil field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity and decreases in leaching of nitrate‐nitrogen (NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub><jats:sup>−</jats:sup>‐N). Disadvantages of the KCLM system include potential for increased emissions of nitrous oxide (N<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O) and reduced crop yields, particularly during drought. Also, the optimal approach for crop row establishment in the spring remains uncertain. Ongoing LTAR‐CCE research with KCLM aims to better understand and quantify both benefits and risks across conditions of interannual weather variability and changing climate to develop guidance for suitable adoption and management of this alternative practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国农业部农业研究局水土管理研究组位于明尼苏达州圣保罗市,并在明尼苏达州罗斯蒙特市的明尼苏达大学研究与推广中心开展长期研究。作为美国农业部长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络的一部分,该中心的耕地共同试验(CCE)侧重于将库拉三叶草(Trifolium ambiguum M. Bieb.)活体覆盖物(KCLM)系统融入玉米(Zea mays L.)和大豆(Glycine max L.)的两年轮作中,这是典型的中西部玉米带轮作方式。在明尼苏达州罗斯蒙特市开展的 LTAR-CCE 项目旨在比较 KCLM 的长期环境和农艺表现,同时确定这种替代做法所面临的挑战并制定管理策略。在该地区使用活体覆盖物的优势在于,这种覆盖物一旦形成,就不需要额外的时间进行通常与冬季覆盖作物相关的秋季田间作业。在该地进行的 LTAR-CCE 研究结果表明,KCLM 能显著提高土壤的田间饱和水力传导性,减少硝态氮(NO3--N)的沥滤。KCLM 系统的缺点包括可能会增加一氧化二氮 (N2O) 的排放和降低作物产量,尤其是在干旱期间。此外,在春季建立作物行的最佳方法仍不确定。LTAR-CCE 正在进行的 KCLM 研究旨在更好地了解和量化年际天气变化和气候变化条件下的效益和风险,为适当采用和管理这种替代做法提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The LTAR Cropland Common Experiment at Upper Mississippi River Basin–St. Paul
The Soil and Water Management Research Unit of the USDA‐Agricultural Research Service is located in St. Paul, MN, and conducts long‐term research at the University of Minnesota Research and Outreach Center located at Rosemount, MN. As part of USDA's Long‐Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network, the croplands common experiment (CCE) at this location is focused on integration of a kura clover (Trifolium ambiguum M. Bieb.) living mulch (KCLM) system into the prevailing 2‐year rotation of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) that is typical of the midwestern Corn Belt. The LTAR‐CCE conducted at Rosemount, MN, aims to compare the long‐term environmental and agronomic performance of KCLM while identifying challenges and developing management strategies for this alternative practice. The use of a living mulch for this region is advantageous because, once established, it does not require additional time for fall field operations typically associated with winter cover crops. Results from LTAR‐CCE studies at this site show that KCLM results in a substantial increase in soil field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity and decreases in leaching of nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3‐N). Disadvantages of the KCLM system include potential for increased emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and reduced crop yields, particularly during drought. Also, the optimal approach for crop row establishment in the spring remains uncertain. Ongoing LTAR‐CCE research with KCLM aims to better understand and quantify both benefits and risks across conditions of interannual weather variability and changing climate to develop guidance for suitable adoption and management of this alternative practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信