评估用于 X(推特)上用户立场检测的大型语言模型

IF 4.3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Margherita Gambini, Caterina Senette, Tiziano Fagni, Maurizio Tesconi
{"title":"评估用于 X(推特)上用户立场检测的大型语言模型","authors":"Margherita Gambini, Caterina Senette, Tiziano Fagni, Maurizio Tesconi","doi":"10.1007/s10994-024-06587-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current stance detection methods employ topic-aligned data, resulting in many unexplored topics due to insufficient training samples. Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on a vast amount of web data offer a viable solution when training data is unavailable. This work introduces <i>Tweets2Stance - T2S</i>, an unsupervised stance detection framework based on zero-shot classification, i.e. leveraging an LLM pre-trained on Natural Language Inference tasks. T2S detects a five-valued user’s stance on social-political statements by analyzing their X (Twitter) timeline. The Ground Truth of a user’s stance is obtained from Voting Advice Applications (VAAs). Through comprehensive experiments, a T2S’s optimal setting was identified for each election. Linguistic limitations related to the language model are further addressed by integrating state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 and Mixtral into the <i>T2S</i> framework. The <i>T2S</i> framework’s generalization potential is demonstrated by measuring its performance (F1 and MAE scores) across nine datasets. These datasets were built by collecting tweets from competing parties’ Twitter accounts in nine political elections held in different countries from 2019 to 2021. The results, in terms of F1 and MAE scores, outperformed all baselines and approached the best scores for each election. This showcases the ability of T2S, particularly when combined with state-of-the-art LLMs, to generalize across different cultural-political contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49900,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating large language models for user stance detection on X (Twitter)\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Gambini, Caterina Senette, Tiziano Fagni, Maurizio Tesconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10994-024-06587-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current stance detection methods employ topic-aligned data, resulting in many unexplored topics due to insufficient training samples. Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on a vast amount of web data offer a viable solution when training data is unavailable. This work introduces <i>Tweets2Stance - T2S</i>, an unsupervised stance detection framework based on zero-shot classification, i.e. leveraging an LLM pre-trained on Natural Language Inference tasks. T2S detects a five-valued user’s stance on social-political statements by analyzing their X (Twitter) timeline. The Ground Truth of a user’s stance is obtained from Voting Advice Applications (VAAs). Through comprehensive experiments, a T2S’s optimal setting was identified for each election. Linguistic limitations related to the language model are further addressed by integrating state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 and Mixtral into the <i>T2S</i> framework. The <i>T2S</i> framework’s generalization potential is demonstrated by measuring its performance (F1 and MAE scores) across nine datasets. These datasets were built by collecting tweets from competing parties’ Twitter accounts in nine political elections held in different countries from 2019 to 2021. The results, in terms of F1 and MAE scores, outperformed all baselines and approached the best scores for each election. This showcases the ability of T2S, particularly when combined with state-of-the-art LLMs, to generalize across different cultural-political contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-024-06587-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-024-06587-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的立场检测方法采用的是主题对齐数据,由于训练样本不足,导致许多主题未被探索。在没有训练数据的情况下,在大量网络数据上预先训练的大型语言模型(LLM)提供了一种可行的解决方案。这项工作介绍了 Tweets2Stance - T2S,这是一个基于零镜头分类的无监督立场检测框架,即利用在自然语言推理任务中预先训练的 LLM。T2S 通过分析用户的 X(Twitter)时间线,检测用户对社会政治声明的立场。用户立场的地面真实信息来自投票建议应用程序(VAA)。通过综合实验,为每次选举确定了 T2S 的最佳设置。通过将 GPT-4 和 Mixtral 等最先进的语言模型集成到 T2S 框架中,进一步解决了与语言模型相关的语言限制问题。通过测量 T2S 框架在九个数据集上的性能(F1 和 MAE 分数),证明了该框架的通用潜力。这些数据集是通过收集 2019 年至 2021 年在不同国家举行的九次政治选举中竞争政党的 Twitter 账户推文建立的。就 F1 和 MAE 分数而言,结果优于所有基线,并接近每次选举的最佳分数。这展示了 T2S 的能力,尤其是在与最先进的 LLM 相结合时,能够跨越不同的文化政治背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating large language models for user stance detection on X (Twitter)

Evaluating large language models for user stance detection on X (Twitter)

Current stance detection methods employ topic-aligned data, resulting in many unexplored topics due to insufficient training samples. Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on a vast amount of web data offer a viable solution when training data is unavailable. This work introduces Tweets2Stance - T2S, an unsupervised stance detection framework based on zero-shot classification, i.e. leveraging an LLM pre-trained on Natural Language Inference tasks. T2S detects a five-valued user’s stance on social-political statements by analyzing their X (Twitter) timeline. The Ground Truth of a user’s stance is obtained from Voting Advice Applications (VAAs). Through comprehensive experiments, a T2S’s optimal setting was identified for each election. Linguistic limitations related to the language model are further addressed by integrating state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 and Mixtral into the T2S framework. The T2S framework’s generalization potential is demonstrated by measuring its performance (F1 and MAE scores) across nine datasets. These datasets were built by collecting tweets from competing parties’ Twitter accounts in nine political elections held in different countries from 2019 to 2021. The results, in terms of F1 and MAE scores, outperformed all baselines and approached the best scores for each election. This showcases the ability of T2S, particularly when combined with state-of-the-art LLMs, to generalize across different cultural-political contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning
Machine Learning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Machine Learning serves as a global platform dedicated to computational approaches in learning. The journal reports substantial findings on diverse learning methods applied to various problems, offering support through empirical studies, theoretical analysis, or connections to psychological phenomena. It demonstrates the application of learning methods to solve significant problems and aims to enhance the conduct of machine learning research with a focus on verifiable and replicable evidence in published papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信