S. O. Giwa, C. N. Nwaokocha, O. M. Osifeko, B. O. Orogbade, R. T. Taziwa, N. Dyantyi, M. Sharifpur
{"title":"评估机器学习算法在预测汽油驱动家用备用发电机噪音水平和排放方面的应用","authors":"S. O. Giwa, C. N. Nwaokocha, O. M. Osifeko, B. O. Orogbade, R. T. Taziwa, N. Dyantyi, M. Sharifpur","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Machine learning is presently receiving great attention. However, machine learning applications to gasoline engine research are limited. This paper investigated the implementation of various machine learning models in predicting the emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and noise levels of gasoline-powered household generators for the first time. Data of operating and installed capacity, efficiency (input) and emissions, and noise level (output) obtained from 166 generators were used in extreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and polynomial regression (PNR) algorithms to develop predictive models. Results revealed high prediction performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9377–1.0000) of these algorithms marked with very low errors. The implementation of PNR followed by the RF exhibited the best models for predicting CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and the noise level of generators. R<sup>2</sup> of 1.000 and 0.9979–0.9994, mean squared error of < 10<sup>−6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>−5</sup>–8.6 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, mean absolute percentage error of 9.15 × 10<sup>−16</sup>–1.3 × 10<sup>−15</sup> and 7.1 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–8.1 × 10<sup>−2</sup>, and root mean squared error of 3.3 × 10<sup>−16</sup>–5.4 × 10<sup>−16</sup> and 4.4 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–9.3 × 10<sup>−2</sup> were recorded for all the output parameters using PNR and RF respectively. DT models had the least prediction capacity for CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, and noise levels (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9493–0.9592) while ANN produced the least performance for PM<sub>2.5</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9377). This study further strengthens machine learning applications in engine research for the prediction of various output parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appraising machine learning algorithms in predicting noise level and emissions from gasoline-powered household backup generators\",\"authors\":\"S. O. Giwa, C. N. Nwaokocha, O. M. Osifeko, B. O. Orogbade, R. T. Taziwa, N. Dyantyi, M. Sharifpur\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Machine learning is presently receiving great attention. However, machine learning applications to gasoline engine research are limited. This paper investigated the implementation of various machine learning models in predicting the emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and noise levels of gasoline-powered household generators for the first time. Data of operating and installed capacity, efficiency (input) and emissions, and noise level (output) obtained from 166 generators were used in extreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and polynomial regression (PNR) algorithms to develop predictive models. Results revealed high prediction performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9377–1.0000) of these algorithms marked with very low errors. The implementation of PNR followed by the RF exhibited the best models for predicting CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and the noise level of generators. R<sup>2</sup> of 1.000 and 0.9979–0.9994, mean squared error of < 10<sup>−6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>−5</sup>–8.6 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, mean absolute percentage error of 9.15 × 10<sup>−16</sup>–1.3 × 10<sup>−15</sup> and 7.1 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–8.1 × 10<sup>−2</sup>, and root mean squared error of 3.3 × 10<sup>−16</sup>–5.4 × 10<sup>−16</sup> and 4.4 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–9.3 × 10<sup>−2</sup> were recorded for all the output parameters using PNR and RF respectively. DT models had the least prediction capacity for CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, and noise levels (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9493–0.9592) while ANN produced the least performance for PM<sub>2.5</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9377). This study further strengthens machine learning applications in engine research for the prediction of various output parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Appraising machine learning algorithms in predicting noise level and emissions from gasoline-powered household backup generators
Machine learning is presently receiving great attention. However, machine learning applications to gasoline engine research are limited. This paper investigated the implementation of various machine learning models in predicting the emissions (CO2, CO, and PM2.5) and noise levels of gasoline-powered household generators for the first time. Data of operating and installed capacity, efficiency (input) and emissions, and noise level (output) obtained from 166 generators were used in extreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and polynomial regression (PNR) algorithms to develop predictive models. Results revealed high prediction performance (R2 = 0.9377–1.0000) of these algorithms marked with very low errors. The implementation of PNR followed by the RF exhibited the best models for predicting CO2, CO, PM2.5, and the noise level of generators. R2 of 1.000 and 0.9979–0.9994, mean squared error of < 10−6 and 2 × 10−5–8.6 × 10−5, mean absolute percentage error of 9.15 × 10−16–1.3 × 10−15 and 7.1 × 10−3–8.1 × 10−2, and root mean squared error of 3.3 × 10−16–5.4 × 10−16 and 4.4 × 10−3–9.3 × 10−2 were recorded for all the output parameters using PNR and RF respectively. DT models had the least prediction capacity for CO, CO2, and noise levels (R2 = 0.9493–0.9592) while ANN produced the least performance for PM2.5 (R2 = 0.9377). This study further strengthens machine learning applications in engine research for the prediction of various output parameters.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management.
A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made.
The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.