开发整合单基因、多基因和流行病学风险的乳腺癌风险预测模型

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft
{"title":"开发整合单基因、多基因和流行病学风险的乳腺癌风险预测模型","authors":"Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk\",\"authors\":\"Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌与单基因、多基因和流行病学(临床、生殖和生活方式)风险因素有关,但评估这些因素综合影响的研究还很有限。研究方法我们扩展了以前的乳腺癌风险建模工作,将六个乳腺癌易感基因中的致病变异体(PV)和 105-SNP 多基因风险评分(PRS)纳入其中,并将流行病学风险评分(ERS)纳入癌症风险评估易感性(CARRIERS)联盟从前瞻性队列和基于人群的病例对照研究中抽取的非西班牙裔白人女性样本中,其中有 23,518 例病例和 22,832 例对照。研究结果该模型预测绝经后妇女罹患乳腺癌的风险比无易感性PV和中位PRS的妇女高4.4倍,但ERS最高与最低。总体而言,具有 CHEK2 PV 的妇女一生中患乳腺癌的风险为 >20% 。然而,在有乳腺癌家族史的CHEK2 PV女性中,有15.6%的人有乳腺癌家族史;在有乳腺癌家族史的CHEK2 PV女性中,有45.1%的人没有乳腺癌家族史,她们的预测终生乳腺癌风险较低(<20%),因此低于磁共振成像筛查的阈值。处于ERS和PRS联合分布第10百分位的CHEK2 PV携带者,如果没有乳腺癌家族史,其预测终生风险与普通人群相似。结论:这些结果表明,ERS(单独或与 PRS 结合)有助于临床相关的风险分层。影响:在乳腺癌风险预测模型中整合单基因、多基因和流行病学风险因素可为个性化筛查和预防工作提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk
Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信