Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft
{"title":"开发整合单基因、多基因和流行病学风险的乳腺癌风险预测模型","authors":"Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk\",\"authors\":\"Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk
Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.