不同失效模式和接头类型下平均应力对焊接接头疲劳强度影响的估算方法研究

IF 2.4 4区 材料科学 Q2 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
Yukihide Yoshihara, Naoki Osawa, Hidekazu Murakawa, Peiyuan Dai
{"title":"不同失效模式和接头类型下平均应力对焊接接头疲劳强度影响的估算方法研究","authors":"Yukihide Yoshihara, Naoki Osawa, Hidekazu Murakawa, Peiyuan Dai","doi":"10.1007/s40194-024-01815-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In compact box-shaped steel structures, partial penetration welds are frequently selected as the welding technique, and root fatigue failure might manifest in these joints. In order to ensure the structural integrity of steel structures, it is necessary to develop an assessment approach for evaluating the efficacy of post-weld heat treatment (stress relief) in enhancing the fatigue strength of root-failed welded joints. In this study, bending fatigue experiments employing stress ratios of <i>R</i> = 0 and − 1 have been carried out on as-welded and stress-relieved welded joint specimens. The test objects include root-failed plug weld specimens, as well as toe-failed out-of-plane gusset weld joint and T-joint specimens. The welding residual stresses near the root notch and weld toe are measured by X-ray diffraction technique. The assessment of the mean stress effect on fatigue strength has been examined through the utilization of the modified MIL-HandBook-5D equivalent stress range. The equivalent stress range is evaluated by using two fatigue assessment stresses: structural stress and elastic–plastic local stress. It has been confirmed that all fatigue test results, irrespective of the failure mode or the joint type, whether from the as-welded or stress-relieved specimens, can be closely approximated using a single S–N curve with either definition of the equivalent stress. This outcome indicates the accomplishment of assessing the mean stress effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints with various failure modes and joint types.</p>","PeriodicalId":809,"journal":{"name":"Welding in the World","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the estimation method for the mean stress effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints with various failure modes and joint types\",\"authors\":\"Yukihide Yoshihara, Naoki Osawa, Hidekazu Murakawa, Peiyuan Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40194-024-01815-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In compact box-shaped steel structures, partial penetration welds are frequently selected as the welding technique, and root fatigue failure might manifest in these joints. In order to ensure the structural integrity of steel structures, it is necessary to develop an assessment approach for evaluating the efficacy of post-weld heat treatment (stress relief) in enhancing the fatigue strength of root-failed welded joints. In this study, bending fatigue experiments employing stress ratios of <i>R</i> = 0 and − 1 have been carried out on as-welded and stress-relieved welded joint specimens. The test objects include root-failed plug weld specimens, as well as toe-failed out-of-plane gusset weld joint and T-joint specimens. The welding residual stresses near the root notch and weld toe are measured by X-ray diffraction technique. The assessment of the mean stress effect on fatigue strength has been examined through the utilization of the modified MIL-HandBook-5D equivalent stress range. The equivalent stress range is evaluated by using two fatigue assessment stresses: structural stress and elastic–plastic local stress. It has been confirmed that all fatigue test results, irrespective of the failure mode or the joint type, whether from the as-welded or stress-relieved specimens, can be closely approximated using a single S–N curve with either definition of the equivalent stress. This outcome indicates the accomplishment of assessing the mean stress effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints with various failure modes and joint types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welding in the World\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welding in the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01815-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding in the World","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01815-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在紧凑型箱形钢结构中,部分熔透焊缝经常被选为焊接技术,这些焊缝可能会出现根部疲劳失效。为了确保钢结构的结构完整性,有必要开发一种评估方法,用于评价焊后热处理(应力消除)对提高根部失效焊点疲劳强度的效果。在这项研究中,采用 R = 0 和 - 1 的应力比对原焊接和应力释放焊接接头试样进行了弯曲疲劳试验。试验对象包括根部失效的塞焊试样,以及趾部失效的平面外桁架焊缝和 T 形接头试样。通过 X 射线衍射技术测量了根部缺口和焊趾附近的焊接残余应力。通过使用修改后的 MIL-HandBook-5D 等效应力范围,评估了平均应力对疲劳强度的影响。等效应力范围通过两种疲劳评估应力进行评估:结构应力和弹塑性局部应力。经证实,所有疲劳测试结果,无论失效模式或接头类型如何,无论是来自焊接状态试样还是应力消除试样,均可使用单一的 S-N 曲线与任一定义的等效应力接近。这一结果表明,评估平均应力对各种失效模式和接头类型的焊接接头疲劳强度的影响是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Study on the estimation method for the mean stress effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints with various failure modes and joint types

Study on the estimation method for the mean stress effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints with various failure modes and joint types

In compact box-shaped steel structures, partial penetration welds are frequently selected as the welding technique, and root fatigue failure might manifest in these joints. In order to ensure the structural integrity of steel structures, it is necessary to develop an assessment approach for evaluating the efficacy of post-weld heat treatment (stress relief) in enhancing the fatigue strength of root-failed welded joints. In this study, bending fatigue experiments employing stress ratios of R = 0 and − 1 have been carried out on as-welded and stress-relieved welded joint specimens. The test objects include root-failed plug weld specimens, as well as toe-failed out-of-plane gusset weld joint and T-joint specimens. The welding residual stresses near the root notch and weld toe are measured by X-ray diffraction technique. The assessment of the mean stress effect on fatigue strength has been examined through the utilization of the modified MIL-HandBook-5D equivalent stress range. The equivalent stress range is evaluated by using two fatigue assessment stresses: structural stress and elastic–plastic local stress. It has been confirmed that all fatigue test results, irrespective of the failure mode or the joint type, whether from the as-welded or stress-relieved specimens, can be closely approximated using a single S–N curve with either definition of the equivalent stress. This outcome indicates the accomplishment of assessing the mean stress effect on the fatigue strength of welded joints with various failure modes and joint types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Welding in the World
Welding in the World METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Welding in the World publishes authoritative papers on every aspect of materials joining, including welding, brazing, soldering, cutting, thermal spraying and allied joining and fabrication techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信