管理双重用途技术:国际安全协议案例研究及人工智能治理的经验教训

Akash R. Wasil, Peter Barnett, Michael Gerovitch, Roman Hauksson, Tom Reed, Jack William Miller
{"title":"管理双重用途技术:国际安全协议案例研究及人工智能治理的经验教训","authors":"Akash R. Wasil, Peter Barnett, Michael Gerovitch, Roman Hauksson, Tom Reed, Jack William Miller","doi":"arxiv-2409.02779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International AI governance agreements and institutions may play an important\nrole in reducing global security risks from advanced AI. To inform the design\nof such agreements and institutions, we conducted case studies of historical\nand contemporary international security agreements. We focused specifically on\nthose arrangements around dual-use technologies, examining agreements in\nnuclear security, chemical weapons, biosecurity, and export controls. For each\nagreement, we examined four key areas: (a) purpose, (b) core powers, (c)\ngovernance structure, and (d) instances of non-compliance. From these case\nstudies, we extracted lessons for the design of international AI agreements and\ngovernance institutions. We discuss the importance of robust verification\nmethods, strategies for balancing power between nations, mechanisms for\nadapting to rapid technological change, approaches to managing trade-offs\nbetween transparency and security, incentives for participation, and effective\nenforcement mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing dual-use technologies: Case studies of international security agreements and lessons for AI governance\",\"authors\":\"Akash R. Wasil, Peter Barnett, Michael Gerovitch, Roman Hauksson, Tom Reed, Jack William Miller\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.02779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International AI governance agreements and institutions may play an important\\nrole in reducing global security risks from advanced AI. To inform the design\\nof such agreements and institutions, we conducted case studies of historical\\nand contemporary international security agreements. We focused specifically on\\nthose arrangements around dual-use technologies, examining agreements in\\nnuclear security, chemical weapons, biosecurity, and export controls. For each\\nagreement, we examined four key areas: (a) purpose, (b) core powers, (c)\\ngovernance structure, and (d) instances of non-compliance. From these case\\nstudies, we extracted lessons for the design of international AI agreements and\\ngovernance institutions. We discuss the importance of robust verification\\nmethods, strategies for balancing power between nations, mechanisms for\\nadapting to rapid technological change, approaches to managing trade-offs\\nbetween transparency and security, incentives for participation, and effective\\nenforcement mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际人工智能治理协议和机构可在降低先进人工智能带来的全球安全风险方面发挥重要作用。为了给此类协议和机构的设计提供信息,我们对历史上和当代的国际安全协议进行了案例研究。我们特别关注围绕两用技术的安排,研究了核安全、化学武器、生物安全和出口管制方面的协议。对于每项协议,我们都研究了四个关键领域:(a) 目的;(b) 核心权力;(c) 治理结构;(d) 违约情况。从这些案例研究中,我们总结出设计国际人工智能协议和管理机构的经验教训。我们讨论了强有力的验证方法的重要性、平衡国家间权力的策略、适应快速技术变革的机制、管理透明度与安全性之间权衡的方法、参与的激励措施以及有效的执行机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governing dual-use technologies: Case studies of international security agreements and lessons for AI governance
International AI governance agreements and institutions may play an important role in reducing global security risks from advanced AI. To inform the design of such agreements and institutions, we conducted case studies of historical and contemporary international security agreements. We focused specifically on those arrangements around dual-use technologies, examining agreements in nuclear security, chemical weapons, biosecurity, and export controls. For each agreement, we examined four key areas: (a) purpose, (b) core powers, (c) governance structure, and (d) instances of non-compliance. From these case studies, we extracted lessons for the design of international AI agreements and governance institutions. We discuss the importance of robust verification methods, strategies for balancing power between nations, mechanisms for adapting to rapid technological change, approaches to managing trade-offs between transparency and security, incentives for participation, and effective enforcement mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信