对通过全尺寸拓扑优化设计的患者专用脊柱融合套管进行解剖学和机械符合性的硅学医疗器械测试

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Thijs Smit, Niels Aage, Daniel Haschtmann, Stephen J. Ferguson, Benedikt Helgason
{"title":"对通过全尺寸拓扑优化设计的患者专用脊柱融合套管进行解剖学和机械符合性的硅学医疗器械测试","authors":"Thijs Smit, Niels Aage, Daniel Haschtmann, Stephen J. Ferguson, Benedikt Helgason","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2024.1347961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A full-scale topology optimisation formulation has been developed to automate the design of cages used in instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The method incorporates the mechanical response of the adjacent bone structures in the optimisation process, yielding patient-specific spinal fusion cages that both anatomically and mechanically conform to the patient, effectively mitigating subsidence risk compared to generic, off-the-shelf cages and patient-specific devices. In this study, <jats:italic>in silico</jats:italic> medical device testing on a cohort of seven patients was performed to investigate the effectiveness of the anatomically and mechanically conforming devices using titanium and PEEK implant materials. A median reduction in the subsidence risk by 89% for titanium and 94% for PEEK implant materials was demonstrated compared to an off-the-shelf implant. A median reduction of 75% was achieved for a PEEK implant material compared to an anatomically conforming implant. A credibility assessment of the computational model used to predict the subsidence risk was provided according to the ASME V&amp;amp;V40–2018 standard.","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In silico medical device testing of anatomically and mechanically conforming patient-specific spinal fusion cages designed by full-scale topology optimisation\",\"authors\":\"Thijs Smit, Niels Aage, Daniel Haschtmann, Stephen J. Ferguson, Benedikt Helgason\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2024.1347961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A full-scale topology optimisation formulation has been developed to automate the design of cages used in instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The method incorporates the mechanical response of the adjacent bone structures in the optimisation process, yielding patient-specific spinal fusion cages that both anatomically and mechanically conform to the patient, effectively mitigating subsidence risk compared to generic, off-the-shelf cages and patient-specific devices. In this study, <jats:italic>in silico</jats:italic> medical device testing on a cohort of seven patients was performed to investigate the effectiveness of the anatomically and mechanically conforming devices using titanium and PEEK implant materials. A median reduction in the subsidence risk by 89% for titanium and 94% for PEEK implant materials was demonstrated compared to an off-the-shelf implant. A median reduction of 75% was achieved for a PEEK implant material compared to an anatomically conforming implant. A credibility assessment of the computational model used to predict the subsidence risk was provided according to the ASME V&amp;amp;V40–2018 standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1347961\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1347961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发了一种全尺度拓扑优化配方,用于自动设计器械经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术中使用的护架。该方法在优化过程中结合了邻近骨结构的机械响应,从而设计出在解剖学和机械学上都符合患者情况的患者专用脊柱融合套管,与现成的通用套管和患者专用装置相比,可有效降低下沉风险。在这项研究中,对一组七名患者进行了硅学医疗器械测试,以研究使用钛和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)植入材料的解剖学和机械顺应性器械的有效性。与现成的种植体相比,钛和 PEEK 种植体材料的下沉风险中位数分别降低了 89% 和 94%。与符合解剖结构的种植体相比,PEEK 种植体材料的中位降低率为 75%。根据 ASME V&amp;V40-2018 标准,对用于预测沉降风险的计算模型进行了可信度评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In silico medical device testing of anatomically and mechanically conforming patient-specific spinal fusion cages designed by full-scale topology optimisation
A full-scale topology optimisation formulation has been developed to automate the design of cages used in instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The method incorporates the mechanical response of the adjacent bone structures in the optimisation process, yielding patient-specific spinal fusion cages that both anatomically and mechanically conform to the patient, effectively mitigating subsidence risk compared to generic, off-the-shelf cages and patient-specific devices. In this study, in silico medical device testing on a cohort of seven patients was performed to investigate the effectiveness of the anatomically and mechanically conforming devices using titanium and PEEK implant materials. A median reduction in the subsidence risk by 89% for titanium and 94% for PEEK implant materials was demonstrated compared to an off-the-shelf implant. A median reduction of 75% was achieved for a PEEK implant material compared to an anatomically conforming implant. A credibility assessment of the computational model used to predict the subsidence risk was provided according to the ASME V&amp;V40–2018 standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信