{"title":"由 rsERT 每小时精确引导的个性化胚胎移植改善了有接受着床窗口患者的妊娠结局:一项试点研究","authors":"Tianli Yang, Zhaojuan Hou, Qiong Zhang, Jing Zhao, Nenghui Liu, Donge Liu, Yumei Li, Yonggang Wang, Bin Xu, Yangyun Zou, Cheng Wan, Yanping Li","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03246-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) predicted by a modified RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) model can improve intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) in patients with a receptive window of implantation (WOI).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>A retrospective pilot study was conducted in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Central South University, from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 524 patients with receptive WOI results from rsERT were assigned into two groups based on whether they underwent conventional embryo transfer (conventional ET) or pET. Patients in the conventional ET were matched with those in the pET group at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Before PSM, the IPR (55.73% vs. 46.19%, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and implantation rate (IR) (47.51% vs. 34.03%, <i>P</i> = 0.000) in the pET group were significantly higher than that in the conventional ET group. However, the number and types of transferred embryos differed significantly between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, IPR (57.38% vs. 44.81, <i>P</i> = 0.016) and IR (46.81% vs. 33.10%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) remained significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group. The implantation failure rate was significantly lower in the pET group compared to controls (42.62% vs. 55.19%, <i>P</i> = 0.016). Additionally, the multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group (10.29% vs. 1.68%, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Women with receptive WOI results could benefit from the receptivity-timed pET predicted by the newly refined rsERT. These findings provide a basis for future research in precision medicine for embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT with hourly precision improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with a receptive window of implantation: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Tianli Yang, Zhaojuan Hou, Qiong Zhang, Jing Zhao, Nenghui Liu, Donge Liu, Yumei Li, Yonggang Wang, Bin Xu, Yangyun Zou, Cheng Wan, Yanping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-024-03246-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) predicted by a modified RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) model can improve intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) in patients with a receptive window of implantation (WOI).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Design</h3><p>A retrospective pilot study was conducted in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Central South University, from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 524 patients with receptive WOI results from rsERT were assigned into two groups based on whether they underwent conventional embryo transfer (conventional ET) or pET. Patients in the conventional ET were matched with those in the pET group at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Before PSM, the IPR (55.73% vs. 46.19%, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and implantation rate (IR) (47.51% vs. 34.03%, <i>P</i> = 0.000) in the pET group were significantly higher than that in the conventional ET group. However, the number and types of transferred embryos differed significantly between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, IPR (57.38% vs. 44.81, <i>P</i> = 0.016) and IR (46.81% vs. 33.10%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) remained significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group. The implantation failure rate was significantly lower in the pET group compared to controls (42.62% vs. 55.19%, <i>P</i> = 0.016). Additionally, the multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group (10.29% vs. 1.68%, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Women with receptive WOI results could benefit from the receptivity-timed pET predicted by the newly refined rsERT. These findings provide a basis for future research in precision medicine for embryo transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03246-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03246-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT with hourly precision improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with a receptive window of implantation: a pilot study
Purpose
To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) predicted by a modified RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) model can improve intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) in patients with a receptive window of implantation (WOI).
Design
A retrospective pilot study was conducted in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Central South University, from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 524 patients with receptive WOI results from rsERT were assigned into two groups based on whether they underwent conventional embryo transfer (conventional ET) or pET. Patients in the conventional ET were matched with those in the pET group at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results
Before PSM, the IPR (55.73% vs. 46.19%, P = 0.032) and implantation rate (IR) (47.51% vs. 34.03%, P = 0.000) in the pET group were significantly higher than that in the conventional ET group. However, the number and types of transferred embryos differed significantly between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, IPR (57.38% vs. 44.81, P = 0.016) and IR (46.81% vs. 33.10%, P = 0.001) remained significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group. The implantation failure rate was significantly lower in the pET group compared to controls (42.62% vs. 55.19%, P = 0.016). Additionally, the multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group (10.29% vs. 1.68%, P = 0.001).
Conclusions
Women with receptive WOI results could benefit from the receptivity-timed pET predicted by the newly refined rsERT. These findings provide a basis for future research in precision medicine for embryo transfer.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.