Youn Joo Jung,Seungju Lee,Seok Kyeong Kang,Jee Yeon Kim,Ki Seok Choo,Kyung Jin Nam,Ji Hyeon Joo,Jae Joon Kim,Hyun Yul Kim
{"title":"预测 HER2 阳性乳腺癌新辅助抗 HER2 治疗病理完全反应的临床病理因素。","authors":"Youn Joo Jung,Seungju Lee,Seok Kyeong Kang,Jee Yeon Kim,Ki Seok Choo,Kyung Jin Nam,Ji Hyeon Joo,Jae Joon Kim,Hyun Yul Kim","doi":"10.1159/000541019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies have shown effectiveness against HER2-positive breast cancer. This makes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) a valuable option for treating both early and advanced stages of the disease. The tumor's response to HER2-targeted NAC provides crucial prognostic information. Additionally, it allows for tailoring adjuvant treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer based on pathological responses. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological factors that influence tumor response. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients diagnosed with HER2+ breast cancer. These patients received NAC and HER2-directed therapy between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Following surgery, tumor response was evaluated, categorizing patients into two groups: pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR groups. We analyzed data on various factors, including age, NAC regimen, type of breast and axillary surgery, clinical stage (cTNM), historical grade, and pre-operative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, p53, and KI-67. Results Out of the 122 patients, 75 achieved pCR, while 47 did not. Most clinicopathological factors showed no significant difference between the pCR and non-pCR groups. However, several factors were associated with a higher pCR rate: normal preoperative CA 15-3 levels (odds ratio [OR]: 3.74, confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-11.72, P = 0.02), preoperative-ER positivity (OR: 2.65, CI: 1.25-5.59, P = 0.01), PR negativity (OR: 3.92, CI: 1.82-8.45, P <0.05), and strong preoperative HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ staining. Multivariate analysis confirmed that PR negativity (OR: 2.8, CI: 1.23-6.42, P = 0.01) and strong preoperative-HER2 IHC 3+ staining (OR: 0.18, CI: 0.03-0.84, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of a higher pCR rate. Conclusions A pCR after NAC impacts patient prognosis and influences the choice of adjuvant treatment for HER2+ breast cancer. Clinicopathological factors can help predict responses to HER2-targeted NAC. In our study, pre-ER/PR negativity, high pre-HER2 levels, and normal CA 15-3 levels were found to be potential predictors of pCR. These findings may contribute to developing more effective treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer.","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathological factors predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Youn Joo Jung,Seungju Lee,Seok Kyeong Kang,Jee Yeon Kim,Ki Seok Choo,Kyung Jin Nam,Ji Hyeon Joo,Jae Joon Kim,Hyun Yul Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies have shown effectiveness against HER2-positive breast cancer. This makes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) a valuable option for treating both early and advanced stages of the disease. The tumor's response to HER2-targeted NAC provides crucial prognostic information. Additionally, it allows for tailoring adjuvant treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer based on pathological responses. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological factors that influence tumor response. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients diagnosed with HER2+ breast cancer. These patients received NAC and HER2-directed therapy between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Following surgery, tumor response was evaluated, categorizing patients into two groups: pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR groups. We analyzed data on various factors, including age, NAC regimen, type of breast and axillary surgery, clinical stage (cTNM), historical grade, and pre-operative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, p53, and KI-67. Results Out of the 122 patients, 75 achieved pCR, while 47 did not. Most clinicopathological factors showed no significant difference between the pCR and non-pCR groups. However, several factors were associated with a higher pCR rate: normal preoperative CA 15-3 levels (odds ratio [OR]: 3.74, confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-11.72, P = 0.02), preoperative-ER positivity (OR: 2.65, CI: 1.25-5.59, P = 0.01), PR negativity (OR: 3.92, CI: 1.82-8.45, P <0.05), and strong preoperative HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ staining. Multivariate analysis confirmed that PR negativity (OR: 2.8, CI: 1.23-6.42, P = 0.01) and strong preoperative-HER2 IHC 3+ staining (OR: 0.18, CI: 0.03-0.84, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of a higher pCR rate. Conclusions A pCR after NAC impacts patient prognosis and influences the choice of adjuvant treatment for HER2+ breast cancer. Clinicopathological factors can help predict responses to HER2-targeted NAC. In our study, pre-ER/PR negativity, high pre-HER2 levels, and normal CA 15-3 levels were found to be potential predictors of pCR. These findings may contribute to developing more effective treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicopathological factors predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Introduction Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies have shown effectiveness against HER2-positive breast cancer. This makes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) a valuable option for treating both early and advanced stages of the disease. The tumor's response to HER2-targeted NAC provides crucial prognostic information. Additionally, it allows for tailoring adjuvant treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer based on pathological responses. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological factors that influence tumor response. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients diagnosed with HER2+ breast cancer. These patients received NAC and HER2-directed therapy between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Following surgery, tumor response was evaluated, categorizing patients into two groups: pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR groups. We analyzed data on various factors, including age, NAC regimen, type of breast and axillary surgery, clinical stage (cTNM), historical grade, and pre-operative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, p53, and KI-67. Results Out of the 122 patients, 75 achieved pCR, while 47 did not. Most clinicopathological factors showed no significant difference between the pCR and non-pCR groups. However, several factors were associated with a higher pCR rate: normal preoperative CA 15-3 levels (odds ratio [OR]: 3.74, confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-11.72, P = 0.02), preoperative-ER positivity (OR: 2.65, CI: 1.25-5.59, P = 0.01), PR negativity (OR: 3.92, CI: 1.82-8.45, P <0.05), and strong preoperative HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ staining. Multivariate analysis confirmed that PR negativity (OR: 2.8, CI: 1.23-6.42, P = 0.01) and strong preoperative-HER2 IHC 3+ staining (OR: 0.18, CI: 0.03-0.84, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of a higher pCR rate. Conclusions A pCR after NAC impacts patient prognosis and influences the choice of adjuvant treatment for HER2+ breast cancer. Clinicopathological factors can help predict responses to HER2-targeted NAC. In our study, pre-ER/PR negativity, high pre-HER2 levels, and normal CA 15-3 levels were found to be potential predictors of pCR. These findings may contribute to developing more effective treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.