Qiushi Ding, Ming Zhao, Jiabing Xiao, Yanan Chen, Shixi Hao, Cheng Cheng, Xiaojian Li, Zhengxian Liu
{"title":"基于改进型高精度内部惩罚非连续伽勒金方法的大涡度模拟:流经气缸和机翼的流动","authors":"Qiushi Ding, Ming Zhao, Jiabing Xiao, Yanan Chen, Shixi Hao, Cheng Cheng, Xiaojian Li, Zhengxian Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00707-024-04060-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accuracy of flow field prediction relies on the resolution of the flow structures, and numerical simulation of flow field based on high-precision methods is of great significance. To this end, an improved interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (IPDG) method was adopted in the present study to conduct large eddy simulation (LES). It has been validated that the improved IPDG method can reach a precision of at least fourth order. Moreover, the effects of subgrid-scale models and numerical dissipation in the IPDG-LES framework remain questionable. Therefore, the turbulent flow past a circular cylinder at <i>Re</i> = 3900 has been systematically investigated. Compared with Smagorinsky models with/without a damping function and wall-adapting local eddy viscosity model, the dynamic subgrid model leads to higher accuracy due to the modeling strategy. The effect of numerical dissipation seems perverse, and the discrepancy could be attribute to the generation of aliasing error and resolved viscosity when numerical dissipation is artificially suppressed. In addition, NACA0021 airfoil flow simulation at AOA = 60 deg and <i>Re</i> = 2.7 × 10<sup>5</sup> has been conducted. The characteristics of the turbulence field and high precision are also well demonstrated under the IPDG-LES framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":456,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica","volume":"235 11","pages":"6599 - 6623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large eddy simulation based on an improved high-precision interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin method: flow past cylinders and airfoils\",\"authors\":\"Qiushi Ding, Ming Zhao, Jiabing Xiao, Yanan Chen, Shixi Hao, Cheng Cheng, Xiaojian Li, Zhengxian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00707-024-04060-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The accuracy of flow field prediction relies on the resolution of the flow structures, and numerical simulation of flow field based on high-precision methods is of great significance. To this end, an improved interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (IPDG) method was adopted in the present study to conduct large eddy simulation (LES). It has been validated that the improved IPDG method can reach a precision of at least fourth order. Moreover, the effects of subgrid-scale models and numerical dissipation in the IPDG-LES framework remain questionable. Therefore, the turbulent flow past a circular cylinder at <i>Re</i> = 3900 has been systematically investigated. Compared with Smagorinsky models with/without a damping function and wall-adapting local eddy viscosity model, the dynamic subgrid model leads to higher accuracy due to the modeling strategy. The effect of numerical dissipation seems perverse, and the discrepancy could be attribute to the generation of aliasing error and resolved viscosity when numerical dissipation is artificially suppressed. In addition, NACA0021 airfoil flow simulation at AOA = 60 deg and <i>Re</i> = 2.7 × 10<sup>5</sup> has been conducted. The characteristics of the turbulence field and high precision are also well demonstrated under the IPDG-LES framework.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Mechanica\",\"volume\":\"235 11\",\"pages\":\"6599 - 6623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Mechanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00707-024-04060-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00707-024-04060-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Large eddy simulation based on an improved high-precision interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin method: flow past cylinders and airfoils
The accuracy of flow field prediction relies on the resolution of the flow structures, and numerical simulation of flow field based on high-precision methods is of great significance. To this end, an improved interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (IPDG) method was adopted in the present study to conduct large eddy simulation (LES). It has been validated that the improved IPDG method can reach a precision of at least fourth order. Moreover, the effects of subgrid-scale models and numerical dissipation in the IPDG-LES framework remain questionable. Therefore, the turbulent flow past a circular cylinder at Re = 3900 has been systematically investigated. Compared with Smagorinsky models with/without a damping function and wall-adapting local eddy viscosity model, the dynamic subgrid model leads to higher accuracy due to the modeling strategy. The effect of numerical dissipation seems perverse, and the discrepancy could be attribute to the generation of aliasing error and resolved viscosity when numerical dissipation is artificially suppressed. In addition, NACA0021 airfoil flow simulation at AOA = 60 deg and Re = 2.7 × 105 has been conducted. The characteristics of the turbulence field and high precision are also well demonstrated under the IPDG-LES framework.
期刊介绍:
Since 1965, the international journal Acta Mechanica has been among the leading journals in the field of theoretical and applied mechanics. In addition to the classical fields such as elasticity, plasticity, vibrations, rigid body dynamics, hydrodynamics, and gasdynamics, it also gives special attention to recently developed areas such as non-Newtonian fluid dynamics, micro/nano mechanics, smart materials and structures, and issues at the interface of mechanics and materials. The journal further publishes papers in such related fields as rheology, thermodynamics, and electromagnetic interactions with fluids and solids. In addition, articles in applied mathematics dealing with significant mechanics problems are also welcome.