15 分钟紧凑型城市更环保

Francesco Marzolla, Matteo Bruno, Hygor Piaget Monteiro Melo, Vittorio Loreto
{"title":"15 分钟紧凑型城市更环保","authors":"Francesco Marzolla, Matteo Bruno, Hygor Piaget Monteiro Melo, Vittorio Loreto","doi":"arxiv-2409.01817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 15-minute city concept, advocating for cities where essential services\nare accessible within 15 minutes on foot and by bike, has gained significant\nattention in recent years. However, despite being celebrated for promoting\nsustainability, there is an ongoing debate regarding its effectiveness in\nreducing car usage and, subsequently, emissions in cities. In particular,\nlarge-scale evaluations of the effectiveness of the 15-minute concept in\nreducing emissions are lacking. To address this gap, we investigate whether\ncities with better walking accessibility, like 15-minute cities, are associated\nwith lower transportation emissions. Comparing 700 cities worldwide, we find\nthat cities with better walking accessibility to services emit less CO$_2$ per\ncapita for transport. Moreover, we observe that among cities with similar\naverage accessibility, cities spreading over larger areas tend to emit more.\nOur findings highlight the effectiveness of decentralised urban planning,\nespecially the proximity-based 15-minute city, in promoting sustainable\nmobility. However, they also emphasise the need to integrate local\naccessibility with urban compactness and efficient public transit, which are\nvital in large cities.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compact 15-minute cities are greener\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Marzolla, Matteo Bruno, Hygor Piaget Monteiro Melo, Vittorio Loreto\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.01817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 15-minute city concept, advocating for cities where essential services\\nare accessible within 15 minutes on foot and by bike, has gained significant\\nattention in recent years. However, despite being celebrated for promoting\\nsustainability, there is an ongoing debate regarding its effectiveness in\\nreducing car usage and, subsequently, emissions in cities. In particular,\\nlarge-scale evaluations of the effectiveness of the 15-minute concept in\\nreducing emissions are lacking. To address this gap, we investigate whether\\ncities with better walking accessibility, like 15-minute cities, are associated\\nwith lower transportation emissions. Comparing 700 cities worldwide, we find\\nthat cities with better walking accessibility to services emit less CO$_2$ per\\ncapita for transport. Moreover, we observe that among cities with similar\\naverage accessibility, cities spreading over larger areas tend to emit more.\\nOur findings highlight the effectiveness of decentralised urban planning,\\nespecially the proximity-based 15-minute city, in promoting sustainable\\nmobility. However, they also emphasise the need to integrate local\\naccessibility with urban compactness and efficient public transit, which are\\nvital in large cities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.01817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.01817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

15 分钟城市 "概念倡导在城市中步行或骑自行车 15 分钟内即可获得基本服务,这一概念近年来备受关注。然而,尽管该理念因促进可持续发展而备受赞誉,但关于其在减少城市汽车使用量及排放量方面的效果,却一直存在争议。尤其是缺乏对 15 分钟概念在减少排放方面的有效性的大规模评估。为了弥补这一不足,我们研究了步行可达性更好的城市(如 15 分钟城市)是否与较低的交通排放相关联。在对全球 700 个城市进行比较后,我们发现,步行可达性较好的城市人均交通二氧化碳排放量较低。此外,我们还发现,在平均可达性相似的城市中,面积较大的城市往往排放更多。我们的研究结果凸显了分散式城市规划,尤其是基于就近原则的 15 分钟城市规划,在促进可持续交通方面的有效性。我们的研究结果凸显了分散式城市规划,尤其是基于就近原则的 15 分钟城市规划,在促进可持续机动性方面的有效性,但同时也强调了将本地可达性与城市紧凑性和高效公共交通相结合的必要性,这在大城市中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compact 15-minute cities are greener
The 15-minute city concept, advocating for cities where essential services are accessible within 15 minutes on foot and by bike, has gained significant attention in recent years. However, despite being celebrated for promoting sustainability, there is an ongoing debate regarding its effectiveness in reducing car usage and, subsequently, emissions in cities. In particular, large-scale evaluations of the effectiveness of the 15-minute concept in reducing emissions are lacking. To address this gap, we investigate whether cities with better walking accessibility, like 15-minute cities, are associated with lower transportation emissions. Comparing 700 cities worldwide, we find that cities with better walking accessibility to services emit less CO$_2$ per capita for transport. Moreover, we observe that among cities with similar average accessibility, cities spreading over larger areas tend to emit more. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of decentralised urban planning, especially the proximity-based 15-minute city, in promoting sustainable mobility. However, they also emphasise the need to integrate local accessibility with urban compactness and efficient public transit, which are vital in large cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信