通过评估巴西绿甘蔗在多个地点的耐受性来研究甘蔗的健康状况

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de Castro, Lauren Maine Santos Menandro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de Castro, Marcos Antônio Kuva, João Luis Nunes Carvalho
{"title":"通过评估巴西绿甘蔗在多个地点的耐受性来研究甘蔗的健康状况","authors":"Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de Castro, Lauren Maine Santos Menandro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de Castro, Marcos Antônio Kuva, João Luis Nunes Carvalho","doi":"10.1007/s10343-024-01030-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The health and selectivity of green cane to herbicides applied in the field can be attributed to various factors, including the harvest season, soil texture, sugarcane straw on the soil surface, the selection of the correct herbicide molecule, and the appropriate timing of application. Our study aims to evaluate sugarcane development across multiple experimental sites in relation to herbicide management. We consider different amounts of sugarcane straw (0, 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) in conjunction with the beginning, middle, and end of the harvest season, across varied edaphoclimatic conditions. Five experimental sites were chosen for evaluation over two years. The primary treatments involved straw amounts placed on the soil surface: 0, 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Secondary treatments included herbicide application and no herbicide application. Parameters measured were phytotoxicity percentage and sugarcane yield. Our findings indicate that higher amounts of sugarcane straw (10 or 15 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) on the soil surface, especially in sandy soils and areas harvested early in the season, result in a higher incidence of phytointoxication compared to scenarios involving clayey soils or other harvest periods. However, phytointoxication injuries did not reduce sugarcane yield, demonstrating selectivity and health for sugarcane in the green cane under our evaluated conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12580,"journal":{"name":"Gesunde Pflanzen","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of Sugarcane Health Through Evaluating the Tolerance of Brazilian Green Cane Across Multiple Locations\",\"authors\":\"Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de Castro, Lauren Maine Santos Menandro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de Castro, Marcos Antônio Kuva, João Luis Nunes Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10343-024-01030-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The health and selectivity of green cane to herbicides applied in the field can be attributed to various factors, including the harvest season, soil texture, sugarcane straw on the soil surface, the selection of the correct herbicide molecule, and the appropriate timing of application. Our study aims to evaluate sugarcane development across multiple experimental sites in relation to herbicide management. We consider different amounts of sugarcane straw (0, 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) in conjunction with the beginning, middle, and end of the harvest season, across varied edaphoclimatic conditions. Five experimental sites were chosen for evaluation over two years. The primary treatments involved straw amounts placed on the soil surface: 0, 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Secondary treatments included herbicide application and no herbicide application. Parameters measured were phytotoxicity percentage and sugarcane yield. Our findings indicate that higher amounts of sugarcane straw (10 or 15 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) on the soil surface, especially in sandy soils and areas harvested early in the season, result in a higher incidence of phytointoxication compared to scenarios involving clayey soils or other harvest periods. However, phytointoxication injuries did not reduce sugarcane yield, demonstrating selectivity and health for sugarcane in the green cane under our evaluated conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesunde Pflanzen\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesunde Pflanzen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-01030-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesunde Pflanzen","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-01030-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色甘蔗的健康状况和对田间施用的除草剂的选择性可归因于多种因素,包括收获季节、土壤质地、土壤表面的甘蔗秸秆、选择正确的除草剂分子以及适当的施用时机。我们的研究旨在评估多个实验点甘蔗生长与除草剂管理的关系。我们考虑了不同的甘蔗秸秆用量(0、5、10 和 15 毫克/公顷-1)、收获季节的开始、中期和结束以及不同的气候条件。选择了五个实验点进行为期两年的评估。主要处理涉及土壤表面的秸秆量:0、5、10 和 15 兆克/公顷。次要处理包括施用除草剂和不施用除草剂。测量参数为植物毒性百分比和甘蔗产量。我们的研究结果表明,土壤表面甘蔗秸秆量较高(10 或 15 毫克/公顷-1),尤其是在沙质土壤和收获季节较早的地区,与粘土或其他收获期的情况相比,植物中毒发生率较高。不过,植物毒性伤害并没有降低甘蔗产量,这表明在我们的评估条件下,绿色甘蔗具有选择性和健康性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Study of Sugarcane Health Through Evaluating the Tolerance of Brazilian Green Cane Across Multiple Locations

Study of Sugarcane Health Through Evaluating the Tolerance of Brazilian Green Cane Across Multiple Locations

The health and selectivity of green cane to herbicides applied in the field can be attributed to various factors, including the harvest season, soil texture, sugarcane straw on the soil surface, the selection of the correct herbicide molecule, and the appropriate timing of application. Our study aims to evaluate sugarcane development across multiple experimental sites in relation to herbicide management. We consider different amounts of sugarcane straw (0, 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1) in conjunction with the beginning, middle, and end of the harvest season, across varied edaphoclimatic conditions. Five experimental sites were chosen for evaluation over two years. The primary treatments involved straw amounts placed on the soil surface: 0, 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1. Secondary treatments included herbicide application and no herbicide application. Parameters measured were phytotoxicity percentage and sugarcane yield. Our findings indicate that higher amounts of sugarcane straw (10 or 15 Mg ha−1) on the soil surface, especially in sandy soils and areas harvested early in the season, result in a higher incidence of phytointoxication compared to scenarios involving clayey soils or other harvest periods. However, phytointoxication injuries did not reduce sugarcane yield, demonstrating selectivity and health for sugarcane in the green cane under our evaluated conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesunde Pflanzen
Gesunde Pflanzen 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gesunde Pflanzen publiziert praxisbezogene Beiträge zum Pflanzenschutz in Landwirtschaft, Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau und öffentlichem Grün und seinen Bezügen zum Umwelt- und Verbraucherschutz sowie zu Rechtsfragen. Das Themenspektrum reicht von der Bestimmung der Schadorganismen über Maßnahmen und Verfahren zur Minderung des Befallsrisikos bis hin zur Entwicklung und Anwendung nicht-chemischer und chemischer Bekämpfungsstrategien und -verfahren, aber auch zu Fragen der Auswirkungen des Pflanzenschutzes auf die Umwelt, die Sicherung der Ernährung sowie zu allgemeinen Fragen wie Nutzen und Risiken und zur Entwicklung neuer Technologien. Jedes Heft enthält Originalbeiträge renommierter Wissenschaftler, aktuelle Informationen von Verbänden sowie aus der Industrie, Pressemitteilungen und Personalia. Damit bietet die Zeitschrift vor allem Behörden und Anwendern im Agrarsektor und Verbraucherschutz fundierte Praxisunterstützung auf wissenschaftlichem Niveau.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信