教师教育者在职前教师数学和科学模拟教学体验中使用形成性反馈的情况

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jamie N. Mikeska, Heather Howell, Devon Kinsey
{"title":"教师教育者在职前教师数学和科学模拟教学体验中使用形成性反馈的情况","authors":"Jamie N. Mikeska, Heather Howell, Devon Kinsey","doi":"10.1007/s10763-024-10489-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this research study was to identify how teacher educators (TEs) attend to and use formative feedback as they work to support preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) learning. The formative feedback was provided to the TEs as part of recurring instructional cycles within their elementary mathematics or science methods course. In these instructional cycles, their PSTs prepared for, engaged in, and reflected on their ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in a simulated classroom. After each cycle, the TEs received formative information about their PSTs’ discussion performance in the form of a feedback report and a scoring report. The study used qualitative content analysis to analyze and interpret key themes from TEs’ interview data to determine how they used this formative information. Findings suggest the TEs used the formative information provided in the feedback and scoring reports: (a) to gauge their PSTs’ instructional capabilities, (b) to reflect on and make changes to their practice, (c) to evaluate their PSTs’ understanding and interpretation of the feedback reports, and (d) to attend to specific features of their PSTs’ practice. Study results highlight the usefulness of providing TEs with formative information about their PSTs’ ability to engage in specific aspects of a core teaching practice, especially to support identification of areas for improvement and inform future instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14267,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Educators’ Use of Formative Feedback During Preservice Teachers’ Simulated Teaching Experiences in Mathematics and Science\",\"authors\":\"Jamie N. Mikeska, Heather Howell, Devon Kinsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10763-024-10489-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this research study was to identify how teacher educators (TEs) attend to and use formative feedback as they work to support preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) learning. The formative feedback was provided to the TEs as part of recurring instructional cycles within their elementary mathematics or science methods course. In these instructional cycles, their PSTs prepared for, engaged in, and reflected on their ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in a simulated classroom. After each cycle, the TEs received formative information about their PSTs’ discussion performance in the form of a feedback report and a scoring report. The study used qualitative content analysis to analyze and interpret key themes from TEs’ interview data to determine how they used this formative information. Findings suggest the TEs used the formative information provided in the feedback and scoring reports: (a) to gauge their PSTs’ instructional capabilities, (b) to reflect on and make changes to their practice, (c) to evaluate their PSTs’ understanding and interpretation of the feedback reports, and (d) to attend to specific features of their PSTs’ practice. Study results highlight the usefulness of providing TEs with formative information about their PSTs’ ability to engage in specific aspects of a core teaching practice, especially to support identification of areas for improvement and inform future instruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10489-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10489-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定教师教育者(TEs)在支持职前教师(PSTs)学习的过程中如何关注和使用形成性反馈。形成性反馈是作为小学数学或科学方法课程中循环教学的一部分提供给教师教育者的。在这些教学周期中,PST 准备、参与并反思他们在模拟课堂中促进以论证为重点的讨论的能力。每个周期结束后,教师们都会收到以反馈报告和评分报告形式提供的有关 PST 讨论表现的形成性信息。本研究采用定性内容分析法来分析和解释 TEs 访谈数据中的关键主题,以确定他们如何使用这些形成性信息。研究结果表明,技术教员使用了反馈报告和评分报告中提供的形成性信息:(a) 衡量他们的 PST 的教学能力,(b) 反思并改变他们的教学实践,(c) 评估他们的 PST 对反馈报告的理解和解释,以及 (d) 关注他们的 PST 在教学实践中的具体特点。研究结果凸显了为教师提供有关其学生参与核心教学实践特定方面能力的形成性信息的有用性,特别是有助于确定需要改进的领域并为今后的教学提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Teacher Educators’ Use of Formative Feedback During Preservice Teachers’ Simulated Teaching Experiences in Mathematics and Science

Teacher Educators’ Use of Formative Feedback During Preservice Teachers’ Simulated Teaching Experiences in Mathematics and Science

The purpose of this research study was to identify how teacher educators (TEs) attend to and use formative feedback as they work to support preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) learning. The formative feedback was provided to the TEs as part of recurring instructional cycles within their elementary mathematics or science methods course. In these instructional cycles, their PSTs prepared for, engaged in, and reflected on their ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in a simulated classroom. After each cycle, the TEs received formative information about their PSTs’ discussion performance in the form of a feedback report and a scoring report. The study used qualitative content analysis to analyze and interpret key themes from TEs’ interview data to determine how they used this formative information. Findings suggest the TEs used the formative information provided in the feedback and scoring reports: (a) to gauge their PSTs’ instructional capabilities, (b) to reflect on and make changes to their practice, (c) to evaluate their PSTs’ understanding and interpretation of the feedback reports, and (d) to attend to specific features of their PSTs’ practice. Study results highlight the usefulness of providing TEs with formative information about their PSTs’ ability to engage in specific aspects of a core teaching practice, especially to support identification of areas for improvement and inform future instruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The objective of this journal is to publish original, fully peer-reviewed articles on a variety of topics and research methods in both science and mathematics education. The journal welcomes articles that address common issues in mathematics and science education and cross-curricular dimensions more widely. Specific attention will be paid to manuscripts written by authors whose native language is not English and the editors have made arrangements for support in re-writing where appropriate. Contemporary educators highlight the importance of viewing knowledge as context-oriented and not limited to one domain. This concurs with current curriculum reforms worldwide for interdisciplinary and integrated curricula. Modern educational practice also focuses on the use of new technology in assisting instruction which may be easily implemented into such an integrated curriculum. The journal welcomes studies that explore science and mathematics education from different cultural perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信