根据《课程评价指南》对英语语言艺术课程评分的可靠性

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/15345084241271926

Matthew K. Burns, Heba Z. Abdelnaby, Jonie B. Welland, Katherine A. Graves, Kari Kurto

{"title":"根据《课程评价指南》对英语语言艺术课程评分的可靠性","authors":"Matthew K. Burns, Heba Z. Abdelnaby, Jonie B. Welland, Katherine A. Graves, Kari Kurto","doi":"10.1177/15345084241271926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined the reliability of The Reading League Curriculum-Evaluation Guidelines (CEGs), which were developed to help school-based teams rate the presence of red flags when considering adopting specific literacy curricula. Coders ( n = 30) independently used the CEGs to evaluate a free online English language arts curriculum. The results indicated strong internal consistency ( a = 0.96) and high interrater reliability ( HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p < .01). Overall, the CEGs hold the potential as a psychometrically sound tool for evaluating reading curricula. Limitations and implications for practice and research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Matthew K. Burns, Heba Z. Abdelnaby, Jonie B. Welland, Katherine A. Graves, Kari Kurto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15345084241271926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study examined the reliability of The Reading League Curriculum-Evaluation Guidelines (CEGs), which were developed to help school-based teams rate the presence of red flags when considering adopting specific literacy curricula. Coders ( n = 30) independently used the CEGs to evaluate a free online English language arts curriculum. The results indicated strong internal consistency ( a = 0.96) and high interrater reliability ( HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p < .01). Overall, the CEGs hold the potential as a psychometrically sound tool for evaluating reading curricula. Limitations and implications for practice and research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084241271926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084241271926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了《阅读联盟课程评价指南》（CEG）的可靠性，该指南旨在帮助校本团队在考虑采用特定的读写课程时评定是否存在 "红旗"。编码员（n = 30）独立使用 CEGs 评估免费在线英语语言艺术课程。结果表明，内部一致性强（a = 0.96），译者间可靠性高（HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p <.01）。总之，CEGs 有可能成为一种心理测量学上可靠的阅读课程评估工具。本文讨论了其局限性以及对实践和研究的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines

The current study examined the reliability of The Reading League Curriculum-Evaluation Guidelines (CEGs), which were developed to help school-based teams rate the presence of red flags when considering adopting specific literacy curricula. Coders ( n = 30) independently used the CEGs to evaluate a free online English language arts curriculum. The results indicated strong internal consistency ( a = 0.96) and high interrater reliability ( HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p < .01). Overall, the CEGs hold the potential as a psychometrically sound tool for evaluating reading curricula. Limitations and implications for practice and research are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量