根据《课程评价指南》对英语语言艺术课程评分的可靠性

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/15345084241271926

Matthew K. Burns, Heba Z. Abdelnaby, Jonie B. Welland, Katherine A. Graves, Kari Kurto

{"title":"根据《课程评价指南》对英语语言艺术课程评分的可靠性","authors":"Matthew K. Burns, Heba Z. Abdelnaby, Jonie B. Welland, Katherine A. Graves, Kari Kurto","doi":"10.1177/15345084241271926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined the reliability of The Reading League Curriculum-Evaluation Guidelines (CEGs), which were developed to help school-based teams rate the presence of red flags when considering adopting specific literacy curricula. Coders ( n = 30) independently used the CEGs to evaluate a free online English language arts curriculum. The results indicated strong internal consistency ( a = 0.96) and high interrater reliability ( HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p < .01). Overall, the CEGs hold the potential as a psychometrically sound tool for evaluating reading curricula. Limitations and implications for practice and research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Matthew K. Burns, Heba Z. Abdelnaby, Jonie B. Welland, Katherine A. Graves, Kari Kurto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15345084241271926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study examined the reliability of The Reading League Curriculum-Evaluation Guidelines (CEGs), which were developed to help school-based teams rate the presence of red flags when considering adopting specific literacy curricula. Coders ( n = 30) independently used the CEGs to evaluate a free online English language arts curriculum. The results indicated strong internal consistency ( a = 0.96) and high interrater reliability ( HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p < .01). Overall, the CEGs hold the potential as a psychometrically sound tool for evaluating reading curricula. Limitations and implications for practice and research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084241271926\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084241271926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了《阅读联盟课程评价指南》（CEG）的可靠性，该指南旨在帮助校本团队在考虑采用特定的读写课程时评定是否存在 "红旗"。编码员（n = 30）独立使用 CEGs 评估免费在线英语语言艺术课程。结果表明，内部一致性强（a = 0.96），译者间可靠性高（HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p <.01）。总之，CEGs 有可能成为一种心理测量学上可靠的阅读课程评估工具。本文讨论了其局限性以及对实践和研究的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines

The current study examined the reliability of The Reading League Curriculum-Evaluation Guidelines (CEGs), which were developed to help school-based teams rate the presence of red flags when considering adopting specific literacy curricula. Coders ( n = 30) independently used the CEGs to evaluate a free online English language arts curriculum. The results indicated strong internal consistency ( a = 0.96) and high interrater reliability ( HM = .91, 95% CI = .89 to .93, p < .01). Overall, the CEGs hold the potential as a psychometrically sound tool for evaluating reading curricula. Limitations and implications for practice and research are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.