{"title":"血液系统恶性肿瘤患者发生红细胞同种免疫的风险因素","authors":"Pakthipa Pattarakosol, Nattarat Lorucharoen, Phandee Watanaboonyongcharoen, Ponlapat Rojnuckarin","doi":"10.1111/tme.13096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPatients with hematologic malignancy have a higher risk of developing red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization which can delay blood transfusion. Information on the risk factors for alloimmunization in this group is still limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of RBC alloimmunization among these patients.Materials and MethodsElectronic medical records of the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL), multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma from a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, demographic and transfusion history data of the included patients were analysed.ResultsOf the 983 patients with hematologic malignancy, 798 were included in the study. The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies in this population was 4.8% (38 patients). The alloimmunization rate of each subgroup was as followed: AML 9.1%, ALL 2.9%, MM 3.8% and lymphoma 2.5%. The most common alloantibodies were anti‐Mi<jats:sup>a</jats:sup>, anti‐E and anti‐Le<jats:sup>a</jats:sup>. The majority (29/38, 76.3%) of alloimmunization had a single alloantibody. RBC autoantibody was detected in 10 patients. The detection of autoantibodies and having AML were independently associated with RBC alloimmunization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 13.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00–89.72, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.007 and aOR 11.44, 95% CI 2.02–64.72, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.006, respectively).ConclusionThe prevalence of RBC alloimmunization in the patients with hematologic malignancy was 4.8%. The alloimmunization rate of the AML subgroup was higher than those of other hematologic malignancies. The detection of autoantibodies and the AML diagnosis were identified as potential risk factors for RBC alloimmunization.","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for red blood cell alloimmunization in patients with hematologic malignancy\",\"authors\":\"Pakthipa Pattarakosol, Nattarat Lorucharoen, Phandee Watanaboonyongcharoen, Ponlapat Rojnuckarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tme.13096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionPatients with hematologic malignancy have a higher risk of developing red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization which can delay blood transfusion. Information on the risk factors for alloimmunization in this group is still limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of RBC alloimmunization among these patients.Materials and MethodsElectronic medical records of the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL), multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma from a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, demographic and transfusion history data of the included patients were analysed.ResultsOf the 983 patients with hematologic malignancy, 798 were included in the study. The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies in this population was 4.8% (38 patients). The alloimmunization rate of each subgroup was as followed: AML 9.1%, ALL 2.9%, MM 3.8% and lymphoma 2.5%. The most common alloantibodies were anti‐Mi<jats:sup>a</jats:sup>, anti‐E and anti‐Le<jats:sup>a</jats:sup>. The majority (29/38, 76.3%) of alloimmunization had a single alloantibody. RBC autoantibody was detected in 10 patients. The detection of autoantibodies and having AML were independently associated with RBC alloimmunization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 13.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00–89.72, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.007 and aOR 11.44, 95% CI 2.02–64.72, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.006, respectively).ConclusionThe prevalence of RBC alloimmunization in the patients with hematologic malignancy was 4.8%. The alloimmunization rate of the AML subgroup was higher than those of other hematologic malignancies. The detection of autoantibodies and the AML diagnosis were identified as potential risk factors for RBC alloimmunization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk factors for red blood cell alloimmunization in patients with hematologic malignancy
IntroductionPatients with hematologic malignancy have a higher risk of developing red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization which can delay blood transfusion. Information on the risk factors for alloimmunization in this group is still limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of RBC alloimmunization among these patients.Materials and MethodsElectronic medical records of the patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL), multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma from a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, demographic and transfusion history data of the included patients were analysed.ResultsOf the 983 patients with hematologic malignancy, 798 were included in the study. The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies in this population was 4.8% (38 patients). The alloimmunization rate of each subgroup was as followed: AML 9.1%, ALL 2.9%, MM 3.8% and lymphoma 2.5%. The most common alloantibodies were anti‐Mia, anti‐E and anti‐Lea. The majority (29/38, 76.3%) of alloimmunization had a single alloantibody. RBC autoantibody was detected in 10 patients. The detection of autoantibodies and having AML were independently associated with RBC alloimmunization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 13.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00–89.72, p = 0.007 and aOR 11.44, 95% CI 2.02–64.72, p = 0.006, respectively).ConclusionThe prevalence of RBC alloimmunization in the patients with hematologic malignancy was 4.8%. The alloimmunization rate of the AML subgroup was higher than those of other hematologic malignancies. The detection of autoantibodies and the AML diagnosis were identified as potential risk factors for RBC alloimmunization.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology.
In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.