共识任务交互跟踪推荐器为开发人员的软件导航提供指导

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Layan Etaiwi, Pascal Sager, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Sylvie Hamel
{"title":"共识任务交互跟踪推荐器为开发人员的软件导航提供指导","authors":"Layan Etaiwi, Pascal Sager, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Sylvie Hamel","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10528-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Developers must complete change tasks on large software systems for maintenance and development purposes. Having a custom software system with numerous instances that meet the growing client demand for features and functionalities increases the software complexity. Developers, especially newcomers, must spend a significant amount of time navigating through the source code and switching back and forth between files in order to understand such a system and find the parts relevant for performing current tasks. This navigation can be difficult, time-consuming and affect developers’ productivity. To help guide developers’ navigation towards successfully resolving tasks with minimal time and effort, we present a task-based recommendation approach that exploits aggregated developers’ interaction traces. Our novel approach, Consensus Task Interaction Trace Recommender (CITR), recommends file(s)-to-edit that help perform a set of tasks based on a tasks-related set of interaction traces obtained from developers who performed similar change tasks on the same or different custom instances of the same system. Our approach uses a consensus algorithm, which takes as input task-related interaction traces and recommends a consensus task interaction trace that developers can use to complete given similar change tasks that require editing (a) common file(s). To evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we perform three different evaluations. The first evaluation measures the accuracy of CITR recommendations. In the second evaluation, we assess to what extent CITR can help developers by conducting an observational controlled experiment in which two groups of developers performed evaluation tasks with and without the recommendations of CITR. In the third and last evaluation, we compare CITR to a state-of-the-art recommendation approach, MI. Results report with statistical significance that CITR can correctly recommend on average 73% of the files to be edited. Furthermore, they show that CITR can increase developers’ successful task completion rate. CITR outperforms MI by an average of 31% higher recommendation accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"420 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation\",\"authors\":\"Layan Etaiwi, Pascal Sager, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Sylvie Hamel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10664-024-10528-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Developers must complete change tasks on large software systems for maintenance and development purposes. Having a custom software system with numerous instances that meet the growing client demand for features and functionalities increases the software complexity. Developers, especially newcomers, must spend a significant amount of time navigating through the source code and switching back and forth between files in order to understand such a system and find the parts relevant for performing current tasks. This navigation can be difficult, time-consuming and affect developers’ productivity. To help guide developers’ navigation towards successfully resolving tasks with minimal time and effort, we present a task-based recommendation approach that exploits aggregated developers’ interaction traces. Our novel approach, Consensus Task Interaction Trace Recommender (CITR), recommends file(s)-to-edit that help perform a set of tasks based on a tasks-related set of interaction traces obtained from developers who performed similar change tasks on the same or different custom instances of the same system. Our approach uses a consensus algorithm, which takes as input task-related interaction traces and recommends a consensus task interaction trace that developers can use to complete given similar change tasks that require editing (a) common file(s). To evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we perform three different evaluations. The first evaluation measures the accuracy of CITR recommendations. In the second evaluation, we assess to what extent CITR can help developers by conducting an observational controlled experiment in which two groups of developers performed evaluation tasks with and without the recommendations of CITR. In the third and last evaluation, we compare CITR to a state-of-the-art recommendation approach, MI. Results report with statistical significance that CITR can correctly recommend on average 73% of the files to be edited. Furthermore, they show that CITR can increase developers’ successful task completion rate. CITR outperforms MI by an average of 31% higher recommendation accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"420 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10528-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10528-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出于维护和开发目的,开发人员必须完成大型软件系统的变更任务。定制软件系统拥有众多实例,可以满足客户对特性和功能不断增长的需求,这就增加了软件的复杂性。开发人员,尤其是新手,必须花费大量时间浏览源代码并在文件之间来回切换,才能理解这样的系统并找到与执行当前任务相关的部分。这种浏览方式既困难又耗时,还会影响开发人员的工作效率。为了帮助引导开发人员以最少的时间和精力成功完成任务,我们提出了一种基于任务的推荐方法,该方法利用了开发人员的聚合交互痕迹。我们的新方法--共识任务交互跟踪推荐器(CITR)--根据从在同一系统的相同或不同自定义实例上执行过类似变更任务的开发人员那里获得的与任务相关的交互跟踪集,推荐有助于执行一系列任务的编辑文件。我们的方法使用一种共识算法,该算法将与任务相关的交互跟踪作为输入,并推荐一种共识任务交互跟踪,开发人员可以使用该跟踪来完成需要编辑(一个或多个)共同文件的类似变更任务。为了评估我们方法的效率,我们进行了三种不同的评估。第一项评估是衡量 CITR 建议的准确性。在第二项评估中,我们通过观察控制实验来评估 CITR 对开发人员的帮助程度,在实验中,两组开发人员分别在使用和不使用 CITR 建议的情况下执行评估任务。在第三个也是最后一个评估中,我们将 CITR 与最先进的推荐方法 MI 进行了比较。结果表明,CITR 平均能正确推荐 73% 的待编辑文件,具有统计学意义。此外,结果还显示 CITR 可以提高开发人员的任务成功完成率。CITR 的推荐准确率比 MI 平均高出 31%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation

Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation

Developers must complete change tasks on large software systems for maintenance and development purposes. Having a custom software system with numerous instances that meet the growing client demand for features and functionalities increases the software complexity. Developers, especially newcomers, must spend a significant amount of time navigating through the source code and switching back and forth between files in order to understand such a system and find the parts relevant for performing current tasks. This navigation can be difficult, time-consuming and affect developers’ productivity. To help guide developers’ navigation towards successfully resolving tasks with minimal time and effort, we present a task-based recommendation approach that exploits aggregated developers’ interaction traces. Our novel approach, Consensus Task Interaction Trace Recommender (CITR), recommends file(s)-to-edit that help perform a set of tasks based on a tasks-related set of interaction traces obtained from developers who performed similar change tasks on the same or different custom instances of the same system. Our approach uses a consensus algorithm, which takes as input task-related interaction traces and recommends a consensus task interaction trace that developers can use to complete given similar change tasks that require editing (a) common file(s). To evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we perform three different evaluations. The first evaluation measures the accuracy of CITR recommendations. In the second evaluation, we assess to what extent CITR can help developers by conducting an observational controlled experiment in which two groups of developers performed evaluation tasks with and without the recommendations of CITR. In the third and last evaluation, we compare CITR to a state-of-the-art recommendation approach, MI. Results report with statistical significance that CITR can correctly recommend on average 73% of the files to be edited. Furthermore, they show that CITR can increase developers’ successful task completion rate. CITR outperforms MI by an average of 31% higher recommendation accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信