注意差距:英国全国范围内对 LGBTQ+ 在生育护理机构中的融入情况进行的审计

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q1 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Reproduction Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1530/rep-24-0173
Chloe He, Nour Al-ma'ani, Mei Francis, Jules Sales, Isabella Marson, Neringa Karpavičiūtė, Rishabh Hariharan, Ranya Derrick, Sotirios Saravelos, Luca Sabatini, Sofia Tzouganatou, Devika Nair, Danielle Ellis, Céline Jacques, Timothy Ferrand, Tash Oakes-Monger, Teodora Popa, Francisco Vasconcelos, Cristina Hickman
{"title":"注意差距:英国全国范围内对 LGBTQ+ 在生育护理机构中的融入情况进行的审计","authors":"Chloe He, Nour Al-ma'ani, Mei Francis, Jules Sales, Isabella Marson, Neringa Karpavičiūtė, Rishabh Hariharan, Ranya Derrick, Sotirios Saravelos, Luca Sabatini, Sofia Tzouganatou, Devika Nair, Danielle Ellis, Céline Jacques, Timothy Ferrand, Tash Oakes-Monger, Teodora Popa, Francisco Vasconcelos, Cristina Hickman","doi":"10.1530/rep-24-0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>LGBTQ+ patients comprise one of the fastest-growing user demographics in fertility care, yet they remain underrepresented in fertility research, practice, and discourse. Existing studies have revealed significant systemic barriers, including cisheteronormativity, discrimination, and gaps in clinical expertise. In this article, we present a checklist of measures clinics can take to improve LGBTQ+ inclusion in fertility care, co-created with members of the LGBTQ+ community. </p><p>This checklist focuses on three key areas: cultural competence, clinical considerations, and online presence. The cultural competence criteria encompass inclusive communication practices, a broad understanding of LGBTQ+ healthcare needs, and knowledge of treatment options suitable for LGBTQ+ individuals. Clinical considerations include awareness of alternative examination and gamete collection techniques for transgender and non-binary patients, the existence of specific clinical pathways for LGBTQ+ patients, and sensitivity to the psychological aspects of fertility care unique to this demographic. The online presence criteria evaluate provider websites for the use of inclusive language and the availability of LGBTQ+-relevant information.\n</p><p>The checklist was used as the foundation for an audit of fertility care providers across the UK in early 2024. Our audit identified a widespread lack of LGBTQ+ inclusion, particularly for transgender and non-binary patients, highlighting deficiencies in clinical knowledge and cultural competence. Our work calls attention to the need for further work to understand the barriers to inclusive and competent LGBTQ+ fertility care from both healthcare provider and patient perspectives. </p>","PeriodicalId":21127,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction","volume":"416 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the Gap: A Nationwide Audit of LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Fertility Care Providers in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Chloe He, Nour Al-ma'ani, Mei Francis, Jules Sales, Isabella Marson, Neringa Karpavičiūtė, Rishabh Hariharan, Ranya Derrick, Sotirios Saravelos, Luca Sabatini, Sofia Tzouganatou, Devika Nair, Danielle Ellis, Céline Jacques, Timothy Ferrand, Tash Oakes-Monger, Teodora Popa, Francisco Vasconcelos, Cristina Hickman\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/rep-24-0173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>LGBTQ+ patients comprise one of the fastest-growing user demographics in fertility care, yet they remain underrepresented in fertility research, practice, and discourse. Existing studies have revealed significant systemic barriers, including cisheteronormativity, discrimination, and gaps in clinical expertise. In this article, we present a checklist of measures clinics can take to improve LGBTQ+ inclusion in fertility care, co-created with members of the LGBTQ+ community. </p><p>This checklist focuses on three key areas: cultural competence, clinical considerations, and online presence. The cultural competence criteria encompass inclusive communication practices, a broad understanding of LGBTQ+ healthcare needs, and knowledge of treatment options suitable for LGBTQ+ individuals. Clinical considerations include awareness of alternative examination and gamete collection techniques for transgender and non-binary patients, the existence of specific clinical pathways for LGBTQ+ patients, and sensitivity to the psychological aspects of fertility care unique to this demographic. The online presence criteria evaluate provider websites for the use of inclusive language and the availability of LGBTQ+-relevant information.\\n</p><p>The checklist was used as the foundation for an audit of fertility care providers across the UK in early 2024. Our audit identified a widespread lack of LGBTQ+ inclusion, particularly for transgender and non-binary patients, highlighting deficiencies in clinical knowledge and cultural competence. Our work calls attention to the need for further work to understand the barriers to inclusive and competent LGBTQ+ fertility care from both healthcare provider and patient perspectives. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproduction\",\"volume\":\"416 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-24-0173\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-24-0173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者患者是生育护理中增长最快的用户群体之一,但他们在生育研究、实践和讨论中的代表性仍然不足。现有的研究揭示了重大的系统性障碍,包括顺性畸形、歧视和临床专业知识方面的差距。在本文中,我们介绍了一份与 LGBTQ+ 社区成员共同制定的诊所可采取的措施清单,以提高 LGBTQ+ 在生育护理中的包容性。该清单重点关注三个关键领域:文化能力、临床考虑因素和在线展示。文化能力标准包括包容性沟通实践、对 LGBTQ+ 医疗保健需求的广泛了解以及适合 LGBTQ+ 个人的治疗方案知识。临床考虑因素包括对变性和非二元患者的其他检查和配子采集技术的了解、针对 LGBTQ+ 患者的特定临床路径的存在,以及对该人群特有的生育保健心理方面的敏感性。在线存在标准用于评估医疗机构网站是否使用了包容性语言,是否提供了与 LGBTQ+ 相关的信息。我们的审计发现,普遍缺乏对 LGBTQ+ 的包容,尤其是对变性和非二元患者的包容,凸显了临床知识和文化能力方面的不足。我们的工作提醒人们需要进一步开展工作,从医疗服务提供者和患者的角度了解包容性和胜任的 LGBTQ+ 生育护理所面临的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the Gap: A Nationwide Audit of LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Fertility Care Providers in the United Kingdom

LGBTQ+ patients comprise one of the fastest-growing user demographics in fertility care, yet they remain underrepresented in fertility research, practice, and discourse. Existing studies have revealed significant systemic barriers, including cisheteronormativity, discrimination, and gaps in clinical expertise. In this article, we present a checklist of measures clinics can take to improve LGBTQ+ inclusion in fertility care, co-created with members of the LGBTQ+ community.

This checklist focuses on three key areas: cultural competence, clinical considerations, and online presence. The cultural competence criteria encompass inclusive communication practices, a broad understanding of LGBTQ+ healthcare needs, and knowledge of treatment options suitable for LGBTQ+ individuals. Clinical considerations include awareness of alternative examination and gamete collection techniques for transgender and non-binary patients, the existence of specific clinical pathways for LGBTQ+ patients, and sensitivity to the psychological aspects of fertility care unique to this demographic. The online presence criteria evaluate provider websites for the use of inclusive language and the availability of LGBTQ+-relevant information.

The checklist was used as the foundation for an audit of fertility care providers across the UK in early 2024. Our audit identified a widespread lack of LGBTQ+ inclusion, particularly for transgender and non-binary patients, highlighting deficiencies in clinical knowledge and cultural competence. Our work calls attention to the need for further work to understand the barriers to inclusive and competent LGBTQ+ fertility care from both healthcare provider and patient perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproduction
Reproduction 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproduction is the official journal of the Society of Reproduction and Fertility (SRF). It was formed in 2001 when the Society merged its two journals, the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility and Reviews of Reproduction. Reproduction publishes original research articles and topical reviews on the subject of reproductive and developmental biology, and reproductive medicine. The journal will consider publication of high-quality meta-analyses; these should be submitted to the research papers category. The journal considers studies in humans and all animal species, and will publish clinical studies if they advance our understanding of the underlying causes and/or mechanisms of disease. Scientific excellence and broad interest to our readership are the most important criteria during the peer review process. The journal publishes articles that make a clear advance in the field, whether of mechanistic, descriptive or technical focus. Articles that substantiate new or controversial reports are welcomed if they are noteworthy and advance the field. Topics include, but are not limited to, reproductive immunology, reproductive toxicology, stem cells, environmental effects on reproductive potential and health (eg obesity), extracellular vesicles, fertility preservation and epigenetic effects on reproductive and developmental processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信