确定空气污染对生态不利影响的新兴科学方法

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
S. Douglas Kaylor, Rebecca M. Dalton, Tara Greaver, Jeffrey D. Herrick, Emma Leath, Kristopher Novak, Caroline E. Ridley
{"title":"确定空气污染对生态不利影响的新兴科学方法","authors":"S. Douglas Kaylor,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Dalton,&nbsp;Tara Greaver,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Herrick,&nbsp;Emma Leath,&nbsp;Kristopher Novak,&nbsp;Caroline E. Ridley","doi":"10.1007/s00267-024-02039-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Now more than ever, complex socio-ecological challenges require timely and integrated responses from scientists and policymakers. Air quality is one such challenge. Under the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency establishes ambient air quality standards to protect public welfare from known or anticipated adverse effects of air pollutants. As our understanding of the environment and awareness of social values grow, there is a need to improve characterization of “adversity to the public welfare.” Scientific assessment can link ecological effects to public welfare using modern scientific approaches that incorporate ecological complexity and multiple value systems held by the public. We propose ideas for the future of scientific assessments meant to inform air quality and other environmental decision-making, including concrete ways we can focus on vulnerable species and ecosystems, incorporate a multiplicity of values, climate and multiple stressors, and partner to diversify the knowledge upon which protective policies are based.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"74 5","pages":"835 - 845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Scientific Approaches for Identifying Ecologically Adverse Effects of Air Pollution\",\"authors\":\"S. Douglas Kaylor,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Dalton,&nbsp;Tara Greaver,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Herrick,&nbsp;Emma Leath,&nbsp;Kristopher Novak,&nbsp;Caroline E. Ridley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-024-02039-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Now more than ever, complex socio-ecological challenges require timely and integrated responses from scientists and policymakers. Air quality is one such challenge. Under the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency establishes ambient air quality standards to protect public welfare from known or anticipated adverse effects of air pollutants. As our understanding of the environment and awareness of social values grow, there is a need to improve characterization of “adversity to the public welfare.” Scientific assessment can link ecological effects to public welfare using modern scientific approaches that incorporate ecological complexity and multiple value systems held by the public. We propose ideas for the future of scientific assessments meant to inform air quality and other environmental decision-making, including concrete ways we can focus on vulnerable species and ecosystems, incorporate a multiplicity of values, climate and multiple stressors, and partner to diversify the knowledge upon which protective policies are based.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"74 5\",\"pages\":\"835 - 845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-024-02039-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-024-02039-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现在,复杂的社会生态挑战比以往任何时候都更需要科学家和决策者及时采取综合应对措施。空气质量就是这样一个挑战。根据《清洁空气法案》,美国环境保护局制定了环境空气质量标准,以保护公众福利免受已知或预期的空气污染物的不利影响。随着我们对环境的理解和对社会价值认识的提高,有必要改进对 "对公共福利的不利影响 "的描述。科学评估可利用现代科学方法将生态影响与公众福利联系起来,并将生态复杂性和公众持有的多种价值体系纳入其中。我们为未来旨在为空气质量和其他环境决策提供信息的科学评估提出了一些想法,包括我们可以关注脆弱物种和生态系统的具体方法,纳入多元价值观、气候和多重压力因素,以及合作使保护政策所依据的知识多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Emerging Scientific Approaches for Identifying Ecologically Adverse Effects of Air Pollution

Emerging Scientific Approaches for Identifying Ecologically Adverse Effects of Air Pollution

Now more than ever, complex socio-ecological challenges require timely and integrated responses from scientists and policymakers. Air quality is one such challenge. Under the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency establishes ambient air quality standards to protect public welfare from known or anticipated adverse effects of air pollutants. As our understanding of the environment and awareness of social values grow, there is a need to improve characterization of “adversity to the public welfare.” Scientific assessment can link ecological effects to public welfare using modern scientific approaches that incorporate ecological complexity and multiple value systems held by the public. We propose ideas for the future of scientific assessments meant to inform air quality and other environmental decision-making, including concrete ways we can focus on vulnerable species and ecosystems, incorporate a multiplicity of values, climate and multiple stressors, and partner to diversify the knowledge upon which protective policies are based.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信