Rachel Jenkins, Matthew Samec, Courtney Arment, Kenneth J Warrington, John M Davis, Matthew J Koster
{"title":"在风湿病门诊中使用元基因组微生物血浆无细胞 DNA 下一代测序分析法","authors":"Rachel Jenkins, Matthew Samec, Courtney Arment, Kenneth J Warrington, John M Davis, Matthew J Koster","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nTo assess the utility of a metagenomic microbial plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay (Karius TestTM; KT) in the evaluation of patients in an outpatient rheumatology practice. Methods\nAll patients with a KT ordered and obtained by a rheumatology provider in the outpatient setting from 1 January 2020 through 31 December 2022 were retrospectively identified. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiologic, histopathology, and microbial studies were abstracted. Indication for KT testing was categorized. KT results were defined based on positive result and clinical relevance regarding the symptoms under investigation at the time of the rheumatologic investigation. Review of cases three months after KT was undertaken to determine clinical outcome. Results 150 patients with a KT were included (53% female, mean age 52 years). The reason for KT was evaluation of atypical presentation of rheumatic disease (80%), assessing flare versus infection in patient on immunosuppression (16.7%), and fever of unknown origin (3.3%). 24 (16%) KTs were positive, 6 of which were considered clinically relevant and altered the final diagnosis and treatment. Of the 126 negative KTs, 5 (4%) were found to have a clinically relevant infection by conventional testing methodologies. Conclusions\nIn this large retrospective cohort study, the most frequent reason for KT utilization was an atypical presentation of rheumatic disease. 25% of positive KTs altered the final diagnosis and treatment, whereas a false-negative rate of 4% was observed. KT has utility in the outpatient rheumatology assessment. Further delineation of which patients are best suited for KT testing remains to be defined.","PeriodicalId":501212,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rheumatology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Metagenomic Microbial Plasma Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in Outpatient Rheumatology Practice\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Jenkins, Matthew Samec, Courtney Arment, Kenneth J Warrington, John M Davis, Matthew J Koster\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives\\nTo assess the utility of a metagenomic microbial plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay (Karius TestTM; KT) in the evaluation of patients in an outpatient rheumatology practice. Methods\\nAll patients with a KT ordered and obtained by a rheumatology provider in the outpatient setting from 1 January 2020 through 31 December 2022 were retrospectively identified. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiologic, histopathology, and microbial studies were abstracted. Indication for KT testing was categorized. KT results were defined based on positive result and clinical relevance regarding the symptoms under investigation at the time of the rheumatologic investigation. Review of cases three months after KT was undertaken to determine clinical outcome. Results 150 patients with a KT were included (53% female, mean age 52 years). The reason for KT was evaluation of atypical presentation of rheumatic disease (80%), assessing flare versus infection in patient on immunosuppression (16.7%), and fever of unknown origin (3.3%). 24 (16%) KTs were positive, 6 of which were considered clinically relevant and altered the final diagnosis and treatment. Of the 126 negative KTs, 5 (4%) were found to have a clinically relevant infection by conventional testing methodologies. Conclusions\\nIn this large retrospective cohort study, the most frequent reason for KT utilization was an atypical presentation of rheumatic disease. 25% of positive KTs altered the final diagnosis and treatment, whereas a false-negative rate of 4% was observed. KT has utility in the outpatient rheumatology assessment. Further delineation of which patients are best suited for KT testing remains to be defined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of Metagenomic Microbial Plasma Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in Outpatient Rheumatology Practice
Objectives
To assess the utility of a metagenomic microbial plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay (Karius TestTM; KT) in the evaluation of patients in an outpatient rheumatology practice. Methods
All patients with a KT ordered and obtained by a rheumatology provider in the outpatient setting from 1 January 2020 through 31 December 2022 were retrospectively identified. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiologic, histopathology, and microbial studies were abstracted. Indication for KT testing was categorized. KT results were defined based on positive result and clinical relevance regarding the symptoms under investigation at the time of the rheumatologic investigation. Review of cases three months after KT was undertaken to determine clinical outcome. Results 150 patients with a KT were included (53% female, mean age 52 years). The reason for KT was evaluation of atypical presentation of rheumatic disease (80%), assessing flare versus infection in patient on immunosuppression (16.7%), and fever of unknown origin (3.3%). 24 (16%) KTs were positive, 6 of which were considered clinically relevant and altered the final diagnosis and treatment. Of the 126 negative KTs, 5 (4%) were found to have a clinically relevant infection by conventional testing methodologies. Conclusions
In this large retrospective cohort study, the most frequent reason for KT utilization was an atypical presentation of rheumatic disease. 25% of positive KTs altered the final diagnosis and treatment, whereas a false-negative rate of 4% was observed. KT has utility in the outpatient rheumatology assessment. Further delineation of which patients are best suited for KT testing remains to be defined.