模拟除草剂漂移改变了本地植物的开花物候学

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
David Olszyk, Thomas Pfleeger, Tamotsu Shiroyama, Matthew Blakeley-Smith, E. Henry Lee, M. S. Nash, Milton Plocher
{"title":"模拟除草剂漂移改变了本地植物的开花物候学","authors":"David Olszyk, Thomas Pfleeger, Tamotsu Shiroyama, Matthew Blakeley-Smith, E. Henry Lee, M. S. Nash, Milton Plocher","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02795-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data for herbicide effects on plant flowering are needed to determine potential impacts on plant reproduction. Thus, flowering phenology was determined for up to 12 weeks after herbicide treatment for native Willamette Valley plants growing in small plots on two Oregon State University experimental farms. Six perennial species were evaluated: <i>Camassia leichtlinii</i> (CALE), <i>Elymus glaucus</i> (ELGL), <i>Eriophyllum lanatum</i> (ERLA), <i>Festuca idahoensis</i> subsp<i>. roemeri</i> (FEID), <i>Iris tenax</i> (IRTE), and <i>Prunella vulgaris</i> var. <i>lanceolata</i> (PRVU). Effects of glyphosate and dicamba, alone and in combination, were determined using simulated drift rates of 0.1 or 0.2 x field application rates (FAR) of 1119 g ha<sup>−1</sup> active ingredient (a.i.) (830 g ha<sup>−1</sup> acid glyphosate) for glyphosate and 560 g ha<sup>−1</sup> a.i. for dicamba. Flowering phenology was evaluated as stage of development on a scale from no buds (converted to 0), buds (1), pre-flowering (2), flowering (3), post-flowering (4), to mature seeds (5) before herbicide treatment and for 12 weeks after treatment. Flowering response to herbicides varied by species and farm; but, in general, dicamba and glyphosate resulted in earlier flowering stages (delayed or not full flowering) for the dicot ERLA, and to a lesser extent, PRVU; and glyphosate resulted in earlier flowering stages for the monocot IRTE. Based on these data, the concentration of herbicide affecting flowering stage was 0.1 x FAR. Once flowering stage was inhibited by dicamba and glyphosate, plants generally did not recover to full flowering. This study provided evidence that common herbicides can affect flowering phenology of native plants with implications for seed production.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulated herbicide drift alters native plant flowering phenology\",\"authors\":\"David Olszyk, Thomas Pfleeger, Tamotsu Shiroyama, Matthew Blakeley-Smith, E. Henry Lee, M. S. Nash, Milton Plocher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10646-024-02795-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Data for herbicide effects on plant flowering are needed to determine potential impacts on plant reproduction. Thus, flowering phenology was determined for up to 12 weeks after herbicide treatment for native Willamette Valley plants growing in small plots on two Oregon State University experimental farms. Six perennial species were evaluated: <i>Camassia leichtlinii</i> (CALE), <i>Elymus glaucus</i> (ELGL), <i>Eriophyllum lanatum</i> (ERLA), <i>Festuca idahoensis</i> subsp<i>. roemeri</i> (FEID), <i>Iris tenax</i> (IRTE), and <i>Prunella vulgaris</i> var. <i>lanceolata</i> (PRVU). Effects of glyphosate and dicamba, alone and in combination, were determined using simulated drift rates of 0.1 or 0.2 x field application rates (FAR) of 1119 g ha<sup>−1</sup> active ingredient (a.i.) (830 g ha<sup>−1</sup> acid glyphosate) for glyphosate and 560 g ha<sup>−1</sup> a.i. for dicamba. Flowering phenology was evaluated as stage of development on a scale from no buds (converted to 0), buds (1), pre-flowering (2), flowering (3), post-flowering (4), to mature seeds (5) before herbicide treatment and for 12 weeks after treatment. Flowering response to herbicides varied by species and farm; but, in general, dicamba and glyphosate resulted in earlier flowering stages (delayed or not full flowering) for the dicot ERLA, and to a lesser extent, PRVU; and glyphosate resulted in earlier flowering stages for the monocot IRTE. Based on these data, the concentration of herbicide affecting flowering stage was 0.1 x FAR. Once flowering stage was inhibited by dicamba and glyphosate, plants generally did not recover to full flowering. This study provided evidence that common herbicides can affect flowering phenology of native plants with implications for seed production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02795-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02795-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要除草剂对植物开花影响的数据,以确定其对植物繁殖的潜在影响。因此,在俄勒冈州立大学两个实验农场的小块土地上,对威拉米特河谷本地植物进行了除草剂处理后长达 12 周的花期测定。对六种多年生植物进行了评估:CALE )、Elymus glaucus(ELGL)、Eriophyllum lanatum(ERLA)、Festuca idahoensis subsp.草甘膦和麦草畏单独使用或混合使用的效果是通过模拟漂移率来确定的,草甘膦的漂移率为 0.1 或 0.2 x 1119 克/公顷-1 有效成分(活性成分)(830 克/公顷-1 酸性草甘膦)的田间施用率 (FAR),麦草畏的漂移率为 560 克/公顷-1 有效成分。在除草剂处理前和处理后的 12 周内,以发育阶段为评估标准,从无花蕾(转换为 0)、花蕾(1)、开花前(2)、开花(3)、开花后(4)到成熟种子(5)。不同物种和农场对除草剂的开花反应各不相同;但总的来说,麦草畏和草甘膦会使双子叶植物 ERLA 的花期提前(延迟开花或不完全开花),其次是 PRVU;草甘膦会使单子叶植物 IRTE 的花期提前。根据这些数据,影响开花期的除草剂浓度为 0.1 x FAR。一旦麦草畏和草甘膦抑制了花期,植物一般就无法恢复到盛花期。这项研究提供的证据表明,普通除草剂会影响本地植物的开花期,并对种子生产产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Simulated herbicide drift alters native plant flowering phenology

Simulated herbicide drift alters native plant flowering phenology

Data for herbicide effects on plant flowering are needed to determine potential impacts on plant reproduction. Thus, flowering phenology was determined for up to 12 weeks after herbicide treatment for native Willamette Valley plants growing in small plots on two Oregon State University experimental farms. Six perennial species were evaluated: Camassia leichtlinii (CALE), Elymus glaucus (ELGL), Eriophyllum lanatum (ERLA), Festuca idahoensis subsp. roemeri (FEID), Iris tenax (IRTE), and Prunella vulgaris var. lanceolata (PRVU). Effects of glyphosate and dicamba, alone and in combination, were determined using simulated drift rates of 0.1 or 0.2 x field application rates (FAR) of 1119 g ha−1 active ingredient (a.i.) (830 g ha−1 acid glyphosate) for glyphosate and 560 g ha−1 a.i. for dicamba. Flowering phenology was evaluated as stage of development on a scale from no buds (converted to 0), buds (1), pre-flowering (2), flowering (3), post-flowering (4), to mature seeds (5) before herbicide treatment and for 12 weeks after treatment. Flowering response to herbicides varied by species and farm; but, in general, dicamba and glyphosate resulted in earlier flowering stages (delayed or not full flowering) for the dicot ERLA, and to a lesser extent, PRVU; and glyphosate resulted in earlier flowering stages for the monocot IRTE. Based on these data, the concentration of herbicide affecting flowering stage was 0.1 x FAR. Once flowering stage was inhibited by dicamba and glyphosate, plants generally did not recover to full flowering. This study provided evidence that common herbicides can affect flowering phenology of native plants with implications for seed production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信