简化择期手术患者的术前三阶段治疗(PACMAN)通过选择符合电话咨询条件的患者来提高效率:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Manuela Di Biase,Babette van der Zwaard,Fenne Aarts,Barbe Pieters
{"title":"简化择期手术患者的术前三阶段治疗(PACMAN)通过选择符合电话咨询条件的患者来提高效率:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Manuela Di Biase,Babette van der Zwaard,Fenne Aarts,Barbe Pieters","doi":"10.1097/eja.0000000000002055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPre-operative screening is a high volume task consuming time and resource. Streamlining patient flow by gathering information in advance reduces costs, optimises resources and diminishes patient burden whilst maintaining safety of care.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate whether 'Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts' (PACMAN) is able to improve pre-operative screening by selecting patients eligible for evaluation by telephone.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort analysis.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nA tertiary medical teaching hospital in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\r\nAdults scheduled for clinical interventions under procedural sedation and all types of elective medium or low risk surgery with anaesthetic guidance were eligible. Patients answered a questionnaire to calculate the PACMAN score. This score combined with risk factors related to surgery determines suitability for phone consultation (PhC) or the need for an in-person consultation (in-PC).\r\n\r\nINTERVENTION\r\nEvaluation of standard care.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nPrimary outcome was the reduction in number of in-PCs. Secondary outcomes included reliability of PACMAN, peri-operative patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 965 patients triaged by PACMAN, 705 (73.1%) were identified as suitable for a PhC. Of those, 688 (97.6%) were classified American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I to II or III with stable comorbidities. Of the 260 in-PC patients, 47.4% were classified ASA-PS III with unstable comorbidities or ASA-PS IV. The overall incidence of unanticipated adverse peri-operative events was 1.3%. Finally, implementation of PACMAN led to a 20% increase in pre-operative department efficiency due to better deployment of personnel and resources.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nImplementation of PACMAN resulted in a 73.1% reduction in pre-operative in-PCs at our hospital. Given the increasing pressure on healthcare systems globally, we suggest developing further optimisation and integration of smart triage solutions into the pre-operative process.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06148701.","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts (PACMAN) improves efficiency by selecting patients eligible for phone consultation: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Di Biase,Babette van der Zwaard,Fenne Aarts,Barbe Pieters\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/eja.0000000000002055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPre-operative screening is a high volume task consuming time and resource. Streamlining patient flow by gathering information in advance reduces costs, optimises resources and diminishes patient burden whilst maintaining safety of care.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo evaluate whether 'Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts' (PACMAN) is able to improve pre-operative screening by selecting patients eligible for evaluation by telephone.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nA single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTING\\r\\nA tertiary medical teaching hospital in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\\r\\nAdults scheduled for clinical interventions under procedural sedation and all types of elective medium or low risk surgery with anaesthetic guidance were eligible. Patients answered a questionnaire to calculate the PACMAN score. This score combined with risk factors related to surgery determines suitability for phone consultation (PhC) or the need for an in-person consultation (in-PC).\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERVENTION\\r\\nEvaluation of standard care.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\r\\nPrimary outcome was the reduction in number of in-PCs. Secondary outcomes included reliability of PACMAN, peri-operative patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 965 patients triaged by PACMAN, 705 (73.1%) were identified as suitable for a PhC. Of those, 688 (97.6%) were classified American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I to II or III with stable comorbidities. Of the 260 in-PC patients, 47.4% were classified ASA-PS III with unstable comorbidities or ASA-PS IV. The overall incidence of unanticipated adverse peri-operative events was 1.3%. Finally, implementation of PACMAN led to a 20% increase in pre-operative department efficiency due to better deployment of personnel and resources.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nImplementation of PACMAN resulted in a 73.1% reduction in pre-operative in-PCs at our hospital. Given the increasing pressure on healthcare systems globally, we suggest developing further optimisation and integration of smart triage solutions into the pre-operative process.\\r\\n\\r\\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\\r\\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06148701.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000002055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000002055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术前筛查是一项耗费时间和资源的大工作量工作。通过提前收集信息来简化患者流程可以降低成本、优化资源、减轻患者负担,同时保证医疗安全。目的评估 "术前三联简化择期手术患者程序"(PACMAN)是否能够通过电话筛选出符合评估条件的患者来改进术前筛查。患者和方法计划在程序性镇静下进行临床干预的成人以及在麻醉指导下进行所有类型的中低风险择期手术的患者均符合条件。患者回答问卷以计算 PACMAN 评分。该评分结合与手术相关的风险因素决定患者是否适合电话咨询(PhC)或是否需要亲自咨询(in-PC)。主要结果测量主要结果是减少了in-PC的次数。次要结果包括 PACMAN 的可靠性、围手术期患者预后和成本效益。结果在 PACMAN 分流的 965 名患者中,有 705 人(73.1%)被确定为适合进行现场会诊。其中,688 人(97.6%)被归类为美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)I 至 II 级或 III 级,合并症稳定。在 260 名住院患者中,47.4% 被归类为 ASA-PS III 且合并症不稳定或 ASA-PS IV。围手术期意外不良事件的总发生率为 1.3%。最后,由于更好地调配了人员和资源,PACMAN 的实施使术前部门的效率提高了 20%。鉴于全球医疗系统面临的压力越来越大,我们建议进一步优化和整合术前流程中的智能分诊解决方案:NCT06148701。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts (PACMAN) improves efficiency by selecting patients eligible for phone consultation: A retrospective cohort study.
BACKGROUND Pre-operative screening is a high volume task consuming time and resource. Streamlining patient flow by gathering information in advance reduces costs, optimises resources and diminishes patient burden whilst maintaining safety of care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether 'Pre-operative triAge proCedure to streaMline elective surgicAl patieNts' (PACMAN) is able to improve pre-operative screening by selecting patients eligible for evaluation by telephone. DESIGN A single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort analysis. SETTING A tertiary medical teaching hospital in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults scheduled for clinical interventions under procedural sedation and all types of elective medium or low risk surgery with anaesthetic guidance were eligible. Patients answered a questionnaire to calculate the PACMAN score. This score combined with risk factors related to surgery determines suitability for phone consultation (PhC) or the need for an in-person consultation (in-PC). INTERVENTION Evaluation of standard care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was the reduction in number of in-PCs. Secondary outcomes included reliability of PACMAN, peri-operative patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Of 965 patients triaged by PACMAN, 705 (73.1%) were identified as suitable for a PhC. Of those, 688 (97.6%) were classified American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I to II or III with stable comorbidities. Of the 260 in-PC patients, 47.4% were classified ASA-PS III with unstable comorbidities or ASA-PS IV. The overall incidence of unanticipated adverse peri-operative events was 1.3%. Finally, implementation of PACMAN led to a 20% increase in pre-operative department efficiency due to better deployment of personnel and resources. CONCLUSION Implementation of PACMAN resulted in a 73.1% reduction in pre-operative in-PCs at our hospital. Given the increasing pressure on healthcare systems globally, we suggest developing further optimisation and integration of smart triage solutions into the pre-operative process. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06148701.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信