将 ChatGPT 与高等教育学习分析进行课堂整合

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Expert Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1111/exsy.13703
Miguel Civit, María José Escalona, Francisco Cuadrado, Salvador Reyes‐de‐Cozar
{"title":"将 ChatGPT 与高等教育学习分析进行课堂整合","authors":"Miguel Civit, María José Escalona, Francisco Cuadrado, Salvador Reyes‐de‐Cozar","doi":"10.1111/exsy.13703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundActive Learning with AI‐tutoring in Higher Education tackles dropout rates.ObjectivesTo investigate teaching‐learning methodologies preferred by students. AHP is used to evaluate a ChatGPT‐based studented learning methodology which is compared to another active learning methodology and a traditional methodology. Study with Learning Analytics to evaluate alternatives, and help students elect the best strategies according to their preferences.MethodsComparative study of three learning methodologies in a counterbalanced Single‐Group with 33 university students. It follows a pre‐test/post‐test approach using AHP and SAM. HRV and GSR used for the estimation of emotional states.FindingsCriteria related to in‐class experiences valued higher than test‐related criteria. Chat‐GPT integration was well regarded compared to well‐established methodologies. Student emotion self‐assessment correlated with physiological measures, validating used Learning Analytics.ConclusionsProposed model AI‐Tutoring classroom integration functions effectively at increasing engagement and avoiding false information. AHP with the physiological measuring allows students to determine preferred learning methodologies, avoiding biases, and acknowledging minority groups.","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Class integration of ChatGPT and learning analytics for higher education\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Civit, María José Escalona, Francisco Cuadrado, Salvador Reyes‐de‐Cozar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/exsy.13703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundActive Learning with AI‐tutoring in Higher Education tackles dropout rates.ObjectivesTo investigate teaching‐learning methodologies preferred by students. AHP is used to evaluate a ChatGPT‐based studented learning methodology which is compared to another active learning methodology and a traditional methodology. Study with Learning Analytics to evaluate alternatives, and help students elect the best strategies according to their preferences.MethodsComparative study of three learning methodologies in a counterbalanced Single‐Group with 33 university students. It follows a pre‐test/post‐test approach using AHP and SAM. HRV and GSR used for the estimation of emotional states.FindingsCriteria related to in‐class experiences valued higher than test‐related criteria. Chat‐GPT integration was well regarded compared to well‐established methodologies. Student emotion self‐assessment correlated with physiological measures, validating used Learning Analytics.ConclusionsProposed model AI‐Tutoring classroom integration functions effectively at increasing engagement and avoiding false information. AHP with the physiological measuring allows students to determine preferred learning methodologies, avoiding biases, and acknowledging minority groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景高等教育中的主动学习与人工智能辅导解决了辍学率问题。使用 AHP 评估基于 ChatGPT 的学生学习方法,并与另一种主动学习方法和传统方法进行比较。研究使用学习分析来评估备选方案,并帮助学生根据自己的偏好选择最佳策略。方法在 33 名大学生中对三种学习方法进行单组平衡比较研究。采用 AHP 和 SAM 进行前测/后测。研究结果与课堂体验相关的标准高于与测试相关的标准。与成熟的方法相比,聊天-GPT 整合受到好评。学生的情绪自我评估与生理测量结果相关,验证了所使用的学习分析方法。结合生理测量的 AHP 可以让学生确定自己喜欢的学习方法,避免偏见,并承认少数群体的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Class integration of ChatGPT and learning analytics for higher education
BackgroundActive Learning with AI‐tutoring in Higher Education tackles dropout rates.ObjectivesTo investigate teaching‐learning methodologies preferred by students. AHP is used to evaluate a ChatGPT‐based studented learning methodology which is compared to another active learning methodology and a traditional methodology. Study with Learning Analytics to evaluate alternatives, and help students elect the best strategies according to their preferences.MethodsComparative study of three learning methodologies in a counterbalanced Single‐Group with 33 university students. It follows a pre‐test/post‐test approach using AHP and SAM. HRV and GSR used for the estimation of emotional states.FindingsCriteria related to in‐class experiences valued higher than test‐related criteria. Chat‐GPT integration was well regarded compared to well‐established methodologies. Student emotion self‐assessment correlated with physiological measures, validating used Learning Analytics.ConclusionsProposed model AI‐Tutoring classroom integration functions effectively at increasing engagement and avoiding false information. AHP with the physiological measuring allows students to determine preferred learning methodologies, avoiding biases, and acknowledging minority groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信